I don't.Canon's new cameras were $4000+, Nikon's were what? $700+?
I think Canon would take that trade of a decrease of basically rounding error on overall sales, for selling units that are around 3 to 4x as expensive as the aforementioned nikon releases. (and so would Canon's retailers) happily.
Reading their financial statements, Canon is obsessed with a market share goal of around 50% for some reason.
They price their cameras to meet that goal.
Nikon seems to put profit first.
Looking at the actual lineup makes it look less straightforward.
The R1 is more expensive than anything Nikon makes, the R5 II is priced between the Z8 and Z9, and the Z30 is pretty cheap.
Upvote
0