B
briansquibb
Guest
skitron said:briansquibb said:swrightgfx said:I do believe this was in reference to second-hand value, potentially reduced over a big fuss about a problem that is not symptomatic within the specifications of the device and has been evident on other models unnoticed for years.Hesham said:"tarnished the reputation of a fine camera"
reputation of a CAMERA???? what's with you people??
Absolutely right - the 5D3 will now be tarnished as 'faulty', when in fact it is within specifications just that in an obscure situation the metering is slightly out (than could easily corrected in pp)
I'll offer $2500 to anyone for their 'faulty' 5D3.
Any sellers?
I didn't think so.
So much for the devaluation argument...
That is because they sent them back to Canon .....
Upvote
0