There may be more in the camera that meets the eye (and spec sheets). Let's just wait for a field tests and performance...
Upvote
0
+1kdsand said:I agree withe AvTvM. WiFi is an inexcusable omission. Not only is it a matter of tethering but also I like reviewing jpegs for example with no fuss or muss in a busy restaurant on my phone & sharing quickly & easily. Once that would be a luxury but now its a comon feature available in cameras that cost less than $99.00. This cries out to me canon is negligent & or intends to rip me off.
Next is touch screen. Now don't get me wrong we want & need our existing hard buttons but in many cases option of tapping screen is a huge huge time saver. Such as reviewing pics, live view focus & even menus. Fast navigating is important right?
Kinda like buying a brand new high end car & being told keyless entry & amfm radio doesn't come standard........
Grrrrrrrr canon just grrrrrrrr!
I agree with these observations, the focus is not the same in the two images. If you are cropping to the same framing as the 70D shot then l would expect the 70D to show more detail because it represents the space with more pixels. The reasons it might not is if the image is softened by high-ISO noise (maybe using over ISO-1600) or diffraction (maybe using a setting over f/8). In good light the 5D cropped to APS-C will not resolve more than the 70D uncropped, at best it will be equal.kphoto99 said:MagnumJoe said:Etienne said:MagnumJoe said:Etienne said:Woody said:MagnumJoe said:The 5D MK III had so much more detail and much sharper than the 70D.
Should not come as a surprise. Even low quality lenses like the 17-40 shine on the 5D3/6D but appear very bad when mounted on APS-C cameras. It's just a matter of pixel density.
http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/ISO-12233-Sample-Crops.aspx?
Lens=687&Camera=736&Sample=0&FLI=0&API=0&LensComp=687&CameraComp=453&SampleComp=0&FLIComp=0&APIComp=0
Woody, I agree with you, I should have known. Here are the photos I was referring to.
The top photo is focussed in front of the seated people. Look at the grass out front. I'd say it's front focussed by a couple of feet, leaving the subjects a little out of focus in behind
Hi Etienne, I respect your attention to detail, but that is just not the case, I simply changed cameras and focused on my daughter and cropped it.
Just look at the fence, it is so much more out of focus in the top photo then in the bottom. Either you used different aperture or the focus point was not the same location.
+1!Khalai said:There may be more in the camera that meets the eye (and spec sheets). Let's just wait for a field tests and performance...
whothafunk said:Near $3000 for an APS-C haha. People with such nonlogical thinking should get off their unicorns.
sdfreeland said:Etienne said:MagnumJoe said:Etienne said:Woody said:MagnumJoe said:The 5D MK III had so much more detail and much sharper than the 70D.
Should not come as a surprise. Even low quality lenses like the 17-40 shine on the 5D3/6D but appear very bad when mounted on APS-C cameras. It's just a matter of pixel density.
http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/ISO-12233-Sample-Crops.aspx?Lens=687&Camera=736&Sample=0&FLI=0&API=0&LensComp=687&CameraComp=453&SampleComp=0&FLIComp=0&APIComp=0
Woody, I agree with you, I should have known. Here are the photos I was referring to.
The top photo is focussed in front of the seated people. Look at the grass out front. I'd say it's front focussed by a couple of feet, leaving the subjects a little out of focus in behind
It looks like this to me as well. The lens looks like it got front focused here. The grass out in front looks pretty detailed.
monkey44 said:whothafunk said:Near $3000 for an APS-C haha. People with such nonlogical thinking should get off their unicorns.
If you read the post, that's not what it says ... some of you all 'think' you know what posts say, take one out of context, and then make idiotic remarks - like this one.
nvsravank said:Any mention of whether the metering will be linked to the AF point? That would be icing on the cake for me, but see no mention of it.
neuroanatomist said:nvsravank said:Any mention of whether the metering will be linked to the AF point? That would be icing on the cake for me, but see no mention of it.
I would suspect no, sadly.
Canon1 said:neuroanatomist said:nvsravank said:Any mention of whether the metering will be linked to the AF point? That would be icing on the cake for me, but see no mention of it.
I would suspect no, sadly.
Wish my 5d3 had this. I almost always shoot in manual mode because of inaccurate metering in many situations. This feature might make me lazy (and happy).
neuroanatomist said:Canon1 said:neuroanatomist said:nvsravank said:Any mention of whether the metering will be linked to the AF point? That would be icing on the cake for me, but see no mention of it.
I would suspect no, sadly.
Wish my 5d3 had this. I almost always shoot in manual mode because of inaccurate metering in many situations. This feature might make me lazy (and happy).
For a few thousand dollars more, you can be lazy and happy. Just buy a 1D X.
neuroanatomist said:Canon1 said:neuroanatomist said:nvsravank said:Any mention of whether the metering will be linked to the AF point? That would be icing on the cake for me, but see no mention of it.
I would suspect no, sadly.
Wish my 5d3 had this. I almost always shoot in manual mode because of inaccurate metering in many situations. This feature might make me lazy (and happy).
For a few thousand dollars more, you can be lazy and happy. Just buy a 1D X.