I think we could be ok just discussing the what ifs. It is fun, I agree.
But then you keep saying things like:
<So on one hand Canon shows innovative thinking. On the other, they seem to be stuck in the past.>
<But Canon could market it up and sell more cameras just like every other feature that no one uses.>
<Canon could add this feature to every new camera they sell and offer a firmware update to the existing bodies. Everyone thinks Canon is a hero and potentially their cameras get USED MORE and consequentially, they SELL MORE. They beat the competition to the punch with yet another innovative feature that no one else has.>
So which is it? You keep referring your ideas to the generation of more SALES. Which is wrong. It obviously won't generate more sales because if it would, that's what Canon would be doing. And they're not.
We can talk about what ifs, but you are actually the one that keeps translating this idea to more sales, not us. All we're trying to say is no, it won't translate to more sales.
But then you keep saying things like:
<So on one hand Canon shows innovative thinking. On the other, they seem to be stuck in the past.>
<But Canon could market it up and sell more cameras just like every other feature that no one uses.>
<Canon could add this feature to every new camera they sell and offer a firmware update to the existing bodies. Everyone thinks Canon is a hero and potentially their cameras get USED MORE and consequentially, they SELL MORE. They beat the competition to the punch with yet another innovative feature that no one else has.>
So which is it? You keep referring your ideas to the generation of more SALES. Which is wrong. It obviously won't generate more sales because if it would, that's what Canon would be doing. And they're not.
We can talk about what ifs, but you are actually the one that keeps translating this idea to more sales, not us. All we're trying to say is no, it won't translate to more sales.
Upvote
0