That's just the it, Canon had to put a plastic top plate on the 6D to get a wireless signal through, and GPS isn't magic, the same will apply. The only reason to include one and not the other is to sell a stupid plug-in adapter.
Upvote
0
AcutancePhotography said:It may also be that Nikon wants to consolidate the current D800 and D800E into one camera. It really did not make sense for Nikon to have both the 800 and 800E and perhaps by coming out with a "new" D800S instead of producing two separate but almost identical bodies is cheaper and a better business decision.
Very few people who currently have the D800 or D800 will be buying this new D800S unless they were already planning on getting another one. It just does not seem to be a good upgrade worth the money. Now if someone wants to move from a crop to a FF camera, going directly to the D800S makes sense.
ONe of the biggest differences is the incorporation of Wi-Fi which is of interest to some photographers but not to others. It will be interesting to see how well the WiFi works pushing out 41mb data files. Thats a lotta data!
gshocked said:It never made sense to me why Nikon made a D800 and an D800e.
From a consumers point of view it doesn't inspire confidence in the brand. Considering this If you just purchased a new D800 at the start of the year, it makes you wonder why your top of the line camera was replaced.
Is there something wrong with the current D800, is this like the D600 being replaced by the D610?
Or from a different perspective - it might put the D800 one up from the 5D3, as the the "newer"must have item.
It then repositions Nikon, to some consumers, as being the innovative company. While to others it screams new money machine.
gshocked said:It never made sense to me why Nikon made a D800 and an D800e.
AcutancePhotography said:gshocked said:It never made sense to me why Nikon made a D800 and an D800e.
I don't think Nikon thought they would sell as many D800E's as they did. I think they expected the majority of the D800 buyers to buy the D800 and only a relatively few buy the D800E. I still think that Nikon sold more D800's than D800E's, but I also think the sales of the D800E was higher than expected.
ahsanford said:lintoni said:New Nikon D800s... Why (in a forum named EOS Bodies)?
It's a development pipeline discussion, not a Nikon discussion.
- A
ahsanford said:AcutancePhotography said:gshocked said:It never made sense to me why Nikon made a D800 and an D800e.
I don't think Nikon thought they would sell as many D800E's as they did. I think they expected the majority of the D800 buyers to buy the D800 and only a relatively few buy the D800E. I still think that Nikon sold more D800's than D800E's, but I also think the sales of the D800E was higher than expected.
So was this representative of the mix of still vs. video shooters they have, i.e. is Nikon's user base more concerned about sharpness than moire? Do they simply lack a large video user base?
I wonder if a 5D3E -- a 5D3 without an AA filter -- was offered by Canon on day one alongside the 5D3, would we see all the videographers take the vanilla 5D3 and the still shooters all take the 5D3E?
Is it that simple a call? Are there downsides to pulling the AA filter other than moire? (Forgive me: the role of the AA filter is lost on me.)
- A