• The Canon Rumors Forum has officially been shut down as of July 10, 2026.

    All data will be deleted on September 16, 2026.

    the ad free experience will return by July 17, 2026.

Nikon to Announce 200-500mm Lens?

Canon Rumors

Who Dey
Canon Rumors Premium
Jul 20, 2010
12,874
5,707
279,596
Canada
www.canonrumors.com
HTML:
<p>A few patents showing optical formulas for a 200-500mm lens from Nikon have appeared.</p>
<p>Nikon Rumors reports that Nikon will indeed announce such a lens, though at present, the speed of the lens is unknown.</p>
<p>Canon is also <a href="http://www.canonrumors.com/2015/05/canon-developing-a-new-slower-supertelephoto-lens-cr2/" target="_blank">rumored to be developing a supertelephoto lens</a> with an aperture slower than f/4, it’s unknown if the development includes a zoom.</p>
<p>More to come…</p>
 
candyman said:
Would be nice to have a 400-800 zoom of Canon. But with profits dropping 16%, you wonder what that will do with R&D budget in the Camera section ::)

The high end lens business is a different market, and not impacted by the same factors as the low end business. A DO super zoom lens would also be interesting, but expensive. the issue is that Canon does not make lenses slower than f/5.6, and the 800mm L is already f/5.6, so such a zoom is going to be very large, even if DO.
 
Upvote 0
Mt Spokane Photography said:
candyman said:
Would be nice to have a 400-800 zoom of Canon. But with profits dropping 16%, you wonder what that will do with R&D budget in the Camera section ::)

The high end lens business is a different market, and not impacted by the same factors as the low end business. A DO super zoom lens would also be interesting, but expensive. the issue is that Canon does not make lenses slower than f/5.6, and the 800mm L is already f/5.6, so such a zoom is going to be very large, even if DO.

I see.
I better stop dreaming about it ;D ;D
 
Upvote 0
candyman said:
Mt Spokane Photography said:
candyman said:
Would be nice to have a 400-800 zoom of Canon. But with profits dropping 16%, you wonder what that will do with R&D budget in the Camera section ::)

The high end lens business is a different market, and not impacted by the same factors as the low end business. A DO super zoom lens would also be interesting, but expensive. the issue is that Canon does not make lenses slower than f/5.6, and the 800mm L is already f/5.6, so such a zoom is going to be very large, even if DO.

I see.
I better stop dreaming about it ;D ;D

That is one of the advantages of a small format sensors like 1 inch. The G3 X has a 24-600mm equivalent zoom and still gives a much better IQ than the very small sensor P&S cameras. The price is too high though. A person could buy a SL-1 plus a Tamron or Sigma long zoom for very little more. It would be much much larger though.
 
Upvote 0
Mt Spokane Photography said:
candyman said:
Mt Spokane Photography said:
candyman said:
Would be nice to have a 400-800 zoom of Canon. But with profits dropping 16%, you wonder what that will do with R&D budget in the Camera section ::)

The high end lens business is a different market, and not impacted by the same factors as the low end business. A DO super zoom lens would also be interesting, but expensive. the issue is that Canon does not make lenses slower than f/5.6, and the 800mm L is already f/5.6, so such a zoom is going to be very large, even if DO.

I see.
I better stop dreaming about it ;D ;D

That is one of the advantages of a small format sensors like 1 inch. The G3 X has a 24-600mm equivalent zoom and still gives a much better IQ than the very small sensor P&S cameras. The price is too high though. A person could buy a SL-1 plus a Tamron or Sigma long zoom for very little more. It would be much much larger though.
BTW G3x seems to outperform Tamron 150-600mm & Sony A7II combo at 600mm (in sharpness, at least).
http://www.canonrumors.com/forum/index.php?topic=27180.0
 
Upvote 0
The Canon 200-400+TC is technically already a variable aperture lens that goes out to 560mm. Even if Nikon makes a 500mm f5.6 zoom lens it'll still be inferior in focal length range.

If it cost a bit less than $12,000 I think people would forgive them though.
 
Upvote 0