Nikon's 2.300$ D750 said to best 5DIII

[Perio]

........ Let me clue you in on something: nature isn't built with photographers in mind.......

Um, nature, the world, everything in it, light, shadows, contrast, tonal gradations, compositional elements, all available instantly in infinite combinations, combinations that continually change with time of day, year, weather, viewer's mood and perspective, another combination available with a single step in any direction, words can never even begin to describe a single instant of our visual input to a blind person yet a click of the shutter can record and archive any instant to share with the sighted.
You are so wrong dilbert, nature is indeed symbiotic with photography, you have no cluing me in to do here, none.

......Flash systems? For 99%+ of my shots I don't use a flash.........

Shadows dilbert, your favorite topic and you and your use of your gear's inability to reproduce detail from shadows; shadows are places where light is reduced or blocked partially or entirely.
I think you could stand to learn some lighting techniques beyond simple, flash is one way shadows can, in a controlled manner, be exposed to light and exposed to your sensor.
...

LOL! That's so funny. I'm going to be nice and not say any more because you've said more than I expect you realize about yourself here.

In other TLR words, step up (buy your desired Exmor now) or step aside (grace us with your absence).

Nah, you'd miss me.

I'm sorry, I haven't paid too much attention to this thread but I'm not quite sure what exactly your point is. If you don't like Canon or you find it's inferior to its competitors (objectively or subjectively), then go ahead and buy Nikon/Sony etc. If you like WRX, that doesn't make S63 that someone likes a bad car, do you get my point? Choose whatever you like and stop arguing, as there is no sense in what you're talking. Don't you have other things to do in your life or people who need your attention or you're glad to waste your time/energy just for the sake of argument? If you have too much energy or too much free time, why don't you go and volunteer at the hospital or hospice? Trust me, many people would appreciate that.

EDIT: In reality, NOBODY gives a damn about what you (me, anyone else) use/buy/like etc. So, if you think people here would miss you, you're too naive. Get a real life and enjoy what you have. Many people don't have even a fraction of what you do.

 

[tolusina]

....

Here's one.

Visit http://www.luminous-landscape.com

The principal behind that website used to own and review a lot of Canon equipment. Going back as far as the EOS 1V. The 5DII was his last serious Canon camera.

Now, he not only doesn't own any but Canon products haven't feature on that website in many years now.

A quick search of LL shows that is indeed quite true.
That establishes the LL site as a place for partial and biased journalists which throws doubt on everything they publish.
Really? A photography site with regular gear features that excludes the market leader?
Thank you so much for bringing it to our attention that LL is so biased and dilbert approved.

You can quit any time before you get farther behind.

 

[ishdakuteb]

Visit http://www.luminous-landscape.com

The principal behind that website used to own and review a lot of Canon equipment. Going back as far as the EOS 1V. The 5DII was his last serious Canon camera.

Now, he not only doesn't own any but Canon products haven't feature on that website in many years now.

ah... i pretty much know this site since back in 2012, those days that i have started to learn using dslr, and registered to be a CR user to learn more from other members. i even know pretty much everyone in those workshop partners, especially jay maisel (famous about using color composition) and john paul caponigro (canon's light explorer leader), etc. the founder of the website is nikon user; i did not know that he really used/chose canon as his system...

ummm... i think i now remember he was talking about mirrorless in a video and as i remember he did flip-flop about mirrorless and not mirrorless. however, i am not a big fan of mirrorless since it is no more fun and challenge.

want to get a sure shot? video it and then extract a frame out of it... but i am calling this as a cheat

i do not use low iso, even i am shooting at noon. below images were taking at high noon and my iso is not 100, 200, or even 300. jay maisel hits street with iso 400 and up...

not even afraid of grabbing my canon 30d with 50mm f/1.4 for testing sport photography (today), still doable for the job but honestly still miss shots due to frame rate. again, one point auto focus instead of all...

note: sport photography is not really my interest, but heck... just for fun... why not...

 

[Sporgon]

Visit http://www.luminous-landscape.com

The principal behind that website used to own and review a lot of Canon equipment. Going back as far as the EOS 1V. The 5DII was his last serious Canon camera.

Now, he not only doesn't own any but Canon products haven't feature on that website in many years now.

ah... i pretty much know this site since back in 2012, those days that i have started to learn using dslr, and registered to be a CR user to learn more from other members. i even know pretty much everyone in those workshop partners, especially jay maisel (famous about using color composition) and john paul caponigro (canon's light explorer leader), etc. the founder of the website is nikon user; i did not know that he really used/chose canon as his system...

ummm... i think i now remember he was talking about mirrorless in a video and as i remember he did flip-flop about mirrorless and not mirrorless. however, i am not a big fan of mirrorless since it is no more fun and challenge.

want to get a sure shot? video it and then extract a frame out of it... but i am calling this as a cheat

i do not use low iso, even i am shooting at noon. below images were taking at high noon and my iso is not 100, 200, or even 300. jay maisel hits street with iso 400 and up...

not even afraid of grabbing my canon 30d with 50mm f/1.4 for testing sport photography (today), still doable for the job but honestly still miss shots due to frame rate. again, one point auto focus instead of all...

note: sport photography is not really my interest, but heck... just for fun... why not...

But ishdakuteb, if you are going to take part in this debate you must play fair; comparing the D30 is not playing fair as everyone knows the older Canons were much better than the new ones and Sony / Nikon latest offerings are aimed at being better than Canons latest offerings, not those from 2006.

Nice pictures by the way !

 

[ishdakuteb]

...
Visit http://www.luminous-landscape.com
...

...the founder of the website is nikon user; i did not know that he really used/chose canon as his system...

He used to use Canon as his system. He no longer does.

And on Canon's Explorers of Light...

http://www.d-65.com/blog/coming-home-to-nikon-the-story-behind-the-story/

Canon isn't what they used to be.

please think twice before saying, luminous-landscape is NOT owned by seth resnick, but michael reimann is. however, seth resnick is a co-owner of d-65.

 

[Vgramatikov]

d750 for sure best the 5d3 in the sensor performance more or less at base iso`s. As we known mostly at DR shadow recovery ability. That`s it...Some tweaks at high iso`s nothing new.
1/4000 max shutter speed, no AF button, equivalent af as d810 like 5d3 equiv as 1dx.

So we all do not need big talking here...

I`m Canon user now i think d750 are late filling the hole of missing the real d700 successor.

Still d750 have market for those who have d800 or old d3s,d700 and looking for weeding or wildlife, sports camera.

All other users already have d610,d800/E/d810 and d4 camera.

Little confusing here in the Nikon full frame line...and still some tweaks and misunderstandings can be found on cameras as Nikon DF and Nikon d750. Now i think Nikon are just tweaking existed technologies and sensors and make some marketing in order to rise they sells ....

I think Nikon users need the d750 with more frame rate as 8fps 16mp 4d sensor ..just lighter and cheaper d4 as d700 was the cheaper d3.

Again they will have just different story.

Nikon d810 was the one body who make sense these days and this body really eat the DF and d750 market.

For me is hard to understand...the idea of the 750d side by side d810 and DF.

 

[ishdakuteb]

What you've said here is that Michael Reimann is owned by Seth Resnick. Is that what you wanted to say?

I said exactly what I wanted to say. Note the spacing for paragraphs.

ANSWER TO YOUR QUESTION IS: NO, THAT NOT WHAT I SAID... LOL...

luminous-landscape is NOT owned by seth resnick, instead it is owned by michael reimann according to my understanding... but who care...