L
Loswr
Guest
CanonGuy said:neuroanatomist said:CanonGuy said:The 50L definitely needs an update asap. Among the modern lenses, it's just a prehistoric dinosaur right now. The 50 art is leaps and bounds ahead sharpness wise. Buying this lens at that price is just a complete rip off.
I didn't know sharpness was the most important characteristic of a lens. I'm so glad you're here to educate all of us on what aspects of image quality we should find most important. I guess we've foolishly thought that things like bokeh and color rendering matter. Thanks for setting us straight!
Not that sharpness is unimportant, but some people treat it as the sole criterion for evaluating lens performance, probably because reducing a complex set of objective and subjective parameters to a simple, uncomplicated number makes it easier for simple, uncomplicated minds to grasp.
It's always nice to see delusional people who are extreme fanboys toopeople like you are an asset to a company like canon who's moto is to move like Turtle and milk customers as long as they can. And Nah... Some people can't ever be educated
I just mentioned sharpness for sake of argument. Here it's for you: horrible CA, slow AF, inaccurate AF, curved focus plane needs to be fixed in that prehistoric garbage lens as well. Hope you are happy nowI guess all those garbage aspects of this lens makes an image artistic for you
![]()
Hard to be unhappy with such logic as yours. The 50L has inaccurate AF? Don't hear that too often...but you were praising the Sigma 50 Art, which has a reputation for stellar AF accuracy.
Curved focus plane? When you figure out the difference between field curvature and focus shift, by all means let me know, mmmmkay? :
Upvote
0