• The Canon Rumors Forum has officially been shut down as of July 10, 2026.

    All data will be deleted on September 16, 2026.

    the ad free experience will return by July 17, 2026.

NY Trip Equipment. Thoughts?

Jan 22, 2012
4,814
1,596
40,538
Time to select equipment for the trip. The best part before the trip. Lol.
I am thinking of taking the following. You PLEASE advice.
1. 5d3. (Was earlier thinking not taking this but buying the 5dr. Now not so inclined)
2. 16-35 f4 IS - Daytime wide angle.
3. 24-105 f4 IS - Daytime walk around.
4. 85mm f1.2 for night Manhattan. :)
5. 35mm f2 IS for night handheld shots.
6. Arca head with light weight Gitzo tripod.

Undecided:
1. Zeiss 35 1.4 for tripod night city shots, stars if I end up going camping.
2. 70-200 mm. I like the range but will be so heavy for full day trips.
3. I have the 24-70 2.8 II as well but am favoring the 24-105 because of reach and IS. Mistake?

Anything I should add/delete?

Sorry also am taking Sony RX1003 for restaurants etc.

Appreciate your thoughts.
 
I like your choices. I'm intrigued by your intended use of the 85L II -- what types of shots would you need that lens for? Just curious.

Lens selection is a personal thing. Ask 10 people, and you're more likely to get 10 different answers. I would leave the Zeiss 35 at home and make due with the 35 f/2 IS (the extra lens is not worth the weight and space for a camping excursion that is not certain). Lacking the hard infinity stop will take some trial and error to dial in, but once it's set, it's set. I would also swap the 24-105 for the 24-70 II especially if you decide to bring a 70-xxx zoom. The zoom would have limited use in NYC (river shots, cityscapes from the top of a skyscraper, etc.) but it'd see a lot more use once you get out of NYC. I'd opt for the 70-300L because it is lighter and more compact than the 70-200, but if didn't have access to that then I'd bring the 70-200. Losing the 100-200 (with extender) mm focal length range is ok for a day trip, but if you're going on a weeklong+ trip, I'd find a way to bring the longer zoom. I might leave it in the car or hotel room, but it'd make it on the plane. :) Oh, and make sure your insurance is in place. :)
 
Upvote 0
Thank you Random Orbits.
85 is for people in their element on the neon lit roads. :)
Yes I agree about the Zeiss being omitted. I was thinking of night city scape with the lens at 1.4 and low ISO. Also on 4th of July. But I am sure f2 will work fine just as well.
So resistant at including 70-200 because of weight. I do not have the 70-300 unfortunately. I will be in NY for 2 weeks.
Thinking...
 
Upvote 0
For ultra-wide angle, you can always stitch stuff together when you get home.

BTW, when I went to NYC I was told to forget about the Empire State Building as the lineups were not worth it. As I walked past on the street, I saw an empty roped-off area that looked like a waiting area, so I went inside and asked about the wait and was told there is none... so I continued through the lobby and up to a large empty room obviously used to cue up for the wait.... with nobody in it. I walked straight to security, then straight to the elevator... got out, walked into the second elevator, and out onto the top.... could not have taken even 5 minutes....

The view from the top was impressive.
 

Attachments

  • EmpireNorth.jpg
    EmpireNorth.jpg
    3.8 MB · Views: 198
  • EmpireSouth.jpg
    EmpireSouth.jpg
    3.6 MB · Views: 183
Upvote 0
sanj said:
Time to select equipment for the trip. The best part before the trip. Lol.
I am thinking of taking the following. You PLEASE advice.
1. 5d3. (Was earlier thinking not taking this but buying the 5dr. Now not so inclined)
2. 16-35 f4 IS - Daytime wide angle.
3. 24-105 f4 IS - Daytime walk around.
4. 85mm f1.2 for night Manhattan. :)
5. 35mm f2 IS for night handheld shots.
6. Arca head with light weight Gitzo tripod.

Undecided:
1. Zeiss 35 1.4 for tripod night city shots, stars if I end up going camping.
2. 70-200 mm. I like the range but will be so heavy for full day trips.
3. I have the 24-70 2.8 II as well but am favoring the 24-105 because of reach and IS. Mistake?

Anything I should add/delete?

Sorry also am taking Sony RX1003 for restaurants etc.

Appreciate your thoughts.
Have you considered a monopod instead of the tripod? You can use a monopod in areas where tripods are discouraged (museums and such). Mine is a combination hiking pole/monopod. It has a walnut ball on the top that screws off to reveal a camera mount....

Helpful hint.... when walking through security, use it as a cane, limp slightly, and mutter "arthritis".....
 
Upvote 0
I would get:

2 5D3s (to avoid changing lenses all the time*)
TS-E 17 (so many tall buildings...)
24-70 2.8 (best iq walkaround lens)
70-200 f/4 IS (light and sharp)
tripod (night shots)

Nothing else

* Murphy's law can still strike: 2 cameras with 3 lenses... you know the rest ;D
 
Upvote 0