• The Canon Rumors Forum has officially been shut down as of July 10, 2026.

    All data will be deleted on September 16, 2026.

    the ad free experience will return by July 17, 2026.

Official: Sigma 24-105mm f/4 DG OS

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: 82mm

LetTheRightLensIn said:
True, but the point he made still stands. A typical 50-55mm f/1.4 has a 58mm filter size. 77mm is huge for a 55mm f/1.4.

It seems lots of these lenses that do better at the edges than before are having extra larger fronts (70-300L, 24-70 II, 55mm Otus, etc.).
When the Zeiss 55 was first announced, many people believed that the only way to create superior IQ from the lens was if it had a huge image circle and only used the central (best) part. I'm guessing that is a realistic possibility and might be what many of the "oversized" 77 / 82mm lenses are doing.
 
Upvote 0
Re: 82mm

mackguyver said:
When the Zeiss 55 was first announced, many people believed that the only way to create superior IQ from the lens was if it had a huge image circle and only used the central (best) part. I'm guessing that is a realistic possibility and might be what many of the "oversized" 77 / 82mm lenses are doing.

That doesn't seem to have helped edge of frame on the Sigma 50mm 1.4 though. I believe that has a 77 front end.
 
Upvote 0
Re: 82mm

mackguyver said:
Eldar said:
Rick said:
The Zeiss Otus 55mm f1.4 has an 82mm filter size too.
... I believe the Otus 55/1.4 is a 77mm.
Yep:
Otus_1.4_55_ZE_horizontal_Lensshade-622x413.jpg

The quote "The new 82mm front element was designed to produce sharpness across the entire frame " was copy/pasted directly form the Zeiss website, but I see in the pic the 77mm thread. Can the front element be 82mm while the thread is 77? Just curious. :)
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.