Official: Sigma 24-105mm f/4 DG OS

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: 82mm

LetTheRightLensIn said:
True, but the point he made still stands. A typical 50-55mm f/1.4 has a 58mm filter size. 77mm is huge for a 55mm f/1.4.

It seems lots of these lenses that do better at the edges than before are having extra larger fronts (70-300L, 24-70 II, 55mm Otus, etc.).
When the Zeiss 55 was first announced, many people believed that the only way to create superior IQ from the lens was if it had a huge image circle and only used the central (best) part. I'm guessing that is a realistic possibility and might be what many of the "oversized" 77 / 82mm lenses are doing.
 
Upvote 0
Re: 82mm

mackguyver said:
When the Zeiss 55 was first announced, many people believed that the only way to create superior IQ from the lens was if it had a huge image circle and only used the central (best) part. I'm guessing that is a realistic possibility and might be what many of the "oversized" 77 / 82mm lenses are doing.

That doesn't seem to have helped edge of frame on the Sigma 50mm 1.4 though. I believe that has a 77 front end.
 
Upvote 0
Re: 82mm

mackguyver said:
Eldar said:
Rick said:
The Zeiss Otus 55mm f1.4 has an 82mm filter size too.
... I believe the Otus 55/1.4 is a 77mm.
Yep:
Otus_1.4_55_ZE_horizontal_Lensshade-622x413.jpg

The quote "The new 82mm front element was designed to produce sharpness across the entire frame " was copy/pasted directly form the Zeiss website, but I see in the pic the 77mm thread. Can the front element be 82mm while the thread is 77? Just curious. :)
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.