Patent: Canon camera with in-body stabilization and in-lens stabilization working together.
- Thread starter Canon Rumors Guy
- Start date
I'd be happy if it becomes 75 percent as good as the Olympus or Panasonic M43 IBIS + OIS system. The A7 III and Nikon Z6 IBIS+OIS is alright, but they just don't compare to the competition.
When Canon does implement anything they do it right. I wonder when....
It may only work with RF lenses as it needs the lens and the body to collaborate. I wonder if they will allow any IBIS at all if an EF lens is mounted.
Same opinion here.
Will be interesting how well this will work compared to other companies solutions (e.g. Panasonic).
I can't imagine them disabling IBIS for non-IS EF lenses. That would go against everything they've done so far to make the adapter fully functional for EF lenses. They also seem to be leaning heavily on EF for affordable lenses at the moment.
I do agree that the EF mount may not have enough throughput to coordinate OIS+IBIS, so there may be a limitation there with EF lenses.
- Touch bar for EOS R
- EyeAF for EOS R before the FW update. Just S-AF
- Video for FF DSLR/mirrorless - mostly cropped
- Sensor.
- EVF
They do a good job but certainty not ALWAYS the best or the cheapest.
Last edited:
Possibility: Dual IS is enabled with RF lenses, but EF lenses must use either OIS or IBIS (but not both)?
How dare you insult Sony! Sacrilege!
Wouldn't it be easier to test trail Ibis on an apsc m body, smaller sensor, like that rumored M5ii. Then trickle up the tech to the R?
EF IS seems to work the same no matter the body (that's my recollection, am I forgetting something?) which would mean the lens has a CPU that reads its sensors and moves its IS group without the camera being involved.
And if that's the case then it will be trying to fix everything, leaving nothing that the IBIS could do better.
Are EF lenses even firmware-upgradeable? I've already upgraded an RF lens and never upgraded any EF since getting into Canon in 1996.
One possibility is that the IBIS could at least correct roll with an EF lens, which optical IS in a lens absolutely cannot.
The most important question now is "WHEN"?
Once I see a reliable eye-autofocus, dual card slots and dependable IBIS with an improved sensor, I'll probably buy but who can say whether I will ever see that time before I close my eyes for the last time.
Once I see a reliable eye-autofocus, dual card slots and dependable IBIS with an improved sensor, I'll probably buy but who can say whether I will ever see that time before I close my eyes for the last time.
Might as well get it out of the way.
“Canon is doomed”
“Canon’s IBIS technology is already 5 years behind”
“I’m switching to Sony”
“Too expensive”
“No 4K full frame”
“If 4K full frame, not even 8k”
“This camera isn’t also a car”
Am I missing any?
“Canon is doomed”
“Canon’s IBIS technology is already 5 years behind”
“I’m switching to Sony”
“Too expensive”
“No 4K full frame”
“If 4K full frame, not even 8k”
“This camera isn’t also a car”
Am I missing any?
Last edited:
Well, the other guys havE IBIS that will work with any lens, and one of the selling points for IBIS is that is a way of stabilizing lenses that don't have internal stabilization. Canon's implementation may work better with RF lenses, but my guess is that it will work with all lenses, like the other guys cameras.
Well, there are the random and incoherent rants about how how Canon rips off its customers
What ever happened to "still no updated 50mm" ?
I would hope that with EF lenses that do not have IS that the IBIS works as well as other attachments. If they have IS I am fine if the IBIS does not come on as the EF lenses have less contacts for data transfer and this might limit what they can do. If Canon gets it for EF lenses though as well as the RF lenses that would to me be just a bonus as The IS is pretty incredible anyway.
