Patent: Noise & Aliasing Reduction for Small Pixels

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: Patent: Noise & Aliasing Reduction for Small Pixels

I read thru the patent as well.
It pertains to the need to read data from a large mp sensor without overwhelming the buffer memory with huge quantities of data. Typical thinning methods cause a color stripe, this one is designed to avoid that.

This allows for more images to be captured before a buffer fills, obviously a issue for a large mp camera.

Expect this to be used in a high mp camera, its basically firmware.

The patent number is actually 2013-012850, Igami dropped the leading zero.

Here is a quote from the translated text.

__________________________
[Problem to be solved by the invention]
[0005]
It is necessary to memorize a picture signal by four plains of R/G1/G2/B, and to memorize the picture signal of each plain for every frequency band further in the technology of a Patent document 2. Therefore, a mass memory is needed and it is not preferable in respect of cost. Since there are also many required amounts of memory access, when rapidity, such as continuous shooting, is the processings called for, there is a possibility of reaching the maximum of a memory access zone and causing deterioration of processing speed.
[0006]
In order to ease this problem, it is possible to, apply the thinning technology of a chrominance signal as shown in a Patent document 1 to the composition of a Patent document 2 for example, and to reduce required memory space and the amount of memory access.
[0007]
However, in order to interpolate the thinned-out chrominance signal in the technology of a Patent document 1 from the chrominance signal of an adjacent pixel and to restore, a difference arises in the frequency band of a chrominance signal, and the frequency band of a luminance signal, and there is a problem that the color stripe not existing will occur in an object.
 
Upvote 0
Re: Patent: Noise & Aliasing Reduction for Small Pixels

Perhaps "small pixels" are those on the tiny sensors in the point/shoot cameras? In the global scale of things, APS-C sensors have fairly large pixels...
 
Upvote 0
Re: Patent: Noise & Aliasing Reduction for Small Pixels

Etienne said:
When your production skills outgrow the 5DIII, you should be looking at a C300, C500, or Sony FS700, because there isn't anything better in it's price range. ... oh ...and it shoots great stills as well.

Maybe you're not counting the gh2 because it's $2000 cheaper..? And it comes nowhere close to the BMC Camera, which is the same price (but very hard to come by). The 5D3 is a great stills cam, arguably the best stills cam in it's price range (i think it is). But it's video is mediocre at best.
 
Upvote 0
Re: Patent: Noise & Aliasing Reduction for Small Pixels

HurtinMinorKey said:
Maybe you're not counting the gh2 because it's $2000 cheaper..? And it comes nowhere close to the BMC Camera, which is the same price (but very hard to come by). The 5D3 is a great stills cam, arguably the best stills cam in it's price range (i think it is). But it's video is mediocre at best.
One of the things that gets lost in those translations though is sensor size. Both your other examples are working with 2x or 2.4x crop factors; and while the film world is pretty used to not having as shallow a depth of field as the 5dIII can accomplish, it does still have that advantage.

I haven't seen tests, but, I would like to see the 3 compared in lower light scenes. The cameras being cheap is only useful if you aren't spending a ton of money on lighting, etc; so being able to operate in fairly low, natural light would be another plus on the Canon side.

But man, the image the BMCC puts out is pretty impressive
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.