Architect1776
Defining the poetics of space through Architecture
I was looking for the M5 MII with IBIS. I want a built in viewfinder.
Other camera will be an RF mount when they get IBIS.
Until then my 7D and 10D are doing just fine.
Upvote
0
Ok, two high end Canon DSLRs do. Maybe a 6D? No other high end or lower cameras have GPS, so why would it be expected in a 90D or 6DII? So the comment about no GPS because its 2019 just doesn’t apply to Canon. It seems like Canon has actually done more than other manufacturers regarding inclusion of GPS at least in some models.
You do know the M cameras can take all the same lenses as the 7D, and more, right? I've been shooting with the M and M6, and 7D and 7DII for years now. The 70-200 F2.8L IS II is most often on my 7DII. It also works perfectly well on the M6. The adapter adds a tiny amount of weight and length, but since the camera body is so much smaller than the 7DII, the whole combo is still smaller. If and when the sports AF in an M body matches or exceed the 7DII, I will gladly use that M with my 70-200 instead of the 7DII. I already prefer the AF in the M6 over that in the 7DII for everything except sports (and it does OK for sports).Other than some recently announced RF lenses the current catalog just ain't there (28-70mm, 50, 85, 24-105).
Still a long ways to go for a comparable sports/action selection like the one already in existence for EF/EF-S cameras.
How about the M mount? No way in hell a current 7D owner is changing his current EF gear for a mirrorless version
of the camera with that "soccer dad" selection of lenses.
Please would one of you camera gurus provide me with some advice.
At the moment my main camera is a 5D mk4, and I also have a 5D mk3 that I kept as a spare body when I bought the mk4. In practice I hardly ever use my 5D mk3 as the mk4 is always my first choice for studio work and all other serious projects. However, my 5D mk4 is not a good choice for sports and I have been thinking about trading it in for the 90D for its faster burst rate and the additional reach that the crop sensor would give me with my telephoto lenses. The only thing that is holding me back is a worry that the APS-C sensor might not give me the quality I am used to with my 5D mk3. Also it feels like a downgrade going from a professional body to a camera that is more of a consumer product.
I really hope Canon has stepped up their high iso noise performance on this sensor. They're severely lagging behind the likes of the D7500.I'd wait for the reviews on the sensor's quality. Presumably it's the new Canon's sensor so there's hope it's better than 5DIV or at least the same.
However, why trade 5DIV for 90D? Trade your 5DIII for 90D. I guess 5DIV and 90D will be a great combo.
Please would one of you camera gurus provide me with some advice.
At the moment my main camera is a 5D mk4, and I also have a 5D mk3 that I kept as a spare body when I bought the mk4. In practice I hardly ever use my 5D mk3 as the mk4 is always my first choice for studio work and all other serious projects. However, my 5D mk4 is not a good choice for sports and I have been thinking about trading it in for the 90D for its faster burst rate and the additional reach that the crop sensor would give me with my telephoto lenses. The only thing that is holding me back is a worry that the APS-C sensor might not give me the quality I am used to with my 5D mk3. Also it feels like a downgrade going from a professional body to a camera that is more of a consumer product.
Does anyone have any experience of moving from a full frame camera to a good quality APSC camera such as a 7D mk 2 or an 80D? If so, is it something you would recommend or would I be better off staying with what I have?
Not everyone needs 50 lenses. Some people are happy with 2 or 3. The M can be perfect for a light travel setup. Just some of the lenses:
22mm, 11-22, 32mm, Sigma 16mm 1.4, Samyang 12mm, Sigma 56mm, 100 or 60mm macro and maybe a 70-200 F4 adapted.
These are all the lenses i would need.
I agree tho that Sony is in better position by having 2 mounts perfectly compatible, just like Canon had with EF and EFs
Not everyone needs 50 lenses. Some people are happy with 2 or 3. The M can be perfect for a light travel setup. Just some of the lenses:
22mm, 11-22, 32mm, Sigma 16mm 1.4, Samyang 12mm, Sigma 56mm, 100 or 60mm macro and maybe a 70-200 F4 adapted.
These are all the lenses i would need.
I agree tho that Sony is in better position by having 2 mounts perfectly compatible, just like Canon had with EF and EFs