param said:Waterfall Autumn
troy19 said:param said:Waterfall Autumn
That is beautiful. Beautiful colors and beautiful composition. What camera/lens combination did you use? Any post processing?
param said:troy19 said:param said:Waterfall Autumn
That is beautiful. Beautiful colors and beautiful composition. What camera/lens combination did you use? Any post processing?
Shot with 5D3 + 70-200 f2.8 IS II
4 sec at f/32 ISO 100 200mm
Basic post in lightroom 4 to boost the oranges and greens, then applied some filters in color efex pro. I think i used pro contrast + sunlight filters on this one.
troy19 said:param said:troy19 said:param said:Waterfall Autumn
That is beautiful. Beautiful colors and beautiful composition. What camera/lens combination did you use? Any post processing?
Shot with 5D3 + 70-200 f2.8 IS II
4 sec at f/32 ISO 100 200mm
Basic post in lightroom 4 to boost the oranges and greens, then applied some filters in color efex pro. I think i used pro contrast + sunlight filters on this one.
Thanks param for the explanation. You made the best out of the scene. Again: good eye!
revup67 said:Param..a very fine shot indeed - this is a good example of where the loss of IQ at a smaller F-stop (F32) is pretty much meaningless. I've heard this issued raised before and though it is true IQ lessens beyond say F10 or so in some cases where shutter speed is shorter. With this one it is somewhat irrelevant as the longer exposure absorbs more definition. On a side note (not being contradictory but to end off the possibility of greater diffraction at such a small F stop) did you consider using an ND on this shot to use a wider F-stop vs. F32? Possibly dropping down the ISO to 50 to get additional slow down if using a wider Av. Again, just a thought.
I think they are great. Specially the first one. I have a question for you. Did you intentionally post R G B pictures?Destin said:I know this is a Canon forum but I'm hoping there is a bit of leniency on the photos, because well.... they aren't Canon. Nor Photoshopped or manipulated for that matter. They're just good old fashion film landscape photography.
http://www.destinsparks.com
Am I missing something here? Isn't everything out of my camera AND on the web RGB? As opposed to CMYK(?), which is for print work....no?rpt said:I think they are great. Specially the first one. I have a question for you. Did you intentionally post R G B pictures?Destin said:I know this is a Canon forum but I'm hoping there is a bit of leniency on the photos, because well.... they aren't Canon. Nor Photoshopped or manipulated for that matter. They're just good old fashion film landscape photography.
http://www.destinsparks.com
infared said:Am I missing something here? Isn't everything out of my camera AND on the web RGB? As opposed to CMYK(?), which is for print work....no?rpt said:I think they are great. Specially the first one. I have a question for you. Did you intentionally post R G B pictures?Destin said:I know this is a Canon forum but I'm hoping there is a bit of leniency on the photos, because well.... they aren't Canon. Nor Photoshopped or manipulated for that matter. They're just good old fashion film landscape photography.
http://www.destinsparks.com
infared said:Am I missing something here? Isn't everything out of my camera AND on the web RGB? As opposed to CMYK(?), which is for print work....no?rpt said:I think they are great. Specially the first one. I have a question for you. Did you intentionally post R G B pictures?Destin said:I know this is a Canon forum but I'm hoping there is a bit of leniency on the photos, because well.... they aren't Canon. Nor Photoshopped or manipulated for that matter. They're just good old fashion film landscape photography.
http://www.destinsparks.com