probably not in my near future buy, I have a 150-600 Sigma.. seems like less range, is the image quality that much better?
For me? Yes. Most folks are saying that it’s better than the 100-400L II and that lens is already better than the Sigma IMO.
I prefer the 100-400L II and a teleconverter, or the 100-400L II naked and a crop to anything I’ve ever seen come out of the Sigma. Just my opinion.
I’ve also read that the Sigma isn’t actually 600mm on the long end - it’s closer to 550mm, but I haven’t verified that myself so YMMV.
Last edited:
Upvote
0