Sell canon 5d3 and return new macbook pro retina to buy the 1d x

[KKCFamilyman]

I have always wanted the 1d x but am unsure the extra $3k is worth it for me. The pro's for me are better iso in low light and af point metering. Cons size and could that money get me a nice 35 mm prime and maybe a 1.4iii teleconverter and keep my macbook. Just stuck on the decision. Any suggestions?

 

[verysimplejason]

If it were me, I'd stick with 5D3. 1DX and 5D3 got the same AF (almost). As for low light performance, 1DX is just a little bit better. I suggest getting 1DX only if more than 6fps performance is crucial to you. Your macbook is also important since it is so good to edit raw files using mac. If I were you, I'd like a good TS-E lens instead of the 35 though.

 

[Loswr]

I love my 1D X, but in you're position I'd just stick with the excellent 5DIII.

 

[KKCFamilyman]

If it were me, I'd stick with 5D3. 1DX and 5D3 got the same AF (almost). As for low light performance, 1DX is just a little bit better. I suggest getting 1DX only if more than 6fps performance is crucial to you. Your macbook is also important since it is so good to edit raw files using mac. If I were you, I'd like a good TS-E lens instead of the 35 though.

Sorry if this sounds stupid but what would be the application for a ts-e?

 

[Vivid Color]

I think you should also consider the money you will lose by selling the 5d3. And whether you can get by without the laptop. Finally, consider getting a battery grip, which will make your 5d3 a little bit 1dx-like.

 

[Mt Spokane Photography]

If it were me, I'd stick with 5D3. 1DX and 5D3 got the same AF (almost). As for low light performance, 1DX is just a little bit better. I suggest getting 1DX only if more than 6fps performance is crucial to you. Your macbook is also important since it is so good to edit raw files using mac. If I were you, I'd like a good TS-E lens instead of the 35 though.

Sorry if this sounds stupid but what would be the application for a ts-e?

Its a good question, a TS is a specialized lens why would someone recommend it for you instead of a 35mm lens without knowing what use you would have for it??

 

[spinworkxroy]

Personally for me, if I had to sell so many things just to get what I want, it just means that thing is beyond my means and I should not get it.

 

[RS2021]

If you have never owned a 1 series body, go to a shop, hold the 1DX and play with it a bit...

Yes, 1DX is a outstanding camera, but it is also large, obvious, and hefty. Unless photographic needs actually exist, it really would be an overkill for most nonprofessionals. For you 5D3 probably will do 90% of what 1DX will do and you could spend the extra cash on some nice L glass.

Cheers.

 

[KKCFamilyman]

Yeah i was going thru some recent photo's and the 5d is great. I think i will take that advice and get a prime just not sure of the sigma 35mm or canon 50mm1.2l seems like 35mm could prove useful also wondering if I should get the 16-35. Would that serve a purpose up close of family portraits?

 

[RGF]

Aside from the pleasure of a 1D series body, why the 1Dx? Do you need 12 FPS or the difference in high ISO between the 5DM3 (which is a great camera - I prefer it over my 1DM4)?

Unless there is a compelling reason, or the expected pleasure from owning 1Dx is very high, I would stick with the 5DM3 and macbook pro retina.

 

[RMC33]

Honestly keep the 5D3 +MBP. Unless you neeeeeeed all the customization that the 1Dx offers I find my 5D3 to be a GREAT body (sometimes better) then my 1Dx. Editing photos on a MBP retina is great too... I won't do it on my PC any more.

 

[KKCFamilyman]

Aside from the pleasure of a 1D series body, why the 1Dx? Do you need 12 FPS or the difference in high ISO between the 5DM3 (which is a great camera - I prefer it over my 1DM4)?

Unless there is a compelling reason, or the expected pleasure from owning 1Dx is very high, I would stick with the 5DM3 and macbook pro retina.

Yeah those were my thoughts about better iso performance in the 400-12800 range and better metering finally it sounds like there is more to work with in editing raws. Ie shadows. The cost and added weight are the major cons.

 

[verysimplejason]

If it were me, I'd stick with 5D3. 1DX and 5D3 got the same AF (almost). As for low light performance, 1DX is just a little bit better. I suggest getting 1DX only if more than 6fps performance is crucial to you. Your macbook is also important since it is so good to edit raw files using mac. If I were you, I'd like a good TS-E lens instead of the 35 though.

Sorry if this sounds stupid but what would be the application for a ts-e?

Its a good question, a TS is a specialized lens why would someone recommend it for you instead of a 35mm lens without knowing what use you would have for it??

Sorry but I assume that since he's already into full frame that a TS would be a good upgrade for his lenses at least if he's into landscapes and architectures. If not, then go for a 35mm.

 

[TexPhoto]

Sell the Macbook, 5D3, and your children to buy a 1DX. It is awesome.

Were you going to shoot pictures with this thing? Can you share with us what you might shoot photos of?

 

[robbymack]

Dude not less than 2 months ago you were ready to trade it all for a micro 4/3 or nex or something lighter. My advice, be happy, and keep shooting.

 

[pedro]

You mentioned to add a 16-35 to your lens line up. Might be a good move according to what you already have. And I'd second the thought of some others here: Keep the 5D3. Mine is an excellent cam and my topline budget wise. Whenever you have to sell things for some new toy...don't do it. I will go for a 16-35 these next few weeks and then I'll be quite done lenswise.

 

[Skulker]

I love my 1D X, but in you're position I'd just stick with the excellent 5DIII.

+1 also love my 1Dx and wouldn't part with it out of choice. But the 5d3 is also a great camera and unless you need the 12 fps its unlikely the other (many) advantages will be worth the money.

 

[FunPhotons]

I'd definitely consider it. I personally think the Retina mac laptops pure helium. Can't upgrade the hard drive, can't upgrade the RAM, cost $3500 for what I'd consider a minimum computer. I have one of the first MBP Unibodies and I just upgraded the RAM and drive to a SSD.

My next body is going to be a 1D (notice I didn't say X), hopefully with a lot of pixels.

 

[J.R.]

I have always wanted the 1d x but am unsure the extra $3k is worth it for me. The pro's for me are better iso in low light and af point metering. Cons size and could that money get me a nice 35 mm prime and maybe a 1.4iii teleconverter and keep my macbook. Just stuck on the decision. Any suggestions?

I was glad you kept your gear - http://www.canonrumors.com/forum/index.php?topic=12123.msg215823#msg215823 - but if you were thinking your current gear was tough to lug around, the 1dx will make it even tougher.

Don't you like the 5d3? If not, by all means get the 1DX, OTW it may be better to get a couple of super-fast primes.

IMHO based on what you say you shoot, it is likely that spending an additional $3,000 will lead to more remorse than satisfaction. Don't do it!

 

[KKCFamilyman]

I have always wanted the 1d x but am unsure the extra $3k is worth it for me. The pro's for me are better iso in low light and af point metering. Cons size and could that money get me a nice 35 mm prime and maybe a 1.4iii teleconverter and keep my macbook. Just stuck on the decision. Any suggestions?

I was glad you kept your gear - http://www.canonrumors.com/forum/index.php?topic=12123.msg215823#msg215823 - but if you were thinking your current gear was tough to lug around, the 1dx will make it even tougher.

Don't you like the 5d3? If not, by all means get the 1DX, OTW it may be better to get a couple of super-fast primes.

IMHO based on what you say you shoot, it is likely that spending an additional $3,000 will lead to more remorse than satisfaction. Don't do it!

I do but just wanted the better low light performance of the 1d x but it sounds smarter to keep it and add somemore lenses. I also think ill explore my wireless flah capabilities.