Re: Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 OS Art Pricing & Availability to be Announced Shortly
1. Sigma 35 Art, 50 Art AF misbehavior: unfortunately, the issue is due to the lens AF module design shortcomings, less evident in good light situation, with centre AF point selected and AF priority set to accuracy rather than speed. Far from being perfect though.
Sigma 85 Art and 135 Art are completely different animals in that regard. AF of these lenses is rock solid or as good as it gets.
2. rings issue: caused by the in camera Peripheral illumination correction enabled. AFAIK, this is more camera firmware than lens related. has not been fixed to date.I have heard of Tamron primes being also problematic in that regard.
3. depending on your shoting style and if you can afford an odd missed shot or two out of 10
, I would argue that Sigma 50 Art is a very good glass. Shooting in Live View mode takes care of the issue nicely of course.
There are other options: Tamron 45 VC is one of those. Not a bad lens, at all. Many people swear by their Tamron 45 VC glass, I have seen some good reviews. Personally I saw no value in Tamron VC primes being a bit of a uninspiring, ordinary glass for my personal taste ( I am going to get flamed for this heresy pretty badly).
There is some nice Zeiss options but those are all manual focusing glass. kind of defeat the purpose for me.
you can source virtualy unused and still under warranty Sigma 50 Art these days at around A$650 on Gumtree in
Australia. I see them poping up quite regularly.
1. Sigma 35 Art, 50 Art AF misbehavior: unfortunately, the issue is due to the lens AF module design shortcomings, less evident in good light situation, with centre AF point selected and AF priority set to accuracy rather than speed. Far from being perfect though.
Sigma 85 Art and 135 Art are completely different animals in that regard. AF of these lenses is rock solid or as good as it gets.
2. rings issue: caused by the in camera Peripheral illumination correction enabled. AFAIK, this is more camera firmware than lens related. has not been fixed to date.I have heard of Tamron primes being also problematic in that regard.
3. depending on your shoting style and if you can afford an odd missed shot or two out of 10
There are other options: Tamron 45 VC is one of those. Not a bad lens, at all. Many people swear by their Tamron 45 VC glass, I have seen some good reviews. Personally I saw no value in Tamron VC primes being a bit of a uninspiring, ordinary glass for my personal taste ( I am going to get flamed for this heresy pretty badly).
There is some nice Zeiss options but those are all manual focusing glass. kind of defeat the purpose for me.
you can source virtualy unused and still under warranty Sigma 50 Art these days at around A$650 on Gumtree in
Australia. I see them poping up quite regularly.
ozwineguy said:SecureGSM said:Cory, I have own(ed) more than 20 Sigma Art and Sport lenses in total, and helped many other photographers in getting their Sigma Art and Sport lenses AFMAed right, I can attest that there is not a single chance in the world that any given Sigma Art or Sport lens may be absolutely "spot on" out of the box on Canon 6D unless you shoot in live View mode exclusively, be prepared to invest some time in AFMA calibration. You do need the Sigma USB dock to achieve a solid result though.
Cory said:Are Sigma Art lenses often good-to-go on something like a 6D without any adjustment?
Thanks.
I have two issues that have held me back from the Sigma Arts, so I'm keen to hear your take on them.
1. I had a 35mm ART on my Canon 6D. I did find the occasional complete AF miss (i.e., not just a small miss, in that AFMA would fix this, and not a miss because the AF point accidentally fell on something other than the intended subject). Have you experienced much of this with the lenses that you have and, if so, have you experienced it more with the "older" ones (i.e., 50mm and 35mm)? That is, should I be less concerned about this with the more recent 85mm and 135mm?
2. I shoot RAW + JPEG (for a few reasons, but often because I want to get images out of the camera on the spot and send them to the person in the image, e.g., shots of my extended families when we get together). I know this annoys some people, but it's what works for me. When I changed from a 6D to a 5Ds, there was an incompatibility with the Sigma 35mm Art, in that the JPEGs showed "rings" in the images. Turned out that this was because I had certain corrections turned on, although when I sent the images to the Sigma reps here in Australia, they had no idea what the cause was. I'd prefer to leave this setting on for when I shoot with Canon glass, and I don't want to think about diving into menus to change settings like this each time I change lenses. Do you know if this has been resolved with a firmware update for the older Art lenses? Obviously this is a limitation of buying third party glass.
Essentially, I want to get a fast 50mm lens, and none of the Canon offerings seem worthwhile. I'm waiting just like everyone else for a new release! In the meantime, I'm considering the Sigma 50mm, but given my issues with the 35mm, I'm hesitant. Your thoughts would be appreciated - thanks in advance.
Upvote
0