Sigma 35 f/1.4 AFMA issues – USB Dock & Optimization pro not able to help?

bod

Canon Rumors Premium
Dec 5, 2013
55
11
5,066
I have been using the Sigma 35 mm f/1.4 Art Series lens over the last year. Sometimes it produces really sharp keepers and on other occasions every image is out of focus. Recently I have undertaken AFMA calibration on a variety of lenses using Focal in order to investigate this. I was not surprised to get these results for my Sigma 35 Art.

Distance to target AFMA required Focal result confidence
1 metre -3 Excellent
2 metre +4 Good
3 metre +2 Good
4 metre 0 Good


In contrast all but one of my Canon lenses when tested with my EOS 6D require a very consistent AFMA setting at different subject distances.

Having researched the Sigma USB dock, I thought that it allowed AFMA calibration of the lens at up to 4 different distances. I thought that this could solve the problem. BUT on trying my lens in the dock it appears that it is not possible for the user to select what these distances are ?!

In the case of my 35 mm lens this will make the dock calibration process of little benefit. If for example I use optimization pro to set AFMA at infinity and at 0.75 M then the calibration will be correct at these distances and off in between 1 and 4 metres. I am struggling to understand the logic of optimization pro since with a 35 mm lens if you are using it for photographing people then you are going to need to work within this distance range. Why have three of the four AFMA distances for this lens at less than 1 metre when any close up/macro type work is likely to use MF anyway ?

At present when shooting wide open I have AFMA = 0 and use the 35 mm exclusively around 1.5 metres distance to subject. At other distances then I have to change either the AFMA setting or use MF or stop down significantly. Hardly an ideal arrangement!

I would appreciate any help as regards:
1) Is there a way of adjusting the lens AFMA calibration distances in the Optimization Pro software?
2) Has anyone had a similarly performing lens and had any success with sending it back to Sigma for calibration – did this improve the AFMA consistency with distance ?
 

Attachments

  • Optimization Pro 35.png
    Optimization Pro 35.png
    38.1 KB · Views: 606
You should send it to Sigma for repair. That's a frequent complaint about Sigma lenses, inconsistent AF. Users have reported better performance after repair. It also depends a bit on the camera body being used, so be sure to tell them which body it is. I believe that it is not a AFMA issue, but a issue of something sticking in the AF unit that causes the AF issues.
 
Upvote 0
Thanks for the reply and advice.

I was aware of the potential problems with AF on this lens when I bought the lens so took out extended warranty in addition to the 3 years offered by Sigma. I did not have Focal when I bought the lens so lack any comparative measurements but my impression is that the lens AF performance has deteriorated over the time that I have had it. From other posts on the web I think that this is also a known aspect of the 35 Art's AF issues.

I will send it back for repair, retest it when it gets back and update this post with the results.
 
Upvote 0