slclick said:Sigma 50 1.4 815 grams official weight. My 24-105 Sigma is heavy as well but worth every gram.
mrsfotografie said:slclick said:Sigma 50 1.4 815 grams official weight. My 24-105 Sigma is heavy as well but worth every gram.
We're getting to the point that equipment size and weight is increasing so much that practicality is at stake. More bulk means less space remains in the bag for other lenses. It's good to limit the stuff you carry but can be good to have a little extra space for contingency lenses. This is why I keep the old 35 f/2 and 50 f/1.8 which sacrifice a little in image quality but are very compact which is great especially for travel. note that I always limit myself to the minimum I think I will need, and my lowepro minitrekker AW is the measure for the maximum volume I want to carry.
You must be talking about the new Nikon 58mm - LOLslclick said:Can you imagine? "Sorry the image isn't very good but the lens is so light!"
mackguyver said:You must be talking about the new Nikon 58mm - LOLslclick said:Can you imagine? "Sorry the image isn't very good but the lens is so light!"
Albi86 said:mackguyver said:You must be talking about the new Nikon 58mm - LOLslclick said:Can you imagine? "Sorry the image isn't very good but the lens is so light!"
That is one remarkable combination of sky-high price and unimpressive performance.
Albi86 said:mackguyver said:You must be talking about the new Nikon 58mm - LOLslclick said:Can you imagine? "Sorry the image isn't very good but the lens is so light!"
That is one remarkable combination of sky-high price and unimpressive performance.
Yes, just read that yesterday and that's why I made the comment. It sure makes me feel better about their review of the 50Lsdsr said:Albi86 said:mackguyver said:You must be talking about the new Nikon 58mm - LOLslclick said:Can you imagine? "Sorry the image isn't very good but the lens is so light!"
That is one remarkable combination of sky-high price and unimpressive performance.
Have you read the lenstip review of the Nikon? Ouch!
http://www.lenstip.com/2080-news-Nikon_Nikkor_AF-S_58_mm_f_1.4G_-_lens_review.html
sdsr said:Albi86 said:mackguyver said:You must be talking about the new Nikon 58mm - LOLslclick said:Can you imagine? "Sorry the image isn't very good but the lens is so light!"
That is one remarkable combination of sky-high price and unimpressive performance.
Have you read the lenstip review of the Nikon? Ouch!
http://www.lenstip.com/2080-news-Nikon_Nikkor_AF-S_58_mm_f_1.4G_-_lens_review.html
ahsanford said:
mrsfotografie said:ahsanford said:
Thanks for posting, the lens looks good but a little big too! Still, it's quite yummie
"A flower shaped hood is unnecessary on a prime lens" Who is he kidding.
Viggo said:How hard would it have been to show the distance scale while doing a few focusing searches? To give a slight idea of speed again the 50 L for example.
"It looks to be the same body inside" wow...
ahsanford said:
yorgasor said:ahsanford said:
"It's taped up so I can't take any pictures with it...", but they don't seem to have any issue with you popping the lens off and possibly attaching it to your body. Seem rather easy to do a quick lens swap and get some sample images that way.