fragilesi said:zlatko
Sorry my friend but you just don't get it do you? Lens innovation doesn't matter because you can get that Metabones adaptor to use decent lenses with the Sony . . .
And it really is a professional setup because when something goes wrong you can get support from Sony, Metabones and Canon which must of course be three times as good as just getting support from just one organisation ;D
<<<Rings Sony>>>
Customer: "Hi Sony my camera doesn't seem to focus properly even though I've got the right Metabones adaptor and a top notch Canon L-Series lens".
Sony: "No worries, that'll be a problem with the Metabones adaptor, give them a call".
<<<Rings Metabones>>>
Customer: "Hi Metabones . . . "
Metabones: "No worries, that'll be a problem with the Sony camera or maybe you could send the lens back to Canon for servicing.
<<<Rings Canon>>>
Customer: "Hi Canon . . ."
Canon: "Guys, we've got another one wanting to buy a refurb"
fragilesi said:<<<Rings Sony>>>
fragilesi said:<<<Rings Metabones>>>
dilbert said:neuroanatomist said:dilbert said:The 5Ds 50.6MP sensor is simply a full frame version of what's already available elsewhere in Canon's lineup (the 7D Mark II).
Oh, ok. The a7RII 42.4 MP sensor is simply a full frame version of what's already available elsewhere in Sony's lineup, except that it's had a substantial amount of resolution taken away, and they have much better sensor tech available but they're holding it back to milk their customers and force them to pay top dollar for old tech. Total innovation fail.
Yeah, I know. Sad isn't it? One day Canon will catch up to Son'y BSI and stacked sensor designs but not today. Don't you feel for Sony? All of this innovation in creating new sensor designs and nobody else has anything close to matching them. btw, would you mind pointing out exactly which other sensor the one in the A7rII is a full frame version of?
Would you feel better if Sony was more like Canon and kept using the 36MP sensor in their cameras for the next 3 years?
Solar Eagle said:xps said:But I am convinced, Canon is able to do "more".
Of course they can, but that's not how industry works. There was technology for flat panel TV's in the 70's, but none of that came to market until decades later. Every new generation of TV that comes out only comes out after the previous generation has been milked. 3D after 1080, but nobody took to 3D so now its curved panel. 4K is out, but not until after everybody bought 1080. The camera industry is no different. Canon can make a 150 megapixel FF sensor if they wanted to, but that's makes no sense.
psolberg said:If sony ships that firmware for lossless compression, it is over.
3kramd5 said:psolberg said:If sony ships that firmware for lossless compression, it is over.
In before Neuro: YAPODFC.
I kinda doubt lossless compression from Sony will cause a mass exodus from canon. After all, it's already available with a sony sensor from Nikon.
dilbert said:Solar Eagle said:xps said:But I am convinced, Canon is able to do "more".
Of course they can, but that's not how industry works. There was technology for flat panel TV's in the 70's, but none of that came to market until decades later. Every new generation of TV that comes out only comes out after the previous generation has been milked. 3D after 1080, but nobody took to 3D so now its curved panel. 4K is out, but not until after everybody bought 1080. The camera industry is no different. Canon can make a 150 megapixel FF sensor if they wanted to, but that's makes no sense.
You're wrong about TVs. The TV manufacturers saw such a large take up of new TV sales when 1080p screens became affordable that they have been looking for ways to maintain that level of sales. 3D was one attempt to do that. 4K is the next (next year nearly all flat panel TVs will be 4K - only the very cheap models will be 1080p - 4K is the new 3D.) Curved panels are another gimmick to try and drive replacement sales of TVs.