Upvote
0
The reviewers have likely already had it in their hands for months. So expect a TON of videos to hit YT in the coming days.
Here it is
This footage looks OK, but judging by, say, the fire footage at 0:25, where the color of the flames looks harsh and digital, it's obvious that the R5 is really not a filmmaking camera --- at least in 8K-mode, where the bitrate is stretched across that many pixels.
I look forward to comparisons of ARRI Alexa classic and R5 footage, which should demonstrate that smaller resolution can = big results
The review has more footage.
I think some of it is just bad grading of a camera that's not even running final firmware.
People don't yet know the right gamma settings, etc. Canon Log 3 is probably coming later on and it should improve things as well.
The Sigma fp had exactly the same problem, you can look at DSLR video shooter's initial impression video, it really depends on what settings are used in Davinci Resolve for the footage.
So. Go out and play with your new toy and register it later. First world problems...Received mine yesterday and have tried registering it on the Canon CPS website only to get an error message saying the Product name is invalid.
View attachment 191740