That award would go to the 18.1 MP aps-c sensor….Canon should get an award for out much they milked that sensor and processor combo.
Upvote
0
That award would go to the 18.1 MP aps-c sensor….Canon should get an award for out much they milked that sensor and processor combo.
Making commercial sense to do so though. Fastest way to get a mirrorless body into the marketplace and would have given a lot of profitability to enable R5/R6 R&D completed. Time for a new body though!Canon should get an award for out much they milked that sensor and processor combo.
Agreed. R6a would be a better price point cf R5a as well. R5a would compete with the dedicated/cooled sensor market.R6a would make much more sense. The resolution of the Ra is already borderline too high for astrophotography.
Would astrolandscapers want good Ha transmission though?Unless it's aimed at those shooting wide angle starsscapes with tracker.
Whereas all the birders want is a reused M6ii/90D sensor for an ASP-C R mountThat award would go to the 18.1 MP aps-c sensor….
XL-Clip-Filter for Canon R / RP Cameras - Clip-Filter
www.astronomik.com
...
Please note that Canons Astro-Version "Ra" of the R-body shows strong halos around brighter stars! (Even without any filter) We highly recommend NOT to get a Ra!
I think since then there were some clip filters that mitigate this problem but it shouldn't be there in the first place.
So in my opinion it will not be missed...
If I were interested in that type of photography I would probably use a modified 6D.What would you use instead?
And sensor's "banding" issueXL-Clip-Filter for Canon R / RP Cameras - Clip-Filter
www.astronomik.com
...
Please note that Canons Astro-Version "Ra" of the R-body shows strong halos around brighter stars! (Even without any filter) We highly recommend NOT to get a Ra!
I think since then there were some clip filters that mitigate this problem but it shouldn't be there in the first place.
So in my opinion it will not be missed...
I am not aware of any banding when shooting at high iso only when shooting at low iso and having to push the shadows a lot at the same time.And sensor's "banding" issue
If I were interested in that type of photography I would probably use a modified 6D.
Modified R5? Rather overkill. R6 yes if there was a mod service. R5 as is (unmodified) of course as I have one!Any reason you wouldn't use the R5? My to-do list this year includes getting into astrophotography, and I have a 7Dii & R5 already, hoping I could use one of those.
5D4 and R...where else has it been used?Canon should get an award for out much they milked that sensor and processor combo.