AJ said:Yes I too was expecting about 2.2
Axilrod said:DXOMark said it's 1.8, although that is pretty unusual
Oh, wow... that is quite unusual. If correct, bravo Sigma, bravo.
Upvote
0
AJ said:Yes I too was expecting about 2.2
Axilrod said:DXOMark said it's 1.8, although that is pretty unusual
Just don't look at their single finally DXOMark Score, but their measurement result should be valid.poias said:I thought we are not supposed to trust DxO considering they are in the pocket of everyone-not-canon.
Seriously, this is a SWEET lens, perfectly suited for 7D..
bradfordswood said:Pi said:Jon Gilchrist said:So does this mean I should sell my Sigma 35/1.4 and get the 18-35 1.8?
I have seen examples of horrific bokeh from the new Sigma zoom. The Sigma 35 is far from being a bokeh champion, either, but the zoom seems to be worse. I would wait to see more real world samples.
Any examples of this horrific bokeh you can point us to?
CarlMillerPhoto said:Seems like Sigma is in it to win it.
poias said:I thought we are not supposed to trust DxO considering they are in the pocket of everyone-not-canon.
Seriously, this is a SWEET lens, perfectly suited for 7D..
insanitybeard said:poias said:I thought we are not supposed to trust DxO considering they are in the pocket of everyone-not-canon.
Seriously, this is a SWEET lens, perfectly suited for 7D..
Not as good as it will be on a D7100 though......
please note <sarcasm> tags
Pi said:It is likely to be too sharp for the D7100 (no AA filter).
Axilrod said:bvukich said:The F-stop is 1.8, the T-stop will probably be in the 2-2.1 neighborhood, possibly 2.2 with that many elements.
DXOMark said it's 1.8, although that is pretty unusual