Please let it be a 135 f/1.2; 1.4; 1.8; 2.0. or 70-150 f/2.0
I'm waiting for one of the optics guys to reply and tell us that a 135/1.2 would weigh 20 lbs and cost $10K
Upvote
0
Please let it be a 135 f/1.2; 1.4; 1.8; 2.0. or 70-150 f/2.0
Exactly what I was thinking. There's no point in putting an RF mount on a video camera that has a Super 35 sensor. Getting the 8K abilities of the R5 into a video camera seems the only reason for this move. Still, so far the video performance of the RF lenses is not up to snuff -- I have the 28-70mm F2 and, while the images are gorgeous, it breathes on focus pulls and lengthens when zooming (neither is good for video). Canon seems to think there's no optical downside of adapting EF lenses to the RF cameras but I'm hoping the introduction of an RF mount video camera signals some very nice RF Cine lenses are coming.Could it be an RF mount Cine camera? Hmmm, Canon has a line of EF-mount Cine lenses to go with their EF-mount Cine cameras. making an RF-mount Cine camera before they have RF Cine lenses seems weird, unless they expect users to adapt EF glass.
I think it’s safe to expect an 8K Cine camera soon. When Apple showcased the Mac Pro, they used an 8K footage from an unreleased Canon Cine camera.
Not to mention that most (or all?) of those Canon CN-E lenses are manual focus.There is no difference at all in performance with or without an adapter for autofocus canon lenses (in some cases with an adapter on RF is actually faster than native EF) - so there definitely wont be a difference with manual focus cine lenses. I see no reason why adapting would be a problem for anyone and I am sure Canon will one day implement native RF lenses. So, I see no reason why this cant happen today.
I would shut up for the rest of my life.Fingers crossed for:
- XC-10/15 style body
- R5 internals
- RF mount instead of an attached lens
~$4500 and then YouTube can. shut. up. about. video.
I miss the days that I would get so excited for fast long glass.Please let it be a 135 f/1.2; 1.4; 1.8; 2.0. or 70-150 f/2.0
This is not happening.Or would it be the flagship crop camera to be announced?
Half of this forum, just as they read the post title...
...and then immediately after seeing this is not about an next-gen 7D RF mount crop body:
- A
R3 with 90 mpx and no video...please?
DLA - f/1.4R3 with 90 mpx and no video...please?
R3 with 90 mpx and no video...please?
I'm waiting for one of the optics guys to reply and tell us that a 135/1.2 would weigh 20 lbs and cost $10K
It's a remake. A true R5 without overheating 8k crap. $3300.
Half of this forum, just as they read the post title...
...and then immediately after seeing this is not about an next-gen 7D RF mount crop body:
- A