Thoughts on some classics

[droch]

Hi All

I'm looking to replace/add to my current telephoto lens an Old 70-300 II. I'm looking for something fast either a 200 f2.8 prime or the really old drain pipe 80-200 f2.8. I don't want to spend the money on the new 70-200 f2.8 or carry around a huge white lens.

I was wondering if anyone had any experience with the magic drain pipe or the 200 prime?

Thanks

Dan

 

[PCM-Madison]

I have the EF 200 F2.8 version 1. I have compared it directly to several of the better Canon zooms that cover 200mm including the 70-200mm F4L IS, 100-400 L IS, and the 70-200mm F2.8L IS v1 on my 60D. My copy of the prime lens has significantly better sharpness, contrast, and resolution than any of the zoom lenses (although all of these zooms are excellent so the difference is really only relevant for very large prints or for crops). Hope this helps.

 

[NWPhil]

I have the 80-200 2.8L.
It's sharp, fast enough for me, discreet in black - but heavy.
Also, does not take Canon's ef extenders, but will work with aftermarket one's
Another minus, is servicing and parts.
However, I will not part with mine ...same goes to the 15mm fisheye

Good copies of the 80-200 go close to $800.
At that price, you might as well consider a used 70-200 with no IS, if white is problem, a cheap solution are sleeves - permanent, a professional paint job, which may take lens resale value

 

[droch]

Thanks for the response guys... I think I'll try picking up a 200 prime on eBay.