• The Canon Rumors Forum has officially been shut down as of July 10, 2026.

    All data will be deleted on September 16, 2026.

    the ad free experience will return by July 17, 2026.

two 20ds or one 5D classic?

Oct 19, 2013
11
0
4,731
Hi,
I'm an enthusiast photographer. I do trucks, transport, landscapes and my mate's band. I currently shoot two 20d. I love these cameras and it will be a while before i change them. When I do decide to change, would a 5D classic be a nice upgrade? I won't upgrade for a while as I am focusing on updating my glass first. I can see advantages of FF but also of two bodies. What are your thoughts?
 
Hi Mr Bankes.
I cannot comment on which 5D to go for but what I will say is I just recently added a 20D to my range, I like the camera, it produces nice pictures, but the main reason I have it is it's disposable camera cost. I have been thinking of adding a 5D to my Christmas wish list due to their low cost to try out FF photography, and if I had your choice I would only sell one 20D body to put towards a 5D as I don't think they would raise that much to make not having a second body worthwhile.
I'm no pro but I think a second body is a no brainer especially at the sort of value you are talking about with the 20D.

Cheers Graham.
 
Upvote 0
I had a 20D and loved it and later bought a 5D for landscapes. Unfortunately I then found the 20D was not being used so I sold it.
Today I use a 1D Mk4 for most of my shots but I still often use my 5D and still like the images it produces. The only thing I don't like about it is the lack of live view (swore I would never say that!) which is handy for Macro.
The 5d is old technology and a bit slow by modern standards, but if image quality is your top priority, then at their current price I know of nothing that compares.
 
Upvote 0
Hi Mr Bankes

The 20d was my first digital slr, the 5d my second. It was a whole new world. It starts with looking through the viewfinder - and seeing much more (!) and ends with an image quality, that will blow you away. Plus more possibilities to work with large apertures. Go for it!
 
Upvote 0
mingulay said:
It was a whole new world. It starts with looking through the viewfinder - and seeing much more (!) and ends with an image quality, that will blow you away. Plus more possibilities to work with large apertures. Go for it!

+1

5D will give you significantly better low light images.

Just make sure you have EF glass ;)
 
Upvote 0
My first DSLR was a 20D that I used for close to 8 years. It was a great camera, but this summer I decided it was time to get a little more serious and went for a 5D. They're very similar in build and design, but has a much larger sensor. The photos I took with the 5D have been amazing. I kept the 20D for my son to use, but after working with the 5D for 5 months, the 20D almost felt like a toy. I highly recommend the upgrade, you won't regret it. My only complaint with the 5D was its low light performance. I didn't like going above ISO 400, but I'm sure it's still better than the 20D's low light performance.
 
Upvote 0
Ok, thats some interesting things to think about. I do shoot film about 30% of the time and I prefer it but I would have to agree about it being cheap. I do have EF glass and selling my EFS glass could also go towards the 5D. Cheers for your input.
 
Upvote 0