Well, well, well… could this be Canon’s lens roadmap for 2021? [CR2]

[Jim Corbett]

Omg, how am I gonna carry all that glass?!
My room is gonna look like the iron throne with all that in the background

 

[chasingrealness]

The 135 f/1.4 is interesting. All the others sound great but honestly that’s the one I need

 

[esglord]

I have zero interest in the 100-500mm L. I could see myself picking up a lighter 100-400mm non-L that will likely cost one third.

Hopefully, a better quality 50 f/1.8 doesn't close the door on my hopes of 50mm f/1.4L at some point.

 

[Aaron D]

I don't think it is important, but I do think it is expected. It is a unique selling point that they didn't have on the EF versions.

Could very well be. I'd really like to see a tripod foot on each, so the camera can be shifted instead of the lens. That would be killer--and easy to do.

 

[Fletchahh]

Was hoping to see a 200-600L or something along those lines but I guess we're SOL..

As was I, or a more affordable long DO prime. Ah well, maybe a third party will fill that gap at some point, at least this still looks like a great list of lenses regardless.

 

[mpeeps]

Will the 10-24 be a big bulbous beast like the 11-24?

 

[Iwasaki]

Basically rounds out there plans lineup to match what they have is the EF side.

this is why I switched from Nikon. I can get what I need when I need it.

 

[MacMen]

Canon RF 100-400mm f/5.6-7.1 IS USM

I think there is no need for a lens like this next to the RF 100-500 F4.5-7.1. Only when this will be nearly half the price of them.

 

[Philip V]

I was expecting at least one EF-M lens

 

[Juangrande]

The 10-24 and 100 Macro are mine

Ok but I call dibs on the 35 1.2 and the 135 1.4

 

[Wilfried Flitser]

And the 40-160 f/2,8 portrait lens in 2022?

 

[Ian K]

What would be valid reasons to upgrade for those who already have something similar or even better like EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM, instead of using an adaptor ?

There's already an RF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM available, take a look at that lens. It's a lot smaller than the EF that you have. Image quality is improved and it's lighter. It also has a 5 stop IS on it's side. It's also faster focusing.

 

[leadin2]

Wow! And I thought the last EF lens I would hold on to, is my 100L! Exciting news!

Also interested in 14-35mm. Hope the prices remain the same as EF.

Now, where is RF 24-70mm f4L IS?

 

[sanj]

I don't see the point of the "Canon RF 100-400mm f/5.6-7.1 IS USM". Given we already got a "Canon RF 100-500mm f4.5-7.1 L IS USM" which is faster at the wide end and faster at the tele end for the same focal length. The only thing I can think of is that it's smaller or lighter or significantly cheaper. If it was f/5.6 at 400mm then I could see some advantage to giving up the 100mm of reach.

The 11-24 replacement seems to have gained 1mm at wide end again, just like the 15-35mm and it's EF equivalent. I see that the f/4 version of the 15-35 gains yet another 1mm at the wide end, 14-35mm.

I would have loved to see the long primes come with a built in switchable 1.4x TC built in (like the 200-400 f/4L) that was such a great idea.

Size. Cost.

 

[EOSR FAN]

I was hoping for a super fast astrophotography prime or zoom thats better than 2.8.

• Canon RF 24mm f/1.8 IS STM Macro could be interesting though

Some amazing Lenses on offer though. It'll be interesting to see what sigma brings to the table. Id rather have canons own Lenses but if sigma can do some fast wide primes or pancake lenses id snap their hands off

 

[Ian K]

Was hoping to see a 200-600L or something along those lines but I guess we're SOL..

You forgot to add a 1.4x TC built into it. Now that would be a killer lens

 

[Stanly]

So if you get C70 the best native wide angle option is RF 10-24mm f/4L USM and at C70's Super35 crop it will have same FOV as RF 15-35 with a similar DOF if it being closed down to f/6 on an R5 ... =\

RF 35mm f/1.2L USM will be a great lens for full frame cameras!

 

[Ian K]

Size. Cost.

Which is what I said.

 

[janhalasa]

I was hoping for the rumored (or appearing in patents) 18-45 non-L lens.

 

[Hodag]

Does this signal the end of EF lenses for the DSLR?