JonAustin
Telecom / IT consultant and semi-pro photographer
Lee Jay said:17-40L.
I bought it in 2004 (before EF-s) as a normal zoom for my 10D. I thought I'd love it when I got my 5D, but time had intervened. To get a wide-angle on the 10D (again, before EF-s) I had purchased a Sigma 15mm fisheye. Well, the fish is on my 5D perhaps 100 times as much as the 17-40L. When I need a normal zoom, I use the 24-105 on the 5D and the crop camera (now a 20D) is used primarily with the 70-200. Once in a great while I'll use the 17-40L. It's still a great lens with great optics and great handling and AF. It's just that I like all my other options better.
This was me a couple of months ago. I bought my 17-40 in 2003 to replace the 24-85 on my 10D. I also now have a 20D, which doesn't get much use. So I sold the 17-40, along with a 70-200/2.8 IS and a 1.4x II to buy a 70-200/2.8 IS II. I really like the new 16-35/4 IS, but just don't know how much I'd use it.
My least used gear: 20D, 50/2.5 CM, 5D. The 5D is mostly my backup. I'd sell the 50 CM, but it's just so dang sharp!
Upvote
0