What makes a System (Canon,Nikon,Leica,etc.) most important?

Status
Not open for further replies.
I will try to post a few intellectual topics. Excuse me if I insult some of you (and your superior intelligence), as I got badly flamed for talking about the new D800. >:(

Anyway, I have the 5dII and D7k. I graduated up from the Canon 40d to the 5dII a few years back. God I loved that 40d. For me, I was familiar with the controls, feel, and AF/metering of the 40d so the transition was easy.

I got the D7000 thinking I would use it as a smaller, faster body--plus I could start using Nikon lenses on my 5d. Well, that hasn't happened yet, and I rarely shoot with the D7000. I will not take time to learn all the bells and whistles on the Nikon. It is a solid DSLR with excellent video, excellent AF, and excellent IQ. I will sell soon though. Its hard to go back to sub-FF after spending so much time with bigger, brighter viewfinder.

I like each system, though, for different reasons. I think Canon has better telephoto (and more choices) options, such as many F/4.0 choices. I think Canon produces better natural colors (leaves, grass, skin tones). I think Canon has intelligent engineers that make shooting very simple. The list goes on and on. Nikon seems to produce better wide-angle lenses. I like that Nikon has started updating all of their primes, and they are all seemingly fantastic. I like Nikon's AF abilities in their higher-end cameras. I think Nikon has better noise levels, which simply comes down to software and the processing engine.

We'll see how this next gen plays out. I was sold on the new D800, but I really want to stay with Canon as my primary option. They have a TON of news lenses due to come out, and I know they will create a great wide angle. If money was no object, I would choose the 1Dx. I think the low-light performance will be nothing short of astonishing. The IQ will be equally as impressive. Happy shooting....and shopping!!!
 
Canon has a bigger range of lenses, but all the newer Nikon G series lenses are seriously awesome. Easily comparible to canon L glass and in some cases better.

Nikon has the 14-24 which canon doesnt
but canon has the 16-35 L II which IMO is better than the out dated nikon equivalent

both 70-200 f2.8 are pretty much on a par for both

so many comparisons can be made, both systems have their good and bad points, 1 thing is for certain range of lenses for both companies is why they are market dominant over the sonys, pentaxs etc of the world
 
Upvote 0
most people suffer from stockholm syndrom with their camera company...which is pathetic.

I look at what they have for me. I couldn't care less for canon's telephoto line. I couldn't care less for most of their lens lineup either. But they have what I need. So does nikon too, but I just happen to land here. I'd switch if I think I would benefit. I'm loyal to no company because no company is loyal to me.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.