Hello everyone,
i am planing to obtain a 200mm lens and looking into various options. i would use the lens mostly for outdoors, portraits, sport, kids playing etc. i was looking into 200mm F2.8 L which is very similar to 135 f2 L. The only problem for me would be lack of IS with this focal length. Second choice would be one of 70-200mm, preferably f2.8 IS II. however my issue with this lens would be size/weight and not really being as "special" as my 135L. My ultimate choice would be 200mm F2 L. For the quality of shots i would forgive the size/weight factor, but price would be an issue and would need a bit more time to gather $$$. I already have 70-300 L and do not use it much since it does not produce the same "feel" as 135L
What is your experience with lenses mentioned above and how would you compare them?
The 70-200mm f2.8L IS II offers a good value, despite it isn't cheap, because its versatility. I will also render good bokeh for portrait use.
The 200L/2 IS is a beast and quality isn't matched by others but, it is a lot more expensive.
thankfully,