which 200mm lens to get

jdramirez said:
Dylan777 said:
I'm Asian, I have problem shooting with 1Dx + 200mm f2 IS II.

Nice shot as always... but I'm guessing your autocorrect decided to make an appearance. What does being Asian and shooting with the 1dx and 200 combo have to do with each other?

I was trying to say weight and handling on 1dx + 200mm f2 IS hand held. I'm asian 5'7", 165lbs ;D
 
Upvote 0
Dylan777 said:
jdramirez said:
Dylan777 said:
I'm Asian, I have problem shooting with 1Dx + 200mm f2 IS II.

Nice shot as always... but I'm guessing your autocorrect decided to make an appearance. What does being Asian and shooting with the 1dx and 200 combo have to do with each other?

I was trying to say weight and handling on 1dx + 200mm f2 IS hand held. I'm asian 5'7", 165lbs ;D

I can't remember the last time I was 165... might have been in junior high... which is also the last time I was 5'7"... The first figure grew much more than the 2nd... to my dismay and chagrin.
 
Upvote 0
Daniel Flather said:
The 200/2 is hand holdable for sure. I hiked through 3 km of deep snow with it slung over my shoulder.

I can agree a bit with that. I tried the 300 f2.8 IS I with the standard neck strap , once! Impossible for more than 6 minutes. But I carry the 200 either in a lens case from Lowepro or in a Black Rapid strap and I really don't find it heavy anymore. But if you're carrying a lot of other gear and then the 200 on top of that, you wish you'd brought a 70-200 f4 or the 135 L.

But see here's the tip, leave the other cr@p at home and you're good, I mean, who needs a tent and sleeping bag right?
 
Upvote 0
Patak said:
Hello everyone,

i am planing to obtain a 200mm lens and looking into various options. i would use the lens mostly for outdoors, portraits, sport, kids playing etc. i was looking into 200mm F2.8 L which is very similar to 135 f2 L. The only problem for me would be lack of IS with this focal length. Second choice would be one of 70-200mm, preferably f2.8 IS II. however my issue with this lens would be size/weight and not really being as "special" as my 135L. My ultimate choice would be 200mm F2 L. For the quality of shots i would forgive the size/weight factor, but price would be an issue and would need a bit more time to gather $$$. I already have 70-300 L and do not use it much since it does not produce the same "feel" as 135L

What is your experience with lenses mentioned above and how would you compare them?
The 70-200mm f2.8L IS II offers a good value, despite it isn't cheap, because its versatility. I will also render good bokeh for portrait use.
The 200L/2 IS is a beast and quality isn't matched by others but, it is a lot more expensive.

thankfully,
 
Upvote 0
jdramirez said:
Dylan777 said:
jdramirez said:
Dylan777 said:
I'm Asian, I have problem shooting with 1Dx + 200mm f2 IS II.

Nice shot as always... but I'm guessing your autocorrect decided to make an appearance. What does being Asian and shooting with the 1dx and 200 combo have to do with each other?

I was trying to say weight and handling on 1dx + 200mm f2 IS hand held. I'm asian 5'7", 165lbs ;D

I can't remember the last time I was 165... might have been in junior high... which is also the last time I was 5'7"... The first figure grew much more than the 2nd... to my dismay and chagrin.

I'm well aware of that siutation myself ;D

I was in that situation back few years back, then decided to be on selective eating path. Plus, taking a walk 30-40mins each day with 1Dx+400mm f2.8 IS II combo HELPs ALOT ;D ;D ;D
 
Upvote 0
Dylan777 said:
If budget is not an issue, 200mm f2 IS will blow you away. I used to shoot with 70-200mm f2.8 IS II a lot, until my 200mm f2 IS arrived. I'm Asian, I have problem shooting with 1Dx + 200mm f2 IS II. The background blur/bokeh @ f2 will melt the f2.8 ;)

I really... Really like this photo. I'm usually quite mum on photos I think are boring... and usually I'm only marginally enthusiastic about images I like.. But this... I really like this. Kudos.
 
Upvote 0
I have had the 200 2.8L for a few years now. I have had really good results with it, bokeh is good wide open and it is a very sharp lens. I like that it does not draw (sometimes unwanted) attention by the fact that it is not white. I was concerned about the fact that it did not have IS, however, after using it a few times, and working on technique, I have had relatively little issue with motion blur do to lens movement.
 
Upvote 0
I've had the 200/2.8L II for 6 or 7 years and love it. Its small and light making it a ideal travel lens and not being white is discreet. Takes a 1.4x TC well. I've used it for everything from indoor portraits, to wildlife and aircraft. Yes IS would be nice but I can work around it.

3431617125_a9897eae52_b.jpg


8592079142_43aefec4da_b.jpg


4518357225_d035cf7e1d_b.jpg
 
Upvote 0
jdramirez said:
Dylan777 said:
If budget is not an issue, 200mm f2 IS will blow you away. I used to shoot with 70-200mm f2.8 IS II a lot, until my 200mm f2 IS arrived. I'm Asian, I have problem shooting with 1Dx + 200mm f2 IS II. The background blur/bokeh @ f2 will melt the f2.8 ;)

I really... Really like this photo. I'm usually quite mum on photos I think are boring... and usually I'm only marginally enthusiastic about images I like.. But this... I really like this. Kudos.

Thanks JD. Just like your 85L II, shoot it wide open ;)

I'm currently shooting with Sony a7s + native 55mm. Love the size, weight and high ISO, however, I start missing my Canon 24-70 & 70-200. The home insurance Company and I have reached final value for the lost items from recent break-in. I'm few weeks away getting the check. Decision, decision and more decision.... ::)
 
Upvote 0
Just another suggestion, although I don't know that it would be a great solution for action/sports. Today I just got a beautiful old Nikon 200mm f/2 AI lens. I got it from keh.com for about $1400. I'm just breaking it in, but it's a much cheaper solution to get into the big glass field, and with an adapter it works great on Canon cameras. I've been using a Nikon 300mm f/2.8 AIS lens for the past year on my Canon 5D III and I've taken some wonderful photos. It's a little trickier to get action in focus, so you end up taking lots of photos just to make sure. I'll mostly be using it on my Nikon D3s that has modded with a Canon split prism screen to help with manual focus lenses and it does wonderful there. The 5D3 w/ Magic Lantern also does a fabulous job with MF lenses.
 
Upvote 0
Dylan777 said:
The home insurance Company and I have reached final value for the lost items from recent break-in. I'm few weeks away getting the check. Decision, decision and more decision.... ::)

That's fantastic news, Dylan. Glad to hear the insurance is going to come through to some level. Yep...decisions. I think mine would go like this:

1. Alarm System
2. Bolted Down Safe
3. Mmmm... lenses.

:P
 
Upvote 0
Famateur said:
Dylan777 said:
The home insurance Company and I have reached final value for the lost items from recent break-in. I'm few weeks away getting the check. Decision, decision and more decision.... ::)

That's fantastic news, Dylan. Glad to hear the insurance is going to come through to some level. Yep...decisions. I think mine would go like this:

1. Alarm System
2. Bolted Down Safe
3. Mmmm... lenses.

:P

I took care the first two. For me, it's more like half FF mirrorless & half DSLR or all DSLR ;)
 
Upvote 0