• The Canon Rumors Forum has officially been shut down as of July 10, 2026.

    All data will be deleted on September 16, 2026.

    the ad free experience will return by July 17, 2026.

Which L lens will be the first mark III?

Status
Not open for further replies.
dhofmann said:
I'm going to go with the 200mm f/2.8L II USM prime lens, unless it acquires image stabilization, in which case it would become the 200mm f/2.8L IS USM.

The reason is because it's soft and has very low contrast wide open. Being an L-series prime, it should have better image quality than the 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM, but it doesn't.

You must have a bad copy. I admit I've never used one but I can't recall anyone describing that lens as soft.

Anyway, I confidently predict there will never be a 200mm f/2.8 III, nor a 200mm f/2.8 IS.
 
Upvote 0
bdunbar79 said:
Not answering the question here, but I'd say we'll definitely see the 35 f/1.2L II lens before another Mark III. I could very well be wrong, but this is just my guess based upon all the current lenses there are. My perfect lens though would be a 65 or 70mm f/1.4L lens. :)
Oops i cross moginated this with what lens is next topic. The 35mm will def not be getting a III.lol
I do shoot 70mm a lot on the 24-70 so i would have to agree that it is a very nice focal length and at F1.4 it would be amazing!
 
Upvote 0
Sorry, I meant the 35 f/1.4L II lens would be out before any other of the lenses had a Mark III, not 1.2. It's hard to have a 1.2 Mark II when there isn't even a Mark I of those yet I suppose?

And yes, I agree. When I'm using my 24-105L lens, I find myself shooting at 65-70mm at least 80-90% of the time. Get me a 65mm f/1.4L 8)
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.