Which L lens will be the first mark III?

Status
Not open for further replies.
dhofmann said:
I'm going to go with the 200mm f/2.8L II USM prime lens, unless it acquires image stabilization, in which case it would become the 200mm f/2.8L IS USM.

The reason is because it's soft and has very low contrast wide open. Being an L-series prime, it should have better image quality than the 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM, but it doesn't.

You must have a bad copy. I admit I've never used one but I can't recall anyone describing that lens as soft.

Anyway, I confidently predict there will never be a 200mm f/2.8 III, nor a 200mm f/2.8 IS.
 
Upvote 0
bdunbar79 said:
Not answering the question here, but I'd say we'll definitely see the 35 f/1.2L II lens before another Mark III. I could very well be wrong, but this is just my guess based upon all the current lenses there are. My perfect lens though would be a 65 or 70mm f/1.4L lens. :)
Oops i cross moginated this with what lens is next topic. The 35mm will def not be getting a III.lol
I do shoot 70mm a lot on the 24-70 so i would have to agree that it is a very nice focal length and at F1.4 it would be amazing!
 
Upvote 0
Sorry, I meant the 35 f/1.4L II lens would be out before any other of the lenses had a Mark III, not 1.2. It's hard to have a 1.2 Mark II when there isn't even a Mark I of those yet I suppose?

And yes, I agree. When I'm using my 24-105L lens, I find myself shooting at 65-70mm at least 80-90% of the time. Get me a 65mm f/1.4L 8)
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.