jdramirez said:I changed my mind... get it. We all have specialty lenses, and this isn't that expensive comparatively. where else can you scratch the f1.0 itch?
Snodge said:It would be interesting to also compare the t-stop of this lens with the alternatives - I suspect being older, it's probably not going to let as much light in as the newer 50mm lenses, so the f/1.0 thing really is just to maximise the bokeh effects you can get from it. If you really like the bokeh effects, then go for it, otherwise I have a feeling it will probably be a bit disappointing...
I think that's a good idea, Surapon, and while the Otus is certainly a better lens, the 50L f/1.2 is a beautiful lens. There are a lot of haters of this out there, but it produces stunning portraits and is built as solid as any other L lens. It won't make the test chart pixel peepers happy and isn't going to compete with the 24-70 above f/4, but for portraits at f/1.2-2 it is an amazing portrait lens.surapon said:Good Wednesday Morning in Apex, North Carolina, USA. to all my dear Teachers, and my dear Friends.
Thank you Sir/ Madam to answers my questions---Ha, Ha, Ha---Make me more sick from GAS. Illness = Dame I do, and / Or Dame I do'nt.
Yes, As you know, I never sell my photographic equipment that I buy and collect since 1965.Yes, When I die, My Children might donate these equipment to charities.
BUT, I try to enjoy my old age now with the great Hobby = Photography.
Because of my low level of Machanic ( Do not fix any thing), I make decision that my next Lens will be Canon EF. 50 MM. F/ 1.2 L( $ 1084 US Dollars), That may be cure my GAS. Illness ( ??) for awhile = Better than old Canon EF 50 mm. F/ 1.0 L , which might be damage beyond to fix.
Have a great day, Sir/ Madam.
Surapon
+1 with mackguyver.mackguyver said:I think that's a good idea, Surapon, and while the Otus is certainly a better lens, the 50L f/1.2 is a beautiful lens. There are a lot of haters of this out there, but it produces stunning portraits and is built as solid as any other L lens. It won't make the test chart pixel peepers happy and isn't going to compete with the 24-70 above f/4, but for portraits at f/1.2-2 it is an amazing portrait lens.surapon said:Good Wednesday Morning in Apex, North Carolina, USA. to all my dear Teachers, and my dear Friends.
Thank you Sir/ Madam to answers my questions---Ha, Ha, Ha---Make me more sick from GAS. Illness = Dame I do, and / Or Dame I do'nt.
Yes, As you know, I never sell my photographic equipment that I buy and collect since 1965.Yes, When I die, My Children might donate these equipment to charities.
BUT, I try to enjoy my old age now with the great Hobby = Photography.
Because of my low level of Machanic ( Do not fix any thing), I make decision that my next Lens will be Canon EF. 50 MM. F/ 1.2 L( $ 1084 US Dollars), That may be cure my GAS. Illness ( ??) for awhile = Better than old Canon EF 50 mm. F/ 1.0 L , which might be damage beyond to fix.
Have a great day, Sir/ Madam.
Surapon
I sold my 50L f/1.2 and ended up buying another about 2 months later because I missed it. It's small & compact (unlike the 24-70 f/2.8 II), and focuses about 50x faster than the 85L f/1.2 II (at least it feels that way!). Plus, it's a nice focal length on FF bodies. It's my favorite family event lens / indoor no flash lens.Dylan777 said:+1 with mackguyver.
Holidays like this I wish I still have my 50L f1.2 or fast 35mm. 85L II is a bit too close, but more likely end up on my 1dx for the holidays![]()
surapon said:Good Wednesday Morning in Apex, North Carolina, USA. to all my dear Teachers, and my dear Friends.
Thank you Sir/ Madam to answers my questions---Ha, Ha, Ha---Make me more sick from GAS. Illness = Dame I do, and / Or Dame I do'nt.
Yes, As you know, I never sell my photographic equipment that I buy and collect since 1965.Yes, When I die, My Children might donate these equipment to charities.
BUT, I try to enjoy my old age now with the great Hobby = Photography.
Because of my low level of Machanic ( Do not fix any thing), I make decision that my next Lens will be Canon EF. 50 MM. F/ 1.2 L( $ 1084 US Dollars), That may be cure my GAS. Illness ( ??) for awhile = Better than old Canon EF 50 mm. F/ 1.0 L , which might be damage beyond to fix.
Have a great day, Sir/ Madam.
Surapon
mackguyver said:There are a lot of haters of this out there...
mackguyver said:I sold my 50L f/1.2 and ended up buying another about 2 months later because I missed it. It's small & compact (unlike the 24-70 f/2.8 II), and focuses about 50x faster than the 85L f/1.2 II (at least it feels that way!). Plus, it's a nice focal length on FF bodies. It's my favorite family event lens / indoor no flash lens.Dylan777 said:+1 with mackguyver.
Holidays like this I wish I still have my 50L f1.2 or fast 35mm. 85L II is a bit too close, but more likely end up on my 1dx for the holidays![]()
I have gone back to the Sto-fen for the past several months (45 degree angle bounce) and have been pretty happy with it.jdramirez said:Flash can and is distracting... But lately I've been shooting really wide open, f1.2, with bounced flash and I have to say... I REALLY LIKE IT. Could just be a phase... So we'll see.
I like this advice...especially the part about wine.YuengLinger said:Pride goeth before the fall.
Deep breath.
Go take photos. Drink wine. Consider current blessings.
Repeat.
Happy holidays!