Having shot with may fair share of L lenses, including my own lenses and others borrowed from CPS, I would have to say i'm quite enjoying my latest lens, the 100L... gives me lots of options I dont get with other lenses... the 135 is nice, but with no IS it has bit me in the butt too many times when my second shooters clamor for that lens. 70-200 is a sweet lens, but i dunno... from the F4 to 2.8's... they just has something that makes me wanting... cant quite pin point it. Haven't tried the 85L... but for what it is... at this point of time, i'd give that title to my 100L
My iPhone lens. If my house is burning, I'd have much more to worry about than a camera lens. Like making phone calls and making sure my kid and dog are ok. If I had time to grab anything, it would be my second backup HD, in case I hadn't backed up my offsite HD in a while.
Ok, I'll play. Assuming that all living creatures are safe and there is time left to grab anything then I'd take two guitars that are dear to me and difficult to replace. My 50 1.2 and 135 2.0 are still in production and would be replaced...
These posts are starting to make me wonder if I want a 135 F2 now lol. I have that focal length covered in zooms and my 100 macro is pretty impressive, but people seems to swear by that 135. It's either that lens or sell my Efs lenses and my 85 1.8 and get the 85 1.2. Damn you canon!!! In a fire, I'd still grab my 70-200 2.8 Mk II.
Your house is burning and you can only grab 2 lenses from your kit, the rest will burn. Which 2 do you HAVE to have? For me, I'd say my 70-200 2.8 Mk II and my 24-70 2.8 Mk II. They are my newest and cost a fortune, but I love portrait work with my 100 2.8 L macro. I guess I can order another when the insurance kicks in haha.
Both of these are known for having issues from copy to copy. All other lenses can be replaced, these are priceless. Or at least would take 2 weeks and 5 copies of each to get right.