• The Canon Rumors Forum has officially been shut down as of July 10, 2026.

    All data will be deleted on September 16, 2026.

    the ad free experience will return by July 17, 2026.

Zeiss 21 Distagon or Canon 16-35L For neighborhood photo assignment

Status
Not open for further replies.
Dec 9, 2012
143
0
6,046
Going to be taking some pics of a local landmarks in my neighborhood and would like to know what the best option would be for a weekend rental.

Photo's will be used in local publications about the neighborhood.
 
Depends on your definition of "local publication" too. If it's just going to get printed on a raggy newspaper, IQ won't matter so go with the flexibility of a zoom. If it's getting printed double-page in a nice glossy mag then you might be better off with the legendary-IQ of the Distagon (although whether the 16-35 is good enough for a magazine print is debatable, depends on your camera, lighting conditions, tripod, etc, it could still be more than adequate)
 
Upvote 0
dr croubie said:
Depends on your definition of "local publication" too. If it's just going to get printed on a raggy newspaper, IQ won't matter so go with the flexibility of a zoom. If it's getting printed double-page in a nice glossy mag then you might be better off with the legendary-IQ of the Distagon (although whether the 16-35 is good enough for a magazine print is debatable, depends on your camera, lighting conditions, tripod, etc, it could still be more than adequate)

I agree with this, but as I've never shot with a Zeiss before, I went with that option. It was also cheaper to rent than the canon.

I want to see if I could live with manual focus, so this rental achieves multiple ends. I'll also be assisting on a video shoot and the Zeiss may come in handy. 6D+Zeiss combo should be fantastic.
 
Upvote 0
While the Zeiss quality is unquestionable, the versatility of the Canon zooms make them indispensable in my opinion.
I'd take a manual lens of high quality for video anytime, but for photo, I'd go Canon zoom straight away.

Also, the new 16-35 2.8L II is improved a lot over the first version. Yay at sharp images!
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.