Cryptic Emails
Received some info about a new flash that will be launched in the winter.

This is what I think the email was saying.

Specs
ETTL-III
Guide Number: 205′ / 63m
18mm-250mm Metering
Weather Sealed
Faster Recycle Time
USB Port (??? not sure what that means)

No other specifics at this time.

History
“ETTL-II” was launched with the 1D Mark 2.

cr

56 Comments

  1. Agreed about the higher resistance, but they’re 3.6 (or 4.2-ish) V instead of the 1.2-1.5V of normal batteries. All added they can pump out more W. I don’t know much about the NiZn-edition, but i do know that pushing NiMH (or the higher-resistance, lower-amps alkalines) hard means far less capacity than stated, and a good chance of frying batteries quickly. Oh, and charging quickly is one, but i prefer my batteries to last more than just 5 flashes :(

    ps. You flipped the mWh and mAh ;)

  2. I’m buying! I won’t sell a workhorse for a new commer specially with canon and specially when one don’t really need the new features. :)

  3. Well I know I get about a hundred full pops with the Ni-Zn’s before I start to see a difference in performance. And Ni-Zn’s are rechargeable (less money spent over time), and greener and just as stable as lithiums. Lithiums may last a while, but so far that’s the only thing I see that they have going for them. I’ve also done a lot research on the different battery technologies, so I’m gonna stick to Ni-Zn’s, and keep recommending them to anyone who asks.

    P.S. The watt/amps are not switched. If you can find a converter, 2500 mWh is almost 4000 mAh.

Leave A Reply