Canon EOS Rumors

Canon will do a Livestream for the EOS R5 and EOS R6 official announcement [CR2]

This site contains affiliate links to products and services. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.

I have been told that Canon will be doing simultaneous live streams in the USA and Europe for the announcement of the Canon EOS R5 and Canon EOS R6 on July 9, 2020, if true, I suspect we’ll be seeing a teaser for the event very soon.

The same source claims that the RF teleconverters will work with any RF lens (I’m not sure about this claim). I’m also not sure if things will work differently with adapted EF lenses.

I have also been told that there will be more “cool” adapters and lens add-ons coming later this year. I wasn’t told any more than that.

mbike999

EOS M6 Mark II
Jan 18, 2018
54
109
Bay Area
The same source claims that the RF teleconverters will work with any RF lens. I’m not sure if things will work differently with adapted EF lenses.
I am not seeing how that would be possible given the protrusions on the teleconverters and the position of the rear element on many current RF lenses.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user

Fast351

EOS R6
Sep 12, 2014
47
62
Minnesota
www.fast351.com
It would be interesting to know if RF 1.4 + RF-EF + EF telephoto would work.

When I switch from my current crop sensor I will probably want a 1.4 or maybe 2.0 converter to go with my 100-400. I was planning on buying an EF converter, but if an RF converter would work the same with the only difference what end of the teleconverter the RF to EF conversion happens, that would make the RF teleconverter a much more appealing purchase since it would work with both RF and EF lenses.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user

CaMeRa QuEsT

EOS M5 11-22/4-5.6 22/2 50/1.8 STM+EF-EOSM 270EXII
Sep 12, 2016
43
42
No words yet on when the M5 MkII and the EF-M 53mm f/2.0 STM will be announced?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users

Ozarker

Love, joy, and peace to all of good will.
CR Pro
Jan 28, 2015
5,766
4,193
The Ozarks
I am not seeing how that would be possible given the protrusions on the teleconverters and the position of the rear element on many current RF lenses.
What you've already seen that were presented (not really) as the new teleconverters in photos(with almost zero details) might not be what really is. Canon says, "Psych!" on announcement day.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user

carina_r31

I'm New Here
May 15, 2020
10
13
So the event will propably take place in the late afternoon/evening here in Europe. Means after work for me :D Yay!
 

highdesertmesa

R5
CR Pro
Apr 17, 2017
361
492
www.instagram.com
I am not seeing how that would be possible given the protrusions on the teleconverters and the position of the rear element on many current RF lenses.

I still think we were seeing mockups that put an RF shell over the old EF TCs. Betting the RF TCs are flush with the ends.

There’s really no other way around it if it’s going to work with any of the current f/1.2 primes that have the rear elements so far back, unless maybe in firmware they limit the close focusing distances (Ex: RF 50 f/1.2 + RF 2x TC becomes RF 100 but with a minimum focusing distance of 2m).

If the TCs have a collapsible section holding the elements, Canon would need to use the IBIS mechanism to move the sensor rearward — not sure there’s enough room in the camera body to accommodate this. Or they could collapse in sections to keep it all flush on both ends.

Given how creative Canon is with lens design, anything is possible. But flat TCs would be the simplest explanation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user

Ozarker

Love, joy, and peace to all of good will.
CR Pro
Jan 28, 2015
5,766
4,193
The Ozarks
Something tells me there are people here that would happily "pay per view" this. ;)
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users

Ozarker

Love, joy, and peace to all of good will.
CR Pro
Jan 28, 2015
5,766
4,193
The Ozarks
I still think we were seeing mockups that put an RF shell over the old EF TCs. Betting the RF TCs are flush with the ends.

There’s really no other way around it if it’s going to work with any of the current f/1.2 primes that have the rear elements so far back, unless maybe in firmware they limit the close focusing distances (Ex: RF 50 f/1.2 + RF 2x TC becomes RF 100 but with a minimum focusing distance of 2m).

If the TCs have a collapsible section holding the elements, Canon would need to use the IBIS mechanism to move the sensor rearward — not sure there’s enough room in the camera body to accommodate this. Or they could collapse in sections to keep it all flush on both ends.

Given how creative Canon is with lens design, anything is possible. But flat TCs would be the simplest explanation.
Yeah, I wouldn't see the point of collapsible sections when the thing could be built flat to begin with. I think "collapsible" is people grabbing at straws that aren't there.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users

highdesertmesa

R5
CR Pro
Apr 17, 2017
361
492
www.instagram.com
Regarding the “cool” adapters coming, this has got to be 1.4x and 2x flip-switch TCs for EF big whites. Then all eventual RF big whites would have a removable rear segment to reveal an EF mount so they could be used on a DSLR (at the slower EF mount communication protocol) or accept the flip TCs that engage the extra RF connections.

RF Big Whites:
All intact — RF mount
Rear segment removed — becomes EF mount
Rear segment removed — accepts flip-TCs

This way there would additional functionally added to EF big whites, making those that use them want to switch to R bodies. And Canon could wait to make RF big whites until the next planned upgrade cycle for each lens since the urgency to deliver big white RFs would be removed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users

Starting out EOS R

EOS R5 - RF24-105mm F4L, RF70-200mm f2.8L
Feb 13, 2020
295
315
Excellent, both about the live stream and the potential for the TC's to be compatible with the RF glass!

I only hope the live stream has better streaming than the last one, it kept cutting out and freezing even with a full fibre connection
 

StoicalEtcher

EOS RP
CR Pro
Jan 3, 2018
417
358
Yorkshire
Something tells me there are people here that would happily "pay per view" this. ;)
Considering some of the pent-up frustration/excitement/call-it-what-you-will that has been in evidence here the last few months, combined with lock-down stir-crazy, I think you are absolutely right! Good call. :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user