Will the Fujifilm X-T6 and Canon EOS R7 Mark II face off in the 2026 APS-C Showdown?

"Regardless, the Fujifilm will certainly be the better-looking camera" in your opinion 😉 but personally I think all Fuji cameras are Fugly little boxes with nasty sharp angles and crappy ergonomics whereas Canon bodies are beautifully styled by the undisputed masters of ergonomics which always fit human hands and their curves are really sexy just as humans with curves are more appealing both visually and tactilely.

Not sure how many people buying an R7ii care about the lack of RF-S lenses either? I suspect most potential buyers would be using it with long telephoto lenses so it makes no difference that these are designed for full frame and most of them already own full frame bodies with which they can use wide angle and normal FF lenses.
The Fuji XT3 is the camera I most enjoyed using, Superb build quality, feels like a real camera I'm only using Canon as Fuji doesn't make FF cameras, I have the R6 mkii, probably the ugliest Plastic looking blob of a camera camera I've ever used but being practical the R6 mkii does the job. I'm looking forward to the supposedly op and coming retro canon based on the A1.
  • Wow
  • Haha
Reactions: 1 users
Upvote 0

The Canon EOS R7 Mark II is in the Wild

I´m really glad Canon has settled in a design philosophy concerning there milc. In 2021, the EOS R, R7 and R5/6 all had - what felt like - a complete different layout. Switching from the R5 to the R7 and vice versa was a pain concerning muscle memory and handling.

Taking the R6 ergonomics makes sense imo. The R5 shares some features with the R3/ R1 e.g. the top LCD, while R6/7/8 will probably share the wheel instead of a top LCD. It also gives us a slight clue about the pricing or at least in which area it will be. If R6iii/ R7ii share similar ergonomics and users beeing able to switch seamlessly, that could benefit Canons sales.
Upvote 0

The Canon EOS R5 Has Officially Been Discontinued

Like the 5D mk IV, the R5 will have a lasting legacy. It's a workhorse. I think so highly of it that I recently bought a second R5 body (used) as a backup body. I expect to have at least one R5 in service for many years to come.
Agreed. After I bought the R5 mk II, I figured I'd sell the R5 and use the R6 mk II was my second body. But for the most part, the R6II has been sitting on the shelf these past couple years. I usually only use it when I have a fairly unimportant shoot, or if i need a third angle for video work. I still take the R5 on almost every shoot.
(And it KILLED me to get rid of the 5D IV, but one day I was doing inventory and realized I'd sold most of my non-RF lenses. I still used it for video work til the very end.)
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Upvote 0

The Canon EOS R5 Has Officially Been Discontinued

This might be my first post. When I saw the discontinuation, it made me reflect on my camera journey

I started in high school with a photography class. We shot only black and white and developed in house in darkroom.

I owned several "point and shoot" cameras after high school all the way back from the film days to the switch to the digital ELPH style cameras. I even had one of those film "disc" cameras that took pics on a round insert. Remember those????

My first venture into owning a "real" camera was the Canon G5 back when it was released. I loved that camera and took it everywhere. I even used it for some portfolio work back in the days. This is LONG before I understood how to shoot and the settings of a camera. Side note: I still own this camera today

Somewhere around 2010, I got a Nikon D5000. This is the camera I learned manual shooting with. Moving that dial from "A" to "M" was a scary thing. That first ride without training wheels is always a challenge, but we get up after we fall...or take a bad shot. It was a big jump in image quality and focusing from the G5. It was also a very unforgiving camera for a beginner. I rarely got a bad shot from it. And that was because of the camera, not me 🤣

In November 2016, I purchased a Canon 80D with a 18-135 lens for $1199 from Camera Canada. Where I learned manual shooting with the Nikon, the Canon is where I mastered it. The output and colors were great on the 80D. I did find it less forgiving when the settings were not dialed in precisely. At first I found this frustrating, but it made me a better shooter. It forced me to study my art more. The 80D was also a bit slow in low light focusing, so I had to learn anticipating shoots. Adding this to my arsenal also made me a better shooter. I would study subjects and movement, not just shoot. I still use this camera as "B" cam on shoots.

I witnessed the industry moving towards mirrorless, but loved my DSLR and was not looking to make a switch. The initial Canon R was underwhelming and light years behind what Sony and others were doing. With an investment in Canon lenses;, I certainly was not going to invest in a new body. So I stayed still. I continued with the tool I had, ignoring industry noise about the advancements mirrorless brings

When the R5 dropped, I paid attention. Canon finally seemed interested in innovation and not just releasing a body to be able to say "me too". This was the first mirrorless from Canon I was interested in. Even so, I debated getting the 90D over the R5. One consideration was the price and the other was it took an entirely new lens system..... means buying new lenses!

April 18th 2022, I ordered the R5 with the 24-105 f4 and an EF to R adapter because I have several EF lenses.

Grand total = 5,037.00 😒OUCH!

My initial response when I unboxed it was that I thought a mirrorless would be smaller. I picked it up, attached the lens and took my first look in the EVF. WHOA. So clear, so sharp, so bright.......also so laggy until I changed the power save setting to off. Once I took my first shots, the difference between by 80D and the R5 was night and day. The eye lock focusing made missed shots almost impossible. And that focusing was fast. No hunting, even in low light. The ability to restore lost details in shadows seemed like magic, but I do only shoot RAW. Where the 80D was fun, but a chore to shoot with at times, the R5 made me fall in love with photography again.

I recently returned from trip to Thailand. I dreaded taking the weight on my R5 and lenses on another international trip. Being this was vacation and not work, I purchased an R50 with a Sigma 18-50mm F2.8. Not the smallest kit, but for picture quality, low light and reach, it works great. I only want one camera and one lens for this trip. The combo took great pics, but also made me realize the superior capabilities of my R5. Don't get me wrong, the R50 photos came out great, but it fell apart in times the R5 wouldn't break a sweat. I had to do SO MUCH cleaning up my low light photos it isn't even funny. Every photo had unbearable noise. The R5 would have handled this without issue. But we are taking an entry APS-C versus a flagship full frame. I better see a difference!!!

I say all of this to say, I see the R5 as a body in my kit for a long time. I am so happy with this highly capable camera. I didn't even look at the Mark II. I am waiting to see if the Mark III will incorporate open gate. If it does, I will get it because I want to record with Anamorphic lenses for music videos. Other than that, I thank Canon for making a true shooters camera!!

Today, I still stand as a student. Not the best photographer. Not the most sort out photographer and barely even known. But what my journey has done for me is create great memories for myself and others. And that is priceless!

Many of my 80D and D5000 photos still live here along side R5 images: Lab of Noyzes

Attachments

  • IMG_20260210_120345.jpg
    IMG_20260210_120345.jpg
    563.1 KB · Views: 11
  • IMG_20260210_100840.jpg
    IMG_20260210_100840.jpg
    479.5 KB · Views: 8
  • IMG_20260210_100940.jpg
    IMG_20260210_100940.jpg
    463.7 KB · Views: 9
  • IMG_20260210_105316.jpg
    IMG_20260210_105316.jpg
    1,017.4 KB · Views: 9
  • IMG_20260210_112349.jpg
    IMG_20260210_112349.jpg
    798.8 KB · Views: 10
  • IMG_20260210_120302.jpg
    IMG_20260210_120302.jpg
    567.8 KB · Views: 11
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Upvote 0

Canon Announces the Canon RF 14mm f/1.4L VCM

If you are stitching (eg 1/3rd overlap) then the corners won't be included bar the side/top edges of the final image. If you stitch sufficient panels then these areas can be cropped out as well. Hopefully any severe vignetting will not be as bad as expected post-stitched.
There isn't a solution for single panels unless you do a 2 or 3 vertical pano instead.

The other option is to stop down to f1.8 or f2 and track which should reduce the vignetting a lot.
You might ask 'what is the point of f1.4 then' which is a good question but performance doesn't always have to be when shooting completely wide open but it gives you options. I would love to try aurora video using it rather than timelapse but I am dreaming a little :)
Hi!

The overlap for panos helps a bit (I still need 50% of the overlap for the image), but I also try to minimize the overlap (around 25%) so that I can capture the aurora faster. That's always a compromise between aurora movement, exposure time, aperture, overlap and ISO. A bright aurora also requires a certain under-exposure to prevent the bright green patches from clipping and than it's getting tricky with 4EV vignette plus 1-2EV pushing for the general under-exposure.

And yipp, stopping down to f/2.0 should reduce the vignette to 3EV (based on a review) which is similar to the other 14mm lenses which I use. The Sigma A 14/1.8 also has a low coma at around f/2.2 (is more heavy, has no f/1.4 and is cheaper).

Yes, the VCM 14/1.4 isn't a bad lens and coma is looking low, even at f/1.4 ! My personal question is simply 'if it is good enough' to justify the steep price. So I will wait at the moment.

I'm not doing video, but this would definitely be an interesting lens for it as you need a fast aperture! Also think of the pulsating auroras which I see sometimes (61 deg N). They pulsate at around 0.5 Hz.
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Upvote 0

Canon Announces the Canon RF 14mm f/1.4L VCM

The RF 15-35mm F2.8 is an absolutely great lens!!! The iq is outstanding and the lens is sharp across all focal lengths. I agree, it is perfect for landscapes, city travels and @35mm F2.8 fairly good for environmental portraits or group shots. I used it for nearly two years and only sold it because the RF 14-35mm is significantly lighter and I have more lenses with a 77mm filter thread. Other than that, I never would have sold the lens. Still, I´d image Canon might one day release a lighter mkii version...
Even I would prefer a lighter lens, but, after having tried 2 versions of the 14-35, I decided to keep the 15-35. I found it to be better at the 35mm setting (my most used one). What I also like about the 15-35 is that it is built like a little tank, so, mechanically and optically a remarkable lens.
Upvote 0

Canon Announces the Canon RF 14mm f/1.4L VCM

I have a set of the Kolari magnetic NDs (3-, 6- and 10-stop) that I use with my R8 (had to install the metal mount plate in it) and the R1 (no plate needed). That's why I have not bothered cutting another piece out of the 10-stop gel filter (I did cut a piece from it for the rear slot of the Ef 11-24/4L).
Mine are the Kase clip in for the R5. I saw some repoports of the magnetics scratching, which made me think where are the shavings going? Have you seen any marking?
Upvote 0

Canon Announces the Canon RF 14mm f/1.4L VCM

Concerning the 14mm VCM lens: I'm a bit skeptical because of the heavy 'vignette' of 4 EV for astro as I would use that lens for panoramas. I already get sometimes 'colorful' corners after removing the vignette with my recent lenses and they have usually a vignette of max. 3 EV in the corners (and I'm using modern cameras with a large DR: R8 and R6)

The optical quality (coma!) is looking good, but I'm not sure if this 'stretching' might give problems (e.g. when stacking).

In total: The RF 14/1.4 is a nice lens, but there are alternatives - for astro - now (and each of these 14mm lenses has pros and cons).
If you are stitching (eg 1/3rd overlap) then the corners won't be included bar the side/top edges of the final image. If you stitch sufficient panels then these areas can be cropped out as well. Hopefully any severe vignetting will not be as bad as expected post-stitched.
There isn't a solution for single panels unless you do a 2 or 3 vertical pano instead.

The other option is to stop down to f1.8 or f2 and track which should reduce the vignetting a lot.
You might ask 'what is the point of f1.4 then' which is a good question but performance doesn't always have to be when shooting completely wide open but it gives you options. I would love to try aurora video using it rather than timelapse but I am dreaming a little :)
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Upvote 0

Canon RF 70-150mm f/2.8 IS STM Coming To Complete the Trilogy?

These days, we have SO many options and choices. We are truely bless with our gear options. After my EF 16-35 II L musings on the RF 14L thread, I was just thinking about how many UWA lenses are now available on the RF mount. Back in the EOS 5DII days..there were only a few options.
I was just looking at how good the little RF 16-28mm f2.8 STM lens is....it's a stunning little lens. I'm kind of guessing the RF 70-150 2.8 STM wil be cut from a similar cloth....small, light, sharp, sealed, not quite as long as this L brother...great price point, a great alternative!
Aw, man! 70-135mm f/2 😢
Upvote 0

Are New Features Coming to the EOS R5 Mark II & EOS R1 in February?

How did it go?
One of the notable changes is adding support for 8TB memory cards.

Not 8 gigabyte but 8 terabyte cards.

With a 8TB CFexpress Type B card it can do ≈170,000 RAW images and would need 21-42 batteries to fill it up.

Using a USB4/Thunderbolt 5 card reader's 3.3-5GB/s read speed it would take 27-41 minutes to download to a computer with USB4/Thunderbolt 5 ports + fast enough SSD.

I could imagine getting a 8TB card when it drops to $100.
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 2 users
Upvote 0

Filter

Forum statistics

Threads
37,419
Messages
972,751
Members
24,776
Latest member
LukyLuke83

Gallery statistics

Categories
1
Albums
29
Uploaded media
372
Embedded media
1
Comments
25
Disk usage
1 GB