• M
    Yes, that would be quite interesting for me as standard zoom on FF. This and the 100-400 (EF, ii) on the R7 (160 ... 640 equivalent...
  • Berowne
    The RF24-105/4 is the lens i use most since i have it. I did not expect this. The reason is meanwhile clear for me, it is small and...
  • Eloniel
    A 35-85mm f1.4 would be more useful Or even 35-85mm f2.0
  • benperrin
    I'll put my hand up as interested for this lens. I have the EF 2.8 II version and would love to not use the EF to RF converter. If the...
  • Z
    If they rely on digital correction, then I'm tapping out and sticking with the existing 28-70. Canon seem to be the only manufacturer...
  • Click
    I love the insect's metallic colours. :cool:
  • ashmadux
    Sounds pretty awesome. $6000, glass doesn't cover the image circle so the edges are going to be +4 to normalize and everyone will say...
  • snapshot
    I use my 28-70 f/2 a fair amount, but i am not sure i am ready to try to replace it. wonder what the delta cost would be? Adorama has...
  • P
    Oh, a 24-70 F2 would be fantastic. The 28-70 F2 is by far the most used lens on my R5 II (and R5 before that). Yes, it is on the heavy...
  • neuroanatomist
    Part of Canon’s commitment to the environment.
  • eero
    I can't wait for the RF 24-50mm f/4.5-6.3 mark ii, made from recycled plastic bags.
  • C
    Whats needed in a super zoom that is not available? There seem to be way bigger gaps on the RX100 style camera side.
  • C
    It can keep doing this job with much better image quality. Take it to a $300 price point and bring the optical design into the 21st...
  • C
    Make it a 35-85/2L and I'd seriously consider leaving Sony for Canon (again)
  • Skux
    If they do this then it'll instantly replace my 28-70 f/2 which just isn't wide enough sometimes
  • trexphotos
    Oh my "Yes Please" I have this Lens and absolutely detest the Sony body I had to get to use it. Love Sony glass, hate their bodies.
  • D
    Certainly! The f/2 version will be- far? - more expensive, the price difference alone would justify keeping the f/2,8 24-70 in production.
  • sanj
    Sounds good. I feel that there will be 2.8 version with the new tech to create a lighter, sharper 2.8 version (than the existing one).
  • Exploreshootshare
    You mean, where´s your 600/4+1.4&2.0 TC :)
  • K
    Craig got the smoke right, but forgot the mirrors ;-) But seriously, it would really need to have just stunning optical performance to...
  • neuroanatomist
    So many possibilities to be covered by 6-8 lenses per year, at most. Meanwhile, where's my 600/4 + 1.4x? ;)
  • @zajicekpavel
    Dead-Nettle Leaf Beetle - Chrysolina fastuosa
    • 922A0553.jpg
    • 922A0532.jpg
  • Rceres
    Another zoom? I’m sure it will be optically excellent, and I understand why so many photographers are excited about it. Personally, my...
  • Exploreshootshare
    Ooooooook, are these lines about the once rumored RF 24-45mm F1.4 L zoom lens? That would give me goose bumps although I´d prefer the F2...
  • Filter

    Forum statistics

    Threads
    37,473
    Messages
    975,025
    Members
    24,816
    Latest member
    GLBDD

    Gallery statistics

    Categories
    1
    Albums
    29
    Uploaded media
    372
    Embedded media
    1
    Comments
    25
    Disk usage
    1 GB