• D
    And yet, the PhotoTrend review speaks a fully different language, despite their strong Sony bias. To be clear, it's not my dreamlens...
  • Planterz
    On an APS-C body this will be pretty close (80-240mm) to the 70-200mm telephoto range commonly used in indoor sports and events. Paired...
  • Planterz
    Meanwhile... https://www.canonrumors.com/canon-eyes-a-canon-rf-50-150mm-f2-8/ Hey, lookie here! It's almost exactly the lens so many...
  • V
    I agree with last comment, IBIS on wide angles for video is not usable because of wobble. This is the biggest reason for me not to use...
  • slclickr8
    I was a fan of the Sigma 24-35 f/2. Maybe this would be up my alley to complement a 24-105L
  • neuroanatomist
    I wonder who comes across as clever in this scenario. Well, no, I don’t wonder.
  • M
    I thought it was fun to drag u guys through that, I knew there was no way a 24mp can outresolve 45mp, just getting all prepared for thr...
  • roby17269
    From my point of view there is no arguing... the evidence you provided does not support your claims. Simple as that. It's all good fun...
  • neuroanatomist
    Exactly. Some people have the belief that optical correction of geometric distortion is the best way, but it’s just one way. There are...
  • R
    Happy-sad. I appreciate the idea, but I'm afraid it's not for me. 2.8 is just not fast enough, I need to bring 50/1.8 as well anyway...
  • M
    D That part i sent was the best decided factor, I thought. I can't send the whole file as I don't want to blow all my data this close...
  • roby17269
    Does better in which way? There seems to be more CA in the R3 image and a smidge more detail in the R5 image. Why the difference in...
  • Surab
    Given that the 16-28 and 28-70 don't overlap, I would find it strange for them to add 20mm overlap between 50-70mm. I do understand...
  • Surab
    You are right that parts of the sensor are not exposed and thus "wasted", so that the image circle from further in has to be stretched...
  • 5
    50wyldeman replied to the thread RF 28-70mm f/2L USM.
    Took theses the other Evening on a trip we took to Japantown in SF, I have to say there is a strong argument for only needing the 28-70...
    • THBottleFIREY-1.jpg
    • THBottleFIREY-2.jpg
    • THBottleFIREY-3.jpg
  • L
    This lens is bad in ways that are hard to express. For me the revulsion is nausea inducing. It's just bad in too many ways.
  • M
    Thanks for explaining. Makes sense, I've had it wrong all along. Either way, I would say the r3 does better but every man to his own.
  • AlanF
    Yes. Resolution is the ability to separate two close lines or points, and your image is virtually devoid of such detail. Resolution and...
  • 5
    Its alllllll about those Kriptonians man... :)
  • M
    But there's not much else to compare to, sorry
  • M
    I see your point
  • Planterz
    A distant mountain is a poor choice. Too much atmosphere in the way to resolve fine detail, too much that can change between shots.
  • Filter

    Forum statistics

    Threads
    37,283
    Messages
    967,236
    Members
    24,637
    Latest member
    Alter8

    Gallery statistics

    Categories
    1
    Albums
    29
    Uploaded media
    353
    Embedded media
    1
    Comments
    25
    Disk usage
    982.4 MB