• @zajicekpavel
    Yes, that is perhaps one of the reasons for the constant delay. How to do it without endangering our flagships...
  • AlanF
    AlanF replied to the thread Why No EOS R7 Mark II This Year?.
    The major drawbacks for the R7 are AF and not having Pre-shooting. It's great for stills, but for action, BIF, DIF etc it's not in the...
  • AlanF
    AlanF replied to the thread Why No EOS R7 Mark II This Year?.
    That's no good for the target market of birders who want something they can hold with a telephoto attached.
  • @zajicekpavel
    So that it doesn't happen after those amazing rumors... I'll keep the same sensor, make the body smaller, add CF cards, improve reading...
  • R
    riker replied to the thread Why No EOS R7 Mark II This Year?.
    I just want that 32.5MP sensor in the tiniest possible compact body.
  • Vas Val
    Alpine swift and Jackdaw from South Portugal R7 + RF 100-500mm
    • _MG_0416-48.jpg
    • _MG_1606-90.jpg
  • Chig
    "Added American football to the list of supported sports for the Action Priority feature. When this feature is enabled, the detection of...
  • M
    I think, it's not that easy to produce a global shutter APS-C camera with 24 MPix at 1899 USD/EUR as a follow-up of the current R7 ...
  • @zajicekpavel
    Photos: https://www.canonrumors.com/forum/threads/sigma-17-40-mm-f-1-8-dc-art-canon-rf.45151/#post-1046371
  • D
    Context missing! :p
  • AlanF
    AlanF replied to the thread Why No EOS R7 Mark II This Year?.
    The R7 plus RF 100-400mm is a winning combination, and for perched birds is pretty close to the R5ii + RF 100-500mm. It's also great for...
  • Hovercraft
    Exactly, RF 100-400 is better than it should be, in reasonable light it can be as good as RF 100-500. Even with 1.4 extender. And R7...
  • S
    :oops:
  • S
    scyrene replied to the thread Why No EOS R7 Mark II This Year?.
    They gave us cheap supertelephoto RF lenses, a birder of limited means can do very well with current gear.
  • D
    All you have to do is buy the RF 100-400 zoom... Small, sharp, inexpensive! There's, in my opinion, absolutely no need for an f/8 400mm...
  • N
    A 400mm f/8 (or somewhat faster) IS STM could cost about half of the 100-500mm's price (600mm f/11 IS STM costs USD 830)
  • @zajicekpavel
    memory crisis and the competition has nothing better for wildlife... so Canon is in no hurry
  • D
    Both the 50mm and the 85mm f/1,2 are optically superb lenses. Neither I believe they could be dramatically "improved" to justify a...
  • @zajicekpavel
    • 922A3270.jpg
  • @zajicekpavel
    • 922A3262.jpg
  • Tom R5R7
    It appears that crop sensor bodies are the redheaded stepchild of multiple brands. Birders of limited means are not amused.
  • neuroanatomist
    No one should be surprised when Canon gives little love to the 7-series, their red-headed stepchild.
  • B
    Craig,, has there been any more input about the resolution of the R7-2 and/or R7V? One conjecture had it at 7680 pixels horizontal...
  • AlanF
    Common Terns are always spectacular in flight and fishing (R5ii + RF 200-800mm).
    • 6L8A3298-DxO_Common_Tern_diving_catching_fish.jpg
    • 6L8A3300-DxO_Common_Tern_diving_catching_fish.jpg
  • roby17269
    It seems to me that the 50 1.2 (I have one and love it) would fail both of your criteria... I am sure that there are other lenses that...
  • Filter

    Forum statistics

    Threads
    37,473
    Messages
    975,032
    Members
    24,816
    Latest member
    GLBDD

    Gallery statistics

    Categories
    1
    Albums
    29
    Uploaded media
    372
    Embedded media
    1
    Comments
    25
    Disk usage
    1 GB