actually the list is not complete , i have G1 Tamron 70-300 , it is working fine, (just that auto focus not tact fast per se) but it is a old lens

my G2 24-70mm F2.8 is working like a charm

Nice pictures, Aaron.

I just received my 400 mm lll and the 600mm lll The weight saving and the new balance is great. Both are coming with the new soft case.The hardcase is only available as an option.

Respinder said:

Ouch - this makes my decision more complicated - do I go with the 28-70 f2, or the image-stabilized 24-70..
I'm still leaning towards the 28-70, just due to the enhanced optics and bokeh that I'll get from this lens. At the same time, I know the lens will be much heavier, and I wonder if the IS becomes a necessary ingredient here?
For anyone who has the current 24-70 (without IS), how do you find it? Do you find that IS would make things better?

Click to expand...

I would tend think a lighter lens would be more in need of IS... based on my firearms experience. I have the current 24-70mm f/2.8L II and have not had a problem probably due to the shorter focal length. I won't be buying a 24-70 IS if it gets released. I'm happy with what I have. If I had an R body the non stabilized 28-70 would probably be my first lens purchase. However, I am more likely to get a 5D Mark V if one is released.

I can agree with Mt Spokane that cropping doesn't really work well with it.
For everything else in Lightroom I've found it very good and very usable. I would have had sharpness as a default switch (it is by default set to one of the controls but not named as such). I've been quite impressed by it.
Since launch they've extended it to use it with Photoshop / Elements and other software. This might be good marketing , extending its use but honestly I think its really for Lightroom only. Everything else is too complicated.
You can't throw away the mouse but Loupedeck makes alot of tasks quicker (like exporting) and cuts down on keyboard shortcuts.
I really like it. I'd give it a 9/10 - it exceeded my expectations.

Djack - would be nice to hear some first impressions.

Hi Dave.
Any progress, have any of the ideas helped?

Cheers, Graham.

Ladislav said:

To be fair, there should be "None" option to show that none of the released lenses is something we could use or want to buy which is exactly the case for me considering that RF will not be useful for me for very long time, big whites are not something I would even consider (especially shiny new ones) and those new 70-200 simply don't bring anything new to owners of excellent 2.8 IS Mk. II.

Click to expand...

But... that's not the point of the poll. It's just to see what people think was the best lens released this year. Not what out buying intentions are, or whether we're satisfied with their design choices or whatever.

I doubt I'll buy any of these lenses but I can pick my favourite nonetheless

Chaitanya said:

Considering there have a lot of good MF glass that was released this year, you should do a poll for manual focus lenses as well. There were quite a few good releases from Venus-Laowa , Irix and others.

Click to expand...

Can't you start a poll?

Chaitanya said:

True, these two lenses shown in patents will be bread and butter macros for Canon just like the EF 100mm f/2.8 duo have been. For photographing butterflies having that 180mm macro even if its f3.5 or f4 combined with EOS-R sized body(just add IBIS to make lens compact without IS) would be a good combo for butterflying. Pretty sure at this point we won't see replacement to Canon's current EF 180mm L lens.

Click to expand...

I have been using my P/S camera lately for “microscope mode” with auto focus stacking it works surprisingly well, but it is no substitute for the 100L. If the new version is even better than the old one, then it will be a fantastic lens.

So cute. Thanks for sharing.

Well done, Bennymiarta.

any thoughts on using RF 35mm F1.8 as a vlogging lens? too tight?
it is very light weight though ....

Larsskv said:

Quality light is lacking at this time of year, so I am afraid I wount be able to make a good comparison for quite some time...

Click to expand...

I am scared: me neither....

But I have made a travel report on it here, have fun and enjoy...

I think a 7DIII that even marginally increases FPS , focussing performance and high ISO performance would sell well.
EOS-R is hampered by not really being backward compatible to EOS.
It will require a number of EOS-R cameras to move existing users across.
APS-C cameras are Canon's highest volume sales in cameras so EF will still be in demand there.
Canon could make a great 7D III

Nice series. I especially like the first picture.

The camera has to be set up correctly for the eye focus to work.
I confess having made a user error.

Doing this has helped to be more like the 5D4 by quite a bit.

Hesbehindyou said:

Would be an obvious sideline - repair other peoples' stuff and rent them lenses while they're in for repair.

Given that they've already got the trained staff it'd be easy to start, as long as they limited the lenses they repaired to ones they stocked.

Click to expand...

That assumes there's both enough trained staff and enough downtime currently to take on extra work. ISTR RogerCicala mentioning that the lens testing department alone had a huge backlog already.

Utility patents can take many years to go through the system. The process can outlast the development cycle (hence items sold with the marking “patent pending”).

Generally I’d expect that nothing can be gleaned from a patent application, or lack thereof.

Paging harryfilm.

Don Haines said:

Merry Christmas everyone. I count my blessings as I am surrounded by loved ones and we are working our way through a mouse infestation

Click to expand...

Better than a Nikon or Sony infestation

Merry Christmas everyone. It is great to post with you all.

Thanks Guys, thats much more helpful than Canon's tech sheet that just says (without any lens F rating)
" AF Working Range EV -3 - 18 (at 23°C & ISO100)"

https://www.canon.co.uk/for_home/product_finder/cameras/digital_slr/eos_6d/specification.aspx

Yes, I remember that, but I was shooting Nikons at that time.

I have used the 100-400 II with and without the 1.4tc and as long as focus limiter is set it is ok
If not then it needs some time to get there or a little manual assistance.

Used the 135f2 in low light and had some issues locking focus, again set the focus limit to 1.6m and it behaved better

200F2 is fine, just needs the grip to help with handling

The EF600mm f/4L V1 is not practical for carrying over sustained distances and periods of time. Simply too heavy. I've owned V2 for three years, and with a monopod on your shoulder it is very doable. I've used the V2 with full frame to cover golf and tennis. And, it works v.v. well with the 2xTC III.