• The Canon Rumors Forum has officially been shut down as of July 10, 2026.

    All data will be deleted on September 16, 2026.

    the ad free experience will return by July 17, 2026.

Are These The Next Canon Cameras To Be Announced? [CR1]

fullstop said:
i very much doubt Yongnuo, Meike or Samyang got official licenses for IP from Canon. :-)
While I don't work for any of them, I'd be very surprised if they not all have gotten some "love letters" from Canon legal department/lawyers on various occasions. Not on Valentine's day, but following their product announcements. :-)

Thanks for clearing that up. Fantasy letters.
Upvote 0

Tamron 70-210mm f/4 VC USD (A034) Review | Dustin

TWI by Dustin Abbott said:
Durf said:
Another great review series! (as usual).

After using the Tamron 45 and 85mm f/1.8's for the last couple of months this 70-210mm lens looks somewhat like a step backwards in build quality and perhaps image quality too, although your photos look rather nice with it.

I was hoping you were to say more exciting things about this lens as I do want to get a 70-200mm f/4 lens to finish my kit out by the end of this year. I think I may take a closer look at the Canon 70-200mm f/4 IS zoom. (version ii).

You can take pretty photos with most lenses if you know what you're doing. I would recommend waiting to see what the 70-200 f/4L IS II has to offer, as it seems like Canon has really put their development efforts into it. I think the Tamron is a good choice if you have budget constraints, but I would be shocked if the new Canon wasn't the better lens.

I'm pretty sure the new Canon 70-200mm f/4 IS USM ii will be the better lens, but at a much higher cost.

If I do get the new Canon zoom I may end up sanding it down a bit and giving it a custom all black paint job! ;)
Upvote 0

Canon Officially Discontinues the EOS-1v Film Camera

RGF said:
I had this camera Very nice. May it rest in peace

I still have mine, (I was a Nikon film shooter) in the good old days, but since I switched to Canon with the first 5D to replace my crappy Nikon D200, I couldn't resit buying a 1V. I got it like new (4 rolls on the counter) for about 250€ and I won't let it rest in peace. :)

I use digital for work, but for my personal / hobby use, it's mainly about film. Most of my personal work is about 4x5 with 2 Linhof cameras, but I use also a Contax ST, a Leica R7, and an Olympus OM4Ti. They are all very fun to use, each with their own style.

I use the manual cameras for BW and color print film mostly, but my heart beats for chrome film. This is where the EOS 1V really shines, since it allows more keepers thanks to AF and more advanced light metering. Plus I use also my Leica / Contax / Olympus lenses with it. Considering the insane price of slide film + E6 processing, that's worth something.

Photography is not always about having the sharpest image, it's a lot about the fun to use the toys and the "feel" of the final image. In these areas film has still plenty to deliver.
Upvote 0

CPS loaner process -- enthusiasts welcome (...sort of)

I've been Gold CPS for three years. I am not a full-time pro, but I do sell images to magazines, do some stock and have >100 points. CPS has been good to me, and - in retrospect - the loaners they've afforded me have caused me to spend something on the order of 20x what my CPS fees were over that time. I have no qualms in saying that I've been a good investment for them.

I answered the membership questionnaire honestly, and no one ever suggested that because I was not full-time I didn't belong. I think the definition is a bit fudgy, which allows them room to be reasonable.

It would be a real shame to lose access to CPS. The repair treatment is fantastic - one prime reason I wouldn't move to Sony, where I've had rather the opposite experience. I had a 2 year old 5D mark IV die on me two weeks ago. Sent it in on Saturday and had it back with a replaced board on Wednesday. And they decided rather arbitrarily not to charge me. But the loaners are the real reason I'm a member. I have learned a great deal shooting most of Canon's range of glass over these years, and it's allowed me to really know what I want to purchase - and to have a heck of a time using some amazing glass.

I was thinking that Sigma and Tamron should do something similar. I think loaners would go a long way to convert those people who think their cameras will be polluted if they fasten on a third party lens. Tamron recently started a points system, but only the highest level allows for loaners.
Upvote 0

Sony is number one in the Chinese Full Frame market

Keith_Reeder said:
neuroanatomist said:
It sounds like you're so emotionally attached to your tools that you sleep with your Sony camera.
Defining yourself by your choice of camera really does suggest a personality which is fundamentally lacking in some pretty important ways.

There are far more important things to be emotionally invested in...

Wait--are you saying you don't sleep with yours?
Upvote 0

Loupedeck gets an upgrade.

Loupedeck+ New Features At A Glance:

Mechanical keys with a more precise and sturdy feel
Improved build quality
Two dedicated customisable dials and seventeen buttons
'Custom Mode' that allows full user control of all dials
Configuration software built from scratch for an even better, faster and more stable photo editing experience

https://www.ephotozine.com/article/loupedeck-photo-editing-console-gets-an-upgrade-32401

A North American photographer gets the VIP treatment at Sony

littleB said:
...As for beginning of the article, it very clearly reminds me of the book Gekaufte Journalisten by Udo Ulfkotte. I do not know its exact English translation, something like Sold Journalists. There is a story in this book how some Gulf country invited journalists, and paid all their expenses on the trip, every their wish was addressed. It is quite natural that those journalists wrote very positive feefback articles about that country, despite all the social problems of that autocratic country, and despite the fact that the head of the country was a tyrany.

Now I see that Rishi of DPReview went there. I would never call him unbiased, given that fact. It is quite natural for a human person, when given all the welcome treatment, to lose their critical point of view and become slightly biased, then the bias will gradually grow and then suddenly an independent journalist loses integrity completely and turns into what Ulfkotte calls a presstitute. This does not happen at once, its very slow and gradual.

This has long been a problem in American journalism when it comes to business, sports, film, cooking, etc.

Many times these journalists are actually fans who cover an industry where they would personally like to be the people or companies they are covering. Companies like Canon, Nikon, Sony, etc., know very well how to manipulate these journalists. Just read any of the Q&As that DPReview publishes after a trade show. The companies set the ground rules and the "journalists" happily comply and never come close to asking any really difficult questions or attempt to verify what they have been spoon fed.

This particular article is no worse or better than any other, but at least it discloses that the writers were all there on a junket paid for by Sony, so people can take that into account.
Upvote 0

Closing/opening aperture blades on lens without adapter

There's another way you can make this work, sort of, but it's totally insane.

Get a reversing ring with electronic passthrough for EF lenses (they have a cable connecting the two parts, connect to a real Canon camera, connect the other side to your Sony Camera (you may need to make a new mount for this.

Then use the canon camera to control aperture.

Not idea, by any means :)

alternatively, hack up a cable to do the same connecting the pins on the EF mount of your canon to the lens while it's in the Sony mount.
Upvote 0

A New EF 70-200mm is Coming in 2018 [CR3]

neuroanatomist said:
jhpeterson said:
But, I think what bothers me the most is there's still a good bit of falloff in mine, at almost all focal lengths even without a hood or filter. Sure, it's not as bad as the original version, which I sent back three times to get corrected, but it's noticeable just the same.
Another problem I've had is it gets loose, not all that often, but maybe every few months. I've had to tighten screws on the barrel just to make it sharp enough to use, even on one short trip running to a hardware store for a screwdriver.
I not sure my experience is typical or whether I have a bad copy.

The screws coming loose seems atypical. The vignetting is certainly noticeable, although it’s pretty easy to correct effectively. One thing to point out is that a standard filter will actually increase vignetting with the 70-200/2.8 II, so if you typically use a UV/protection filter, consider switching to a thinner one (e.g. B+W XS-Pro) or don’t use one. Personally, I think Canon cut the design a bit close on that lens – the other f/2.8 zooms (16-35, 24-70) went from 77mm to 82mm diameter filters with their MkII updates, but the 70-200/2.8 IS remained at 77mm.


jhpeterson said:
I hope somebody at Canon is listening.

Not here. Contact them directly, or at least try posting on their own forum.

I bought my EF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS II new in August 2010. The screws on the bayonet mount and the screws under the tripod collar flush with the lens barrel were constantly working their way out and I tightened them often.

In 2014 I sent it to CPS for a minor tilt issue (possibly related to a minor drop a few months earlier). I got it back with only a little improvement in the optical alignment, but the screws suddenly miraculously stopped working themselves out.

I worked around the minor tilt issue until another drop definitely caused a major tilt issue in 2017. This time I sent a CD with test shots demonstrating the problem and a letter describing it in much more detail. I got the lens back in perfect optical alignment. The screws are *tight* this time.

My guess is that the earliest production runs either did not torque the screws tightly enough or didn't use any type of loctite type compound. Apparently by 2014 they had increased the torque or started using 'loctite'.
Upvote 0

Preorder the Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L IS II and Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS III

slclick said:
I think the f/4 II could blow away the Tammy G2 2.8.....someone tell me I'm wrong

Depends on what you mean by blow away. If you are referring to sharpness, AF accuracy/consistency, build quality, IS effectiveness, etc. then you may very well be right.

But if you are referring to how nice the f/2.8 output looks... ::)

- A
Upvote 0

What's Next From Canon?

RGF said:
Like to see canon's update to the 5D M4 following Nikon's D850 announcement. The D850 is a stellar camera, it raises the bar.

Curious to see if Canon keeps the 'all-arounder' and 'high res' 5D lines separate, or if they follow suit with Nikon and just make the 5DS2 the top of line supercamera that really does it all.

My money's on the former, but folks may still interpret the detail camera as being top of the line if it slides in at (say) 60 MP x 6 fps (70 x 5, 50 x 7, etc.). See my ramblings on 7 fps with the 5D4 really muddying the waters between the 5D4 and 5DS2.

- A
Upvote 0

Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L IS II Information Ahead of Tonight's Announcement

The more I read and learn about this lens, the more I want it!

I've never owned a 70-200mm lens and currently use the consumer grade EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS II USM Lens, which seems alright and I've got some pretty good images with it.

I like the extra reach with the 300mm end but I'm thinking the added sharpness with this new 70-200mm, all I really would need to do is just crop more often if needed.

I honestly don't see buying the approx. 12yr old version of this lens when the new one is only 200.00 more.

I'm wondering if it's really worth upgrading to this new lens??????

Attachments

  • 1528380022000_IMG_1002369.jpg
    1528380022000_IMG_1002369.jpg
    42.7 KB · Views: 189
Upvote 0

Can anyone tell me what camera Natalie Amrossi is holding in her picture?

Hi wsmith.
No worries on the commotion, not the worst topic on here for sure, in fact it made me take a second look at my cameras! Also I did a quick google search and couldn’t find a single picture of the bottom of a Canon camera! I have to agree that it does look a little narrower than some bodies.

Cheers, Graham.

wsmith96 said:
Quick comparison. See how the bottom of the camera isn’t straight on the 60d (right) and 80d (top)? There is a slight curve out to accommodate the mirror box. He 5D, left, is straight across. Sorry for the commotion on this.
Upvote 0

Filter

Forum statistics

Threads
37,480
Messages
975,426
Members
24,816
Latest member
GLBDD

Gallery statistics

Categories
1
Albums
29
Uploaded media
372
Embedded media
1
Comments
25
Disk usage
1 GB