Posts

greger · Jul 1, 2018

Those are really nice pictures! I am jealous! Well done!

Mt Spokane Photography · Jun 30, 2018

canonnews said:
Mt Spokane Photography said:

This is a improvement to two IBIS patents issued several years ago with the main feature of miniaturizing the gyros. Its otherwise the same patent from 2006 and 2008 which will be soon expiring. Its common for patent owners to make changes or add features in order to expand patent life or take advantage of new technology to make them more practical to manufacture.
It is a In Body Camera Stabilization, sometimes referred to as IBIS, the gyros are mounted on the rear of the sensor.

Click to expand...

it's not in camera stabilization.

Canon puts the velocity sensors as close to the sensor as possible as that is the axis movement. this has nothing to do with sensor stabilization.

Right! I did not intend to imply that its a stabilized sensor, I see that it can be read that way, I will fix it when I have more time.

It is not like Sony or others where the sensor moves to stabilize the image. I'm not sure if this is a firmware based IS that works on the image, or sends a signal to the lens.

niels123 · Jun 30, 2018

Attached is a picture of the Yongnuo Canon EF to Sony E Smart Adapter. Does anyone knows if it is possible to glue a filter adapter ring onto the part marked in red in the picture? I'd like to get this adapter if it is indeed possible so I can attach UV/ND/polarizer filters behind the EF lens

Ph0t0 · Jun 30, 2018

SLRClub has posted a review of the new Canon EF 70-200mm F4L IS II USM

http://www.slrclub.com/bbs/vx2.php?id=slr_review&no=611

Maiaibing · Jun 29, 2018

dtaylor said:
applecider said:

Given premise that the more MP the worse the high iso performance...

Click to expand...

This is a false premise except, possibly, for very long astro photos.

5Ds isn't good at high ISO became a meme in early reviews thanks to pixel peeping and Canon capping the max ISO at 12,800. In reality it's as good as any other FF when viewed at the same physical size, i.e. the same print size. A few sites figured this out and reported accurately on the 5Ds high ISO capabilities. One big one being Imaging Resource in their print quality section.

Even today, 3 years later, it's maybe 2/3rds to 1 stop behind the newest FF bodies at high ISO. (5D4, D850, A7 third generation.)

Correct, and its even only like that until iso 400 - after that 5DSR is on par with the 5DIV.

KeithBreazeal · Jun 29, 2018

Funny!
On a side note, Tamron introduced a f2.8 28-75mm for Sony ff mirrorless mounts.
Even if Canon went with a E-AFU mount, somebody will fill the hole.
http://tamron-usa.com/product/lenses/a036.html

Mt Spokane Photography · Jun 29, 2018

neuroanatomist said:
BeenThere said:

Could the dual pixel “focus adjust” be used (theoretically) to algorithm correct a lens to a flatter focus field in post processing? Obviously it would require a lot of measurement work and software development.
Just wondering out loud.

Click to expand...

I believe it could, yes. That would be a great application for dual pixel RAW, to correct the minor but predictable focus variance resulting from mild field curvature.

That got me thinking about stacking software that uses the two images from the dual pixels. They can be recovered using DPR Split, and stacking software should select the portions of the two or three if you include the combined image.
https://www.fastrawviewer.com/DPRSplit

fullstop · Jun 29, 2018

R1-7D said:
When I started reading this thread my iPhone had 17% charge left; now it only has 14%. What a waste.

hehe. On a Canon "4-stage" bar indicator you would not even know this. ;D

-1 · Jun 29, 2018

fonzi337 said:
Thank you for all the responses, they've been very helpful. For her I think she will take a combination of indoor, outdoor and fast/sports shots, so I suppose an all-round good DSLR would be important. From the comments here and from what I've read, it sounds like the 70D may be more than enough camera to start and may be something she can grow into with time. As some of you mentioned, worst case the camera can be sold at a later time.

Thanks again for all the help!

True... ;-|

DSP121 · Jun 29, 2018

Wow...!
Beautiful pictures

applecider · Jun 28, 2018

Thanks for the suggestion. I’m a bit of a hoarder so sometimes I need a push to get things out the door one way or the other.

Still have some FD lenses and three film cameras that I’ve not touched in ten years other than to push them aside to get to other stuff. Also leave them out as decoys when I leave house for any length of time.

Canon Rumors · Jun 28, 2018

HTML:

<p>Adorama has stock of the brand new Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L IS II.</p>
<p class="tabSectionHeader"><strong>Key Features</strong></p>
<div class="widget-filter">
<ul class="original">
<li>Optical Image Stabilization at up to 5 Stops of Shake Correction</li>
<li>IS Mode 3 Effective When Tracking Irregularly Moving Subjects and Assists When Panning</li>
<li>Highly Resistant to Dust and Water, and Improved Durability Even in Harsh Conditions.</li>
<li>Three Image Stabilization Modes for Outstanding Results.</li>
<li>Minimum Focusing Distance Shortened from 3.9 ft. to Approx. 3.3 ft. (1.2m to 1m).</li>
<li>Optimized Lens Placement and Coatings Minimize Ghosting and Flare.</li>
<li>Circular Aperture (9 blades) for Beautiful, Soft Backgrounds.</li>
</ul>
</div>
<p><strong><a href="https://www.adorama.com/ca7020042.html?kbid=64393">Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L IS II $1299 at Adorama</a></strong></p>
<span id="pty_trigger"></span>

fullstop · Jun 28, 2018

yes, but interest and demand for soft focus lenses seems a bit ... soft.

Durf · Jun 27, 2018

My 80D's grip is quite solid for sure, this one surely looked like is was busted somehow, probably was dropped and hit the floor hard right on the grip....

benique · Jun 27, 2018

The sharpest lens I have ever used is the Nikkor 50mm F2. Many people say the same.

I often get moiré below the eyes or the hair when the focus is spot on. I attached an example 100% crop. The photo was taking with a 650D and opened in Photoshop with standard settings. I usually take photos at F4-5.6 but I think it will look about the same at F8.

Steve Dmark2 · Jun 27, 2018

Hello,
I can highly recommend the Sigma 17-50 EX 2.8 lens.
This is my always on lens, it can be used for almost everything:

Family shootings, weddings, landscape, sports...
(In case of sports I shot my brothers team at handball, in a poorly lighted gym.)

For 300€, it is a lot of lens!
The only thing which is a pain is video recording, at least if you record audio close to the lens because of the quite noisy autofocus.
For this I bought the 100€ 18-55 STM lens. However it is not as sharp and versitale as the Sigma.

Cheers,

Stefan

Jim Saunders · Jun 27, 2018

Cheap umbrella, cheap stand, good old fashioned sync cable. Once you know you need wireless the Yongnuo YN600EX-RT lights are good enough and cheap enough to mess with for a while until you figure out the next step after that.

Also have a look at strobist.blogspot.com

Jim

zim · Jun 26, 2018

It's been renamed iblock just speak the command clearly to your iPC

xps · Jun 26, 2018

Sony sites rumor to see an Sony A6700 to use 31.49MP IMX342LQA Global Shutter APS-C Sensor.

That would be fine to see it in an MLS body from Canon too. Electronic curtain. 10fps without distortion of objects.....
Silent birding... 31MP crop... mmmmhhhh for small birds

Chaitanya · Jun 26, 2018

chrysoberyl said:
Chaitanya said:

chrysoberyl said:

LensTip posted sample images, so we may have a full review soon.

Click to expand...

Thanks for the info, those samples certainly seem quite decent.

Click to expand...

This lens is sharp, probably as sharp as my Milvus 100, but it does not have the microcontrast that the Milvus has. But it has AF and I have not yet decided how good that is for macro; more evaluation is needed. I remain surprised that I would even consider AF for macro. I like this lens a portrait lens using the AF.

The disappointment so far is the MF; a firm twist throws it far out of focus and a slight turn usually overshoots. I miss the consistency of a direct connection, but I will continue to practice. But I doubt that I will ever purchase another focus by wire lens.

So typical focus by wire quirk exists even with this lens.

bokehmon22 · Jun 25, 2018

rrcphoto said:
bokehmon22 said:

rrcphoto said:

bokehmon22 said:

3kramd5 said:

Mikehit said:

unfocused said:

Mikehit said:

...Canon is unlikely to hit this level on the first iteration so they will probably be pragmatic and be happy initially with something to make the statement "we can do it too"...

Click to expand...

I've seen this reasoning a lot on this forum and I don't understand it. Why would Canon not want to hit it out of the park on its first attempt? And, why couldn't they?

They certainly have the resource available. And they've no doubt been researching this for years. I'm not suggesting that their first full frame mirrorless with be the perfect body for everyone. There are some baked-in decisions that will be guaranteed to disappoint no matter what they do (lens mount for example). But, I find it very unlikely they will unveil a "beta" version and in effect say, "we'll do better next time."

Click to expand...

The reason I am a bit sceptical is that there is a difference between designing a product and it working out as you intended in the real world.
Added to this, Canon is very cautious about releasing new technology - it seems to me that if there is any doubt they prefer to hold back a bit until something works with a high degree of confidence. Their main marketing drive is making cameras that professionals use and as a soldier says, a rifle that works intermittently is worse than one that does not work at all and I think that thinking has got into Canon's DNA.
Yes, the M series started off a bit of a lemon but that was aimed squarely at the lower end of the market, but I get the idea that with their first FF mirrorless they want to aim more upmarket and that means it must work.

Click to expand...

I get that, but canon does not need any new to them technology. They have arguably the best on sensor auto ficus system; they know how to make an EVF. What else is there really? Hell if they want to do something special, they know how to make a global shutter too.

I expect them to do the smart thing, which is to go up to the widest market they can capture. That’s not the high end, and it won’t be a spec sheet warrior, but there is no reason to assume it won’t be well thought out and put together.

Click to expand...

Canon has shown they are closer to building a FF mirrorless camera than a lot of people give them credit for and more closer to FF mirrorless than Nikon.

They have technology based on previous APS-C mirrorless tech:
- DPAF with full touch screen menu and focusing
- EVF from M5
- eyeAF from M50
- Ergonomic, menu & build quality from DSLR
- global shutter

Canon can really come out with a really compelling FF mirrorless this Sept if they are aggressive. Pent up demand with enough features at compelling prices will drive a lot of sales even if they decided to go with a new mount (backward compatible to EF lens via adapter close to 100% native).

- 26-30 mp sensor that's an improvement over 2 yo 5D IV
- improved EVF from M5
- improved eyeAF from M50
- ergonomic, menu, build quality, color science similar to 6D
- dual SD
- fully touch screen.

If they can add global shutter, IBIS, or comprehensive video features, it will definitely a success.

Click to expand...

the M50 is killing it in Japan, do they even need to do that much?

The 5D Mark IV sensor is very competitive as it stands, they don't even really have to improve that much on it. just make it faster, and less power intensive.

Click to expand...

Canon APS-C Mirrorless is very successful in Japan except world-wide. I think Canon would like a debut their first FF mirrorless not like a first generation product but a more mature and well-thought camera.

I don't think what I'm asking is too much. I don't expect global shutter sensor or similiar ISO/DR as Sony sensor.
They already a great camera with Canon 5D IV and existing APS-C Mirrorless and that sensor is more than most photographer needs for a 2 years old sensor. I'm sure they can refine the sensor even more.

Click to expand...

your phrasing was confusing then because it sounded like you thought they *needed* to have global shutter, IBIS, or comprehensive video features, to be a success.

I took it out for avoid confusion. It doesn't need global shutter or IBIS to be successful. A decent video feature may be needed to be competitive for hybrid shooter and if they are demanding $3000+ up MSRP. No way Canon can only deliver Canon 5D IV video features in 2018.

chrysoberyl · Jun 25, 2018

I like this pickle jar; it's so big I think it has it's own gravity. It will be hard to misplace.

But seriously, this thing is almost as sharp wide open as my Milvus 100 wide open. I hope I get some clear air soon for astro. And focusing is a delight; a well-damped focus ring and a reasonable amount of throw.

fullstop · Jun 25, 2018

YuengLinger said:
They seem to be a very stable company.

don't know for the company, have not seen their financials. but it certainly applies to their products. ;-)

anything i purchased from them was really right for the intended task, but also "really expensive". especially once import duties (drüending on item! up to about 10%, in the future maybe more ... oO) and incurred import sales tax/VAT (20%) on "cost of goods plus shipping" (!) were added. i've given up on purchasing camera-specific plates after having to give them away as a freebie when i sold "outdated" cameras in the past. their tripod prices are so sky high that i am not even willing to consider it. in the same line as i was never inclined to buy expensive 100% oxygen-free copper monster cables for a hifi system. nice, but over-engineered for my needs.

Frodo · Jun 25, 2018

BillB said:
In response to the OP's question 3, the 16-35 F2.8 III and the 24-70 F2.8 II are both very good lenses, but they are both heavy and there is a lot of overlap. So, one question might be how important is it to close the gap between 35 and 70, figuring in the possibility of zooming with your feet, stitching and cropping.

Or the overlap between 14 and 24?
I remain happy with my Samyang 14/2.8, especially because of the lack of coma and its pretty sharp wide open. Photoshop corrections remove distortion and vignetting (with a little extra noise).
Looking at your shooting stats and your current kit, I'd take the 14/2.8 and 24-105/4 hiking. I do. This covers most things for modest weight.
This option is probably the lightest weight. And the cheapest!