Updated EF 24-70mm f/2.8L II on the Horizon? [CR1]

Talys said:
@Michael Clark - I think that dual pixel AF is actually pretty decent when there is enough light. It still struggles a bit when it is darker though, and the raw speed on a DSLR in live view is still very slightly slower. I was pretty impressed with m50 AF speeds, given the price.

Because Canon doesn't yet have a pro-ish MILC yet, we don't have advanced af modes with dpaf yet, so we will soon see how that pans out.

@cfb - lol :) as they say, a picture is worth a thousand words.

Apparently it got taken down. :(
Upvote 0

Full body portraits on the street - 50mm f/1.2L or 85mm f/1.4L IS

stevelee said:
It was an interesting day. A lovely young woman didn't say anything to me, but it seemed apparent she was posing by a fountain. A young black guy walked up to me and said, "Take my picture." So I did. He asked what paper or something would the picture be in, and was a bit disappointed when I told him I was just having fun. I had just the camera and the one lens, but that must have been enough to make him think I was a pro. So I didn't have to approach people or sneak pictures. I still have a couple of 11" x 14" prints from the day.

You know, you can’t tell this story and not post a scan of these :) ....
Upvote 0

Tenerife - advice for birding please

picturefan said:
There is the Blue Chaffinch (Fringilla teydea), a bird endemic to Teneriffe, probably you know. Once read it can be seen e.g. in the Parque Natural Corona Forestal (eastern-central area of the isle). Around Pico Teide it is very rocky, probably the coastal forests or in the northern parts there should be good places for birds. For your next time, central spain is a superb place for birding.
Go to southern Teneriffe (between Teneriffe and La Gomera) for whale watching (long finned pilot whale) and dolphins.

Have fun and enjoy the trip!

Thank you so much for replying. Unfortunately, this is an old thread which has been reopened and hijacked by someone who is using it to advertise a rather gross amusement park in Tenerife. I went to southern Tenerife in January. Had a great time but didn’t see many birds. El Teide really was worth the visit to see the moonscape.

Edit: the mods have now removed the spam.
Upvote 0

Anything Wrong with 50 1.8 STM on a 6D?

Don Haines said:
AlanF said:
Larsskv said:
pwp said:
I'd agree with most of these posts, the 40mm f/2.8 Shorty McForty or the Tamron 45mm f/1.8 would be great choices, well ahead of the EF 50mm f/1.8. My daughter lucked out with a second hand one for $40 which is a genuinely decent copy. The 50mm Canon is certainly a cheapie, and you might get lucky with a good one, but somewhat random copy variation might play a negative position for you.

If budget constraints are tight, go for the Shorty McForty pre-owned. They're a rock solid little lens with a huge following.

-pw

If I recall correctly, Lensrentals has found the 50 f1.8 STM to have excellent, almost non excisting, copy variation.

+1 You are absolutely right that it is incorrect to imply a large copy variation for the 50mm f/1.8 STM as the opposite is true. This is what Lensrentals writes: "Remember, the Canon 50mm f/1.8 STM is the standard against which all other lenses are measured. It’s amazingly consistent." https://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2016/05/sony-fe-50mm-f1-8-mtf-and-consistency/ (they have the MTF variation of the Sony compared with the Canon 50/1.8)
Let me correct something I said earlier.....

The OLD version of the 50 F1.8 has terrible AF inconsistency.... the STM version is much better. The old version can be found used for almost nothing, and is not worth the price.

The original f/1.8 is an excellent lens with a metal mount. I had one from the film days which I sold for about $150 a short while ago after I bought the STM. It was replaced by the version II, which would break into II when dropped.
Upvote 0

MT 26EXRT first impression

Zeidora said:
Improvement yes, substantial no.

There are multiple small improvements, but it is not a leap.
- the unit is lighter, which helps with handheld imaging.
- lower power setting is good for z-stacking with open f-stop. Had to use ND filters on MT24. I also used it as a trigger flash for a UV modified Metz 45 CT1 with optical slave, and there the negligible light contribution from the MT26 @1/512 power is an advantage as well. Now upgraded to a Buff Whitelight 1600 UV and that is radio-controlled.
- The Canon diffusors clip onto the unit, so do not fall off, and are a bit smaller, so less chance of touching specimen.
- Diffusion strength is a tad better, but not by a large factor. If you use the unit for close-up (1:5 to 1:1), then you may still want to Frankenstein the diffusors, or do something else, like fill light, reflectors, indirect lighting, etc. For close-up I prefer using either studio flash with small softbox, or use my 580 on a Flashzebra cord through a Westcott diffusor and reflector on other side.
- I shoot mainly 1:1 to 5:1, and there the reflectors are effectively a "large light source"; see Hunter & Fukua "Light: Science and Magic". For that the stock diffusors are more than adequate.

The MR14 is a ring light. Never liked those as they produce very flat light. Got one back in the OM days as a feebee, but only used it one day for playing, then went on the shelf. The adjustment options on the MT24/26 will take some time to understand: Rotational angle of reflectors, inclination angle of reflectors, overall power and flash exposure compensation, left-right power distribution. For instance, directing flash not directly onto subject, but only hitting it with a peripheral glance, produces much softer light, and helps with foreground/background illumination balance.
Diffusion is important, but the other factors are equal if not overall more important. Take your time playing around with the unit once it arrives. Put camera on tripod, fix everything onto one object, then start taking lots of pictures (2-300) with all sorts of adjustments of nothing but the flash.

Re your question of improvement, the MT26 will be a substantial improvement over the MR14.

Hope that helps.

Thank you Zeidora

I'll printout the above to read and re-read until everything sinks in.

I've a feeling that moving from the RingLite to the Twin Lite will improve my macro images substantially

Once again, thank you for the feedback
Upvote 0

Sonykon = Sony is the head of Nikon?

ahsanford said:
fullstop said:
Over the last 10 years Canon has not been able to offer their customers "superior sensors" by not only designing but also "fabbing" them in-house. Rather the opposite.

I know. So many people abandoned Canon for doing th--

Oh. Wait.

- A

Impossible to tell but I bet that Nikon/Sony camera/sensor has hurt at least to some degree Canon's sales.
Upvote 0

Are These The Next Canon Cameras To Be Announced? [CR1]

fullstop said:
i very much doubt Yongnuo, Meike or Samyang got official licenses for IP from Canon. :-)
While I don't work for any of them, I'd be very surprised if they not all have gotten some "love letters" from Canon legal department/lawyers on various occasions. Not on Valentine's day, but following their product announcements. :-)

Thanks for clearing that up. Fantasy letters.
Upvote 0

Tamron 70-210mm f/4 VC USD (A034) Review | Dustin

TWI by Dustin Abbott said:
Durf said:
Another great review series! (as usual).

After using the Tamron 45 and 85mm f/1.8's for the last couple of months this 70-210mm lens looks somewhat like a step backwards in build quality and perhaps image quality too, although your photos look rather nice with it.

I was hoping you were to say more exciting things about this lens as I do want to get a 70-200mm f/4 lens to finish my kit out by the end of this year. I think I may take a closer look at the Canon 70-200mm f/4 IS zoom. (version ii).

You can take pretty photos with most lenses if you know what you're doing. I would recommend waiting to see what the 70-200 f/4L IS II has to offer, as it seems like Canon has really put their development efforts into it. I think the Tamron is a good choice if you have budget constraints, but I would be shocked if the new Canon wasn't the better lens.

I'm pretty sure the new Canon 70-200mm f/4 IS USM ii will be the better lens, but at a much higher cost.

If I do get the new Canon zoom I may end up sanding it down a bit and giving it a custom all black paint job! ;)
Upvote 0

Canon Officially Discontinues the EOS-1v Film Camera

RGF said:
I had this camera Very nice. May it rest in peace

I still have mine, (I was a Nikon film shooter) in the good old days, but since I switched to Canon with the first 5D to replace my crappy Nikon D200, I couldn't resit buying a 1V. I got it like new (4 rolls on the counter) for about 250€ and I won't let it rest in peace. :)

I use digital for work, but for my personal / hobby use, it's mainly about film. Most of my personal work is about 4x5 with 2 Linhof cameras, but I use also a Contax ST, a Leica R7, and an Olympus OM4Ti. They are all very fun to use, each with their own style.

I use the manual cameras for BW and color print film mostly, but my heart beats for chrome film. This is where the EOS 1V really shines, since it allows more keepers thanks to AF and more advanced light metering. Plus I use also my Leica / Contax / Olympus lenses with it. Considering the insane price of slide film + E6 processing, that's worth something.

Photography is not always about having the sharpest image, it's a lot about the fun to use the toys and the "feel" of the final image. In these areas film has still plenty to deliver.
Upvote 0

CPS loaner process -- enthusiasts welcome (...sort of)

I've been Gold CPS for three years. I am not a full-time pro, but I do sell images to magazines, do some stock and have >100 points. CPS has been good to me, and - in retrospect - the loaners they've afforded me have caused me to spend something on the order of 20x what my CPS fees were over that time. I have no qualms in saying that I've been a good investment for them.

I answered the membership questionnaire honestly, and no one ever suggested that because I was not full-time I didn't belong. I think the definition is a bit fudgy, which allows them room to be reasonable.

It would be a real shame to lose access to CPS. The repair treatment is fantastic - one prime reason I wouldn't move to Sony, where I've had rather the opposite experience. I had a 2 year old 5D mark IV die on me two weeks ago. Sent it in on Saturday and had it back with a replaced board on Wednesday. And they decided rather arbitrarily not to charge me. But the loaners are the real reason I'm a member. I have learned a great deal shooting most of Canon's range of glass over these years, and it's allowed me to really know what I want to purchase - and to have a heck of a time using some amazing glass.

I was thinking that Sigma and Tamron should do something similar. I think loaners would go a long way to convert those people who think their cameras will be polluted if they fasten on a third party lens. Tamron recently started a points system, but only the highest level allows for loaners.
Upvote 0

Sony is number one in the Chinese Full Frame market

Keith_Reeder said:
neuroanatomist said:
It sounds like you're so emotionally attached to your tools that you sleep with your Sony camera.
Defining yourself by your choice of camera really does suggest a personality which is fundamentally lacking in some pretty important ways.

There are far more important things to be emotionally invested in...

Wait--are you saying you don't sleep with yours?
Upvote 0

Loupedeck gets an upgrade.

Loupedeck+ New Features At A Glance:

Mechanical keys with a more precise and sturdy feel
Improved build quality
Two dedicated customisable dials and seventeen buttons
'Custom Mode' that allows full user control of all dials
Configuration software built from scratch for an even better, faster and more stable photo editing experience

https://www.ephotozine.com/article/loupedeck-photo-editing-console-gets-an-upgrade-32401

A North American photographer gets the VIP treatment at Sony

littleB said:
...As for beginning of the article, it very clearly reminds me of the book Gekaufte Journalisten by Udo Ulfkotte. I do not know its exact English translation, something like Sold Journalists. There is a story in this book how some Gulf country invited journalists, and paid all their expenses on the trip, every their wish was addressed. It is quite natural that those journalists wrote very positive feefback articles about that country, despite all the social problems of that autocratic country, and despite the fact that the head of the country was a tyrany.

Now I see that Rishi of DPReview went there. I would never call him unbiased, given that fact. It is quite natural for a human person, when given all the welcome treatment, to lose their critical point of view and become slightly biased, then the bias will gradually grow and then suddenly an independent journalist loses integrity completely and turns into what Ulfkotte calls a presstitute. This does not happen at once, its very slow and gradual.

This has long been a problem in American journalism when it comes to business, sports, film, cooking, etc.

Many times these journalists are actually fans who cover an industry where they would personally like to be the people or companies they are covering. Companies like Canon, Nikon, Sony, etc., know very well how to manipulate these journalists. Just read any of the Q&As that DPReview publishes after a trade show. The companies set the ground rules and the "journalists" happily comply and never come close to asking any really difficult questions or attempt to verify what they have been spoon fed.

This particular article is no worse or better than any other, but at least it discloses that the writers were all there on a junket paid for by Sony, so people can take that into account.
Upvote 0

Where to stay and visit in Florida for bird photography

Alan

If you haven’t been yet, it is amazing.

I have had very good luck following this list. Also read the comments for some additional suggestions.
https://photographylife.com/florida-birding-near-orlando

A few other thoughts:
  • I have heard from locals and my own experience is that, for whatever reason, weather tends to be a bit better in early February. Late January is really hit or miss. Early February is mostly “hit.” Of course, there is no predicting the weather.
  • If you can, get a "Sun Pass" for your car or carry a lot of quarters/dollar bills with you. Tolls are everywhere in central Florida. The Sun Pass will let you drive around and pay via credit card.
  • I do not mean to state the obvious if you already know, but check distances. Florida is a big state. For example, I totally agree about the JN Darling NWR, but Sanibel is its own worthy destination. It is 4-5 hrs from Orlando, depending on traffic.
  • If you do go to Sanibel, great food, great beaches, amazing shells, and I'd see if you can find a deal on the "South Sea Plantations." Often expensive, but I've found good deals there before.

As for birding around Orlando, the list hasn't let me down yet, but I would say my favorites are Gatorland, Black Point drive on Merritt Island NWR, Orlando Wetlands Park, and Circle B-Bar Reserve.

Enjoy!
Upvote 0

Filter

Forum statistics

Threads
37,439
Messages
973,612
Members
24,804
Latest member
chrisgphoto

Gallery statistics

Categories
1
Albums
29
Uploaded media
372
Embedded media
1
Comments
25
Disk usage
1 GB