Posts

GMCPhotographics · Sep 5, 2017

padam said:
If the range is suitable, the 11-24 is a perfectly fine lens. I found it too heavy with the 1DX but fine with 5D or 6D (or Sony mirrorless, where it actually works with the stabilization very nicely).
In the less extreme range it has better distortion control than all the other EF lenses (including the primes) and it is more than sharp enough everywhere with some border CAs that are easy to correct.

Right....by distortion control...I'm assuming you mean that straight lines stay more straight....but circles get distorted into weird egg shapes? With ultra wide lenses, there is either fisheye or rectilinear corrected. There are no other types of wide lenses. The amount of rectilinear correction is down to the lens engineer and intended lens usage. With a fish eye, circles stay round but a fully corrected rectilinear lens...the straight stay straight. but in both cases the opposite happens to the straights or circles. Neither is correct.
So a lens engineer (or lens program) dials in the correction based on what the intended usage is for. Something like a 14L, TSe 17L or 11-24L is likely to want to shoot architecture more than people. So it's corrected for straight lines (but makes a mess of faces / circles etc). Something like a general ultra wide (16-35 f4LIS is a good example) is corrected for general use, allowing post prod to perfectly straighten lines or enhance circles. It walks a median path through them both.
So please don't think that a 11-24L is a better corrected lens...it isn't...it's just better for straight lines, which may not be what you need in every situation. I have a TSe 17L, a 16-35IIL and a 8-15L fisheye for this reason...I need the right tool for the right situation.

snoke · Sep 4, 2017

https://www.dpreview.com/news/9799125170/panasonic-issues-promised-gh5-firmware-update-with-a-host-of-unexpected-extras

Too many feature, don't understand all.

Panasonic GH5 now have HLG raw for UHD.

What HLG?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hybrid_Log-Gamma

HLG more like eye, less like computer. Not needed for raw, can change curve after. Can't change curve for 4:2:0/4:2:2 like raw.

Sep 4, 2017

AvTvM said:
neuroanatomist said:

I ordered the M6 after the M100 specs came out.

Click to expand...

out of curiosity: what triggered your decision in the end?

I am still undecided between M5 and M100, but leaning towards M5

A. "EVF and full control layout" = M5
... but package is bigger than I like and I have not found a suitable bag/carrying solution [LowePro Dashpoint dilemma ];
M6 not really an option to me, since it is not much smaller than M5 and not cheaper with external EVF

B. "Smallest possible package" = M100
But no EVF (not even optional), meek battery and lack of control points / nerfed UI and no flash shoe ...

M5 is too big, for me. 2 cm taller and 1.5 cm thicker than the M6, for me that's too big for a travel/backup camera; the M5 is closer to the SL2 than the M6 in size. So for me, it was a choice between the M6 and the M100.

The M100 is really not much smaller than the M6 – it's only ~3mm less wide (specs say 4mm, but the M6 strap lugs are a little bigger), the M100 is only 1 mm shorter, and it's only ~3 mm less deep (specs say close to 1 cm, but most of the M6 added depth is the forward-protruding contoured grip, which doesn't add to depth with a lens attached).

I went with the M6 for the better ergonomics (more comfortable grip), better controls (a bona fide mode dial), hotshoe (if I need a flash, I prefer the bounce capability of the 270EX II), and availability as a kit with the M18-150 (I have no desire for the M15-45).

As for the 'Dashpoint dilemma', that is an issue only for the M6 + M18-150 combo (or + M55-200). The M6 + M11-22 (or M18-55) fits in the Dashpoint 30. The M6 + M22/2 fits in the Dashpoint 20. Would be a bigger dilemma with the M5, of course – maybe the M5 + M22/2 would go in Dashpoint 30, but otherwise I think the Dashpoint series is out with the M5. The M100 + M18-150 would fit in the Dashpoint 30, though (or so I assume, since the M/M2 + M18-150 fits). Actually, the M6 combo barely fits in the Dashpoint 30 – the strap lugs put a little strain on the zipper, but it closes. That could be useful for packing it in a backpack, I think, but not for belt access. For that purpose, I ordered a Lowepro Format TLZ-10 which looks to be 'just right' for the M6 + M18-150.

Since my most-used M lens is the 11-22, the M6 combo in the Dashpoint 30 will work well for me. The M18-150 fits nicely in the Dashpoint 20.

SecureGSM · Sep 4, 2017

That's is good to hear. 5% of sharpness difference is An average sharpness Loss for a lens that is out of tune by around +/- 5 AFMA units and is likely noticeable for you (not for your clients, no

)when review at 1:1 magnification on high pixel density bodies like 80D, 5DsR, etc..

ashmadux said:
5% is almost literally nothing. It is good to know though.

I've had some misfocus issues several times on my rebels, but overall i've never found them affected by afma issues, with ANY of my lenses. I've shot a 70-200 extensively on a t2i, and i pixel peep like it was a gift from the digital image gods. All good in the hood always, and hopefully, forever

AlanF · Sep 3, 2017

600mm amplifies shake nearly 2x relative to 400mm (don't tell me 600/400 = 1.5, shake goes up faster than focal length in practice). I have gone down as low as 1/80s fully hand held on a 5DSR, http://www.canonrumors.com/forum/index.php?topic=29874.msg674826#msg674826 but I wouldn't recommend it - the faster the better at long focal lengths. If you can't get a sharp shot below 1/500s, then send it back to Sigma.

Jack Douglas · Sep 3, 2017

Bumpy yes, and I sent a suggestion to Canon to put touch shutter on the LCD. Just pressing a button causes shake. I guess I'll have to dig out my remote release. Imagine touch focus and no touch shutter!

I wish more people would contact Canon regarding shortcomings.

Jack

Dylan777 · Sep 3, 2017

candc said:
Dylan777 said:

candc said:

i use canon and sony cameras. they both have their advantages and i like them both for different reasons. you can use canon lenses on sony e mount cameras so it gives you a lot of options. it is true that the sony 2.8 zooms are similar in size to the dslr counterparts. there are sometimes good smaller sized options for the sony if that's what you are after.

here is a good example: i think i am going to pick up the new sony 12-24 f/4 lens for use on my a7rii. from what i gather it is just as good as the canon 11-24 or sigma 12-24 and it is more compact and about half the weight of those lenses. many of the sony lenses are more expensive than their dslr counterparts but not in this case. the sony is about the same price as the sigma and half that of the canon. so in this case the sony is more appealing to me.

p.s. . i also like using my canon fd 50mm f/1.2L on the a7rii.sony does have a 50mm f/1.4 lens but i already have the 55 f/1.8 lens and really like it

Click to expand...

I have both, FE50f1.4 is more indoor use. Love the IQ.

If you get a chance, try to pair the FE28f2 and FE85f1.8 with your FE55f1.8. These are great combo to pack for light day without giving up Execellent IQ.

Click to expand...

that is a good suggestion. the fe 28 is a really good lens by all accounts and my trusty fd 28 that i have had for 35 years is due for an update

Kinda nice to have IS built on the sensor. I'm able to shoot 1/10 hand held with my 50f1.4

Mt Spokane Photography · Sep 2, 2017

Photographers took some amazing photos over the past 140 years with only one shot. Then it was cover the plate or film, flip the holder over, remove the film / plate cover on the other side of the holder, and wait for the next good opportunity. I have used 10 fps at racing events, but in the end, after going thru hundreds of images, I would have took the preferred one 9 of 10 times with one shot.

The only time I found high fps a potential necessity was trying to capture a arrow in flight, and the end of a bull whip at faster than the speed of sound. Then, 10 fps was not even in the ballpark.

colorblinded · Sep 2, 2017

mistaspeedy said:
After testing it out for a bit... it started working!

Don't worry, it'll break again. I've had mine since 2000 or 2001 and although I've given up on it for pretty much the past decade, I've managed to revive it from time to time. Sometimes I've done mild disassembly, blown it out with canned air, and the AF will start working again (possibly no causation there), sometimes it just starts working on its own. Give it a good shake, it might work... who knows?

Either way, it will break again. Yours will break again. It is so.

GammyKnee said:
So Canon have determined that some copies of a lens that is renowned for having a fragile and dodgy AF mechanism, have a dodgy AF mechanism. But only some, right?

Seriously though it's amazing that they haven't updated this lens yet. I'm really glad I got my Tamron 45mm when I did instead of holding out for a new Canon alternative.

I don't get why they haven't. Granted I also have a 50 1.8STM that I keep in my mirrorless kit so I probably don't care much anymore. I've come to prefer having an 85 1.8 and a 35mmish equivalent over a 50 1.4 on full frame.

ajfotofilmagem · Sep 2, 2017

Many thanks Paul, for the complete answer.

My feeling is that Canon made the "430ex III RT" to be competitive with Yongnuo, and at the end of the project someone from marketing said, "Hey, we have to cripple the AF assist, otherwise it will hurt our 600EX sales of $ 500" :-[. It is disappointing that a very capable flash has a downgrade in AF assist, compared to the 430ex II.

Talys · Sep 2, 2017

Pretty cool!

Now, I would like to see the 5200mm lens used

Jopa · Sep 2, 2017

Re: D850 a ‘Baby Nikon D5’: 46 MP + 10 fps + D5 AF setup

Mikehit said:
accept your decision and discuss the pros and cons like an adult.

How do you know he's an adult? ;D

Viggo · Sep 2, 2017

phuangk said:
Got this lens for a month and finally took it out for some shooting a week ago.
Very nice lens and sharp when you get it focus.
This lens can auto focus properly if I use Live view focus on my Canon 6D, however, if i use optical viewfinder to focus, it is really hit and missed.
This is my first Sigma lens, is this normal for Sigma Art series lenses?

.Thanks

Normal or not, it's a common fault of them. I had FIVE with this issue and I'm never buying again, while others have and love theirs. The last 50 I had worked for six months so I can work and then start to have this issue.

gjones5252 · Sep 2, 2017

I live in the USA in Arizona. Hopefully repair time will not be that bad. I have three other backup cameras. This one is just typically my go to camera. I'll update this once I talk to canon.
Thanks for the help.

[email protected] · Sep 1, 2017

One would expect that as the camera and lens market is gutted on the low end, that successful companies would be the ones who own the high end. Canon is certainly one. With that rebalancing of their portfolio, you'd expect them to need more manufacturing capacity where they make there high end products. Dog bites man.

Talys · Sep 1, 2017

Mikehit said:
9VIII said:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IMAX

IMAX Film is supposed to be around 12K resolution equivalent, people could recognise that there is a desire for super high resolution media as far back as the 1970's, I don't see why that should be any different now.
It's not that hard to meet the minimum requirements for an IMAX experience in your home either: http://www.lfexaminer.com/20090522a.htm

we aim for a minimum eye-to-screen distance of 0.35 times…screen width and a maximum distance to the last row equal…to the screen width.”

Click to expand...

As long as the back row is within spec for IMAX, then sitting 6 feet from an 82" screen is within spec for a "home equivalent" to IMAX.
The back row may not be ideal, but neither is 4K, in fact if IMAX is equivalent to 12K that means 4K is actually almost exactly 10x less total pixels (12K at 16:9 would be 81 Million pixels, 4K is 8,294,400).
So if you factor in the lower image quality of 4K, it is still appropriate to be used interchangably with 1080p.
I predict 4K will be the "SD resolution" of the year 2100 and beyond.

8K is finally within the same order of magnitude of detail as IMAX, but even that is less than half the pixel count and really will probably be appropriate in 99% of home theaters at the same screen size people have today.

Click to expand...

So in a viewing room 6 meters long, you need a screen size of 18metres. Yeah, right.

It's a nonlinear growth ratio. When you're at IMAX, you aren't expected to see the whole screen. If you were at home and it were possible to have the same ratio, your seating would be elevated and for you to be so immersed your front wall (with the screen) would ideally be several times larger than the back, with the whole wall a viewport.

Of course, unicorns are nice too.

jedy · Sep 1, 2017

I'm all for improved optics but between Canon and Sigma, their lenses are getting quite large.

PureClassA · Sep 1, 2017

Re: Sony's New RX0 Camera Combines Acclaimed RX Image Quality with an Ultra-Compact, Waterproof and

I think it's more particular than even that. The Go Pro lines runs from about $150 to $399. GoPro has simply never tested the market above that price. Not to say they should increase the Hero past $399, but make a whole new top end at $699 like Sony is testing here. With the huge popularity of these things, GoPro could have opened up a high end market for these the same way Apple did with Laptops. Before The MacBook, no one considered buying a $1500 laptop. And with Apple's sucess in proving there was a market for this that could be created, now we see all these windows based laptops and tablets at $1000+ we didn't have before.

So yes, Sony wisely beat them to this punch and may take that market segment away from GoPro if they dont respond quickly.

Hector1970 said:
GoPro really screwed up here. They had this market cornered but started making only incremental improvements. They should have gone for bigger sensors in their last models.

Arty · Sep 1, 2017

An option is to just pick up the 35F2 or the 35F2IS and use this focal length for most of your shooting. If you don't use the 70-200, just sell it. The 85 makes a great portrait lens, and you could use the 17-40 for travel and landscapes. The 17-40 is light and compact.
There is really no need to get rid of all your glass, unless money is the issue. If you don't like to use the 24-105, then sell it. However, I have gotten some really nice shots with that lens. I prefer smaller primes, but there are times when the zoom is really useful.
I have the 35F2 and the newer version with IS. If you want small and light, you can't beat the older lens. However, the newer lens has much better flare resistance, faster AF, and the IS helps when lighting gets very low. I don't think it is sharper than the old lens, but the flare resistance, AF, and IS are worth it.

SecureGSM · Sep 1, 2017

Correct, for portraits, single or small group of people, with a single softbox of round, Octa, square or rectangular (typicaly 2:3 sides ratio) shape.. there is no universal rule to cover all scenarios and specific cases:
Multiple light sources, stripboxes, types of light modifiers, required quality of light, shadows and directionality of light.

LDS said:
Are your rules based on a specific kind of subjects - i.e. portraits? Because IMHO in general, without taking into account size, shape and surface type of the subject, they are going to fail in several situations. Also perimeter puts narrows stripboxes together square softboxes.

illadvisedhammer · Aug 31, 2017

I use a xxD for macro and best focus, an M2 for travel and compactness, but I occasionally stick a roll of film into an old 620 to get shallower depth of field and interesting grains. I shot a few rolls on a Fuji GA645 which was fun, but a little wide angle. I'm trying to decide between a couple of options for mostly portraits, and maybe to blow up the occasional print to 16*20. For about the same price, I could get an old Pentax 645 and 150 3.5 manual focus lens, or a Rokinon 50 1.2 lens for the M. It would cost over 2ce the Rokinon lens to have autofocus on the medium format. I'm wondering if anyone has played with both, I can see differences as well as similarities. Both are manual focus, but with digital I can take 5 shots to nail focus on one, each shot is precious, well, about 1.40 to develop and scan per shot. Medium format should enlarge much better, but the resolution of scans at the larger developers is the same as current APS-C sensors, though maybe those are better pixels. I could develop myself, but I don't want to. Sometimes I like film grain. the Rokinon will be much smaller, so it will probably get used more. The depth of field and field of view should be similar, 150 3.5 is similar to 57mm 1.3 on APS-C. What do experience have you had in medium format vs finding very fast lenses for smaller sensors?

Sporgon · Aug 31, 2017

rishi_sanyal said:
Your last point about the Nikon's older 36MP Exmor sensor being better - in what way? In base ISO DR, yes, but only because of ISO 64 mode, which effectively extends pixel capacity so the camera can capture more total light. But the a7R II's BSI + dual-gain design allows it to achieve better high ISO performance.

Thanks for taking the time to go through my post. I was referring to low ISO and should have stated that.

SecureGSM · Aug 31, 2017

that would be a correct outcome, in my experience, for both halogen and incandescent light. However CFL and LED that were mentioned above is a different animal.

Viggo said:
I got repeatable results with the exact same AFMA value in both sunlight and using my halogen work lamp. This I also
Tested when I first got FoCal. This because I know lights flicker and wanted to test both the sun and others. It gave consistent front focus with the sun and other sources, on any lens/camera combo.

Canon Rumors · Aug 31, 2017

HTML:

<p><em>Compact Interchangeable Lens Camera with New Touch Screen Interface Effortlessly Captures and Shares Blur-Free, High-Quality Images in Any Scene</em></p>
<p><strong>CENTER VALLEY, Pa., August 31, 2017 —</strong> Olympus’ new OM-D E-M10 Mark III is a compact, lightweight, easy-to-use interchangeable lens camera that offers the performance and image quality of the OM-D® lineup to the snapshooter looking to expand their photography. The OM-D E-M10 Mark III includes best-in-class image stabilization compensation performance and the same TruePic VIII Image Processor used in Olympus’ acclaimed flagship OM-D E-M1 Mark II camera. This combination delivers high-quality images even in situations when camera shake typically causes blur, such as night scenes or handheld telephoto shooting. | <a href="http://tidd.ly/baea5e3f">Park Cameras (UK)</a></p>
<p><strong>Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III: <a href="https://bhpho.to/2vHSP4l">B&H Photo</a> | <a href="http://amzn.to/2x8U0NJ">Amazon</a>| <a href="http://tidd.ly/baea5e3f">Park Cameras (UK)</a></strong></p>
<p>Consumers looking to step up from their smartphone camera to an interchangeable lens system will instantly benefit from the OM-D E-M10 Mark III’s 5-Axis Image Stabilization. With an image stabilization system built into the camera body, it can provide blur-free images no matter which lens is attached, and can also record crisp, shake-free handheld 4K videos in cinemalike quality.</p>
<p><!--more--></p>
<p>The camera is compact and lightweight to easily be taken anywhere to capture and share standout, like-worthy images on social media. Designed for ease of use, both in form and functionality, the grip rests nicely in the hand, and buttons and dials are thoughtfully positioned for effortless operation. The body is equipped with a variety of features for different shooting styles and situations, including a high-resolution electronic viewfinder, a tilting rear LCD monitor with touch controls similar to a smartphone and a built-in flash.</p>
<p>First-time interchangeable lens camera users benefit from four shooting assist modes to capture brilliant images right out of the box. The intelligent AUTO Mode detects the shooting scene, subject, camera movement and light transmitted through the lens, then automatically chooses the optimal settings. The other assist modes include Scene Mode (SCN), Advanced Photo Mode (AP), and Art Filter Mode (ART), each of which appear on the mode dial alongside AUTO Mode for easy access.</p>
<p>The Touch AF shutter, which now takes advantage of 121 autofocus points, allows users to choose the precise area of focus and trip the shutter simply by touching the LCD screen. Continuous AF (C-AF) Mode maintains focus on moving subjects when the shutter is pressed halfway.</p>
<p>The OM-D E-M10 Mark III is equipped with built-in Wi-Fi®, which can be used in conjunction with the Olympus Image Share (OI.Share®) app to easily connect to a smart device and wirelessly transfer images for quick editing and uploading to social media.</p>

<p><strong>Pricing and Availability </strong>

The Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III will be available in a black and silver body or black body beginning in late September with an estimated street price of $649.99 USD/$799.99 CAD (body only) and $799.99 USD/$999.99 CAD (M.Zuiko 14–42mm EZ Lens kit). For a complete list of specifications, visit the Olympus website: <a href="http://getolympus.com/digitalcameras/omd/e-m10-mark-iii.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">http://getolympus.com/digitalcameras/omd/e-m10-mark-iii.html</a>.</p>
<p><strong>Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III: <a href="https://bhpho.to/2vHSP4l">B&H Photo</a> | <a href="http://amzn.to/2x8U0NJ">Amazon</a>| <a href="http://tidd.ly/baea5e3f">Park Cameras (UK)</a></strong></p>

		<style type='text/css'>
			#gallery-1 {
				margin: auto;
			}
			#gallery-1 .gallery-item {
				float: left;
				margin-top: 10px;
				text-align: center;
				width: 25%;
			}
			#gallery-1 img {
				border: 2px solid #cfcfcf;
			}
			#gallery-1 .gallery-caption {
				margin-left: 0;
			}
			/* see gallery_shortcode() in wp-includes/media.php */
		</style>
		<div id='gallery-1' class='gallery galleryid-31049 gallery-columns-4 gallery-size-thumbnail'><dl class='gallery-item'>
			<dt class='gallery-icon landscape'>
				<a href='http://www.canonrumors.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/2938461437.jpg'><img width="168" height="168" src="http://www.canonrumors.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/2938461437-168x168.jpg" class="attachment-thumbnail size-thumbnail" alt="" srcset="http://www.canonrumors.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/2938461437-168x168.jpg 168w, http://www.canonrumors.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/2938461437-144x144.jpg 144w" sizes="(max-width: 168px) 100vw, 168px" /></a>
			</dt></dl><dl class='gallery-item'>
			<dt class='gallery-icon landscape'>
				<a href='http://www.canonrumors.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/1766950641.jpg'><img width="168" height="168" src="http://www.canonrumors.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/1766950641-168x168.jpg" class="attachment-thumbnail size-thumbnail" alt="" srcset="http://www.canonrumors.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/1766950641-168x168.jpg 168w, http://www.canonrumors.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/1766950641-144x144.jpg 144w" sizes="(max-width: 168px) 100vw, 168px" /></a>
			</dt></dl><dl class='gallery-item'>
			<dt class='gallery-icon landscape'>
				<a href='http://www.canonrumors.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/1293792360.jpg'><img width="168" height="168" src="http://www.canonrumors.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/1293792360-168x168.jpg" class="attachment-thumbnail size-thumbnail" alt="" srcset="http://www.canonrumors.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/1293792360-168x168.jpg 168w, http://www.canonrumors.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/1293792360-144x144.jpg 144w" sizes="(max-width: 168px) 100vw, 168px" /></a>
			</dt></dl><dl class='gallery-item'>
			<dt class='gallery-icon landscape'>
				<a href='http://www.canonrumors.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/5369536111.jpg'><img width="168" height="168" src="http://www.canonrumors.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/5369536111-168x168.jpg" class="attachment-thumbnail size-thumbnail" alt="" srcset="http://www.canonrumors.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/5369536111-168x168.jpg 168w, http://www.canonrumors.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/5369536111-144x144.jpg 144w" sizes="(max-width: 168px) 100vw, 168px" /></a>
			</dt></dl><br style="clear: both" />
		</div>

<span id="pty_trigger"></span>
<div style="font-size:0px;height:0px;line-height:0px;margin:0;padding:0;clear:both"></div>

Canon Rumors · Aug 30, 2017

HTML:

Canon has released new firmware for the Cinema EOS C100 Mark II & Cinema EOS C300 Mark II.</p>
<p><strong>Canon Cinema EOS C300 Mark II Firmware Version 1.0.9.1.00 incorporates the following fixes and enhancements:</strong></p>
<ol>
<li>When CN-E70-200mm T4.4 L IS KAS S is attached the following features are enabled:
<ol>
<li>Autofocus using the Dual Pixel CMOS AF function.</li>
<li>Dual Pixel Focus Guide function.</li>
<li>The joystick on the camera’s grip unit can be set to operate the zoom.</li>
<li>Manual control of the iris with Camera’s Control dial.</li>
<li>Control of focus, zoom and iris using the separately-sold Remote Controller RC-V100.</li>
<li>Automatic aperture and push auto iris functions.</li>
<li>Start/stop recording on the lens grip.</li>
<li>Retrieval of Lens metadata, such as the model name and the focal distance will display on the camera.</li>
</ol>
</li>
<li>Allows the position of waveform monitor to be changed on the display.</li>
<li>Adds peripheral illumination/chromatic aberration correction for the following lenses:
<ol>
<li>COMPACT-SERVO Lens [CN-E70-200mm T4.4 L IS KAS S]</li>
<li>EF Lens  [EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS II USM], [EF 16-35mm f/2.8L III USM]</li>
</ol>
</li>
<li>When [Face Only] is active, the icon will change from gray to white when a face is not detected.</li>
<li>When the camera is turned off the IS mechanical lock will be active regardless of the position of the switch.</li>
<li>Fixes the list of shutter speed on the display when using Browser Remote.</li>
</ol>
<p><strong><a href="https://www.usa.canon.com/internet/portal/us/home/support/details/cameras/cinema-eos/eos-c300-mark-ii/eos-c300-mark-ii?subtab=downloads-firmware">Download Firmware Version 1.0.9.1.00 for the Cinema EOS C300 Mark II</a></strong></p>

<p><!--more--></p>
<hr />
<p><strong>Canon Cinema EOS C100 Mark II Firmware Version 1.0.5.1.00 incorporates the following enhancements:</strong></p>
<ol>
<li>When CN-E70-200mm T4.4 L IS KAS S is attached the following features are enabled:
<ol>
<li>Autofocus using the Dual Pixel CMOS AF function.</li>
<li>The joystick on the camera’s grip unit can be set to operate the zoom.</li>
<li>Manual control of the iris with Camera’s Control dial.</li>
<li>Control of focus, zoom and iris using the separately-sold Remote Controller RC-V100.</li>
<li>Automatic aperture and push auto iris functions.</li>
<li>Start/stop recording on the lens grip.</li>
<li>Retrieval of Lens metadata, such as the model name and the focal distance will display on the camera.</li>
</ol>
</li>
<li>Adds peripheral illumination correction for the following lenses.
<ol>
<li>COMPACT-SERVO Lens [CN-E70-200mm T4.4 L IS KAS S]</li>
<li>EF Lens [EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS II USM], [EF 16-35mm f/2.8L III USM]</li>
</ol>
</li>
<li>When [Face Only] is active, the icon will change from gray to white when a face is not detected.</li>
<li>When the camera is turned off the IS mechanical lock will be active regardless of the position of the switch.</li>
</ol>
<p><strong><a href="https://www.usa.canon.com/internet/portal/us/home/support/details/cameras/cinema-eos/eos-c100-mark-ii/eos-c100-mark-ii?subtab=downloads-firmware">Download Firmware Version 1.0.5.1.00 for the Cinema EOS C100 Mark II</a></strong></p>
<span id="pty_trigger"></span>
<div style="font-size:0px;height:0px;line-height:0px;margin:0;padding:0;clear:both"></div>

Posts

Posts

Filter

Forum statistics

Gallery statistics