RustyTheGeek said:

Otherwise, UPS has nothing to do with them.

Click to expand...

Thanks for explaining, in that case it's nothing like the classic franchise of the type "McDonald's, Burger Kind, ..." that keeps spreading like a virus in inner cities and malls.

neuroanatomist said:

More importantly, in my case (and I suspect the OP's), the camera is not set to 'standard' or 'auto-switch' as mentioned in the FW update, but rather 'record to multiple' - I write my RAW files to both cards. In that case, you have the option to select the card used for playback. It's worth noting that movies are recorded to the card selected for playback (although personally I don't shoot movies). When I close the door with only one slot occupied, then turn on the camera, I get a warning that recording to multiple cards is not possible, and the playback card is set to the occupied slot (in my case I always have it set to slot 1, if I remove that card it switches playback to slot 2). When I reinsert a card into slot 1, playback remains set to slot 2.

Click to expand...

That is it precisely. And evidently it's a "feature."

I write RAW to both, and since I have a propensity to break SD cards, I always use CF in my card reader. I didn't know about this feature (should have RTFM, I suppose), and I always close the card door, so it was always switching back to SD. I only ever notice it on the rare occasion I record a short video of my son and it doesn't make it to my computer.

At least now I know a few workarounds: don't close the card door with the CF out, or change it in the menu every time, or pop out the SD temporarily to have it switch back.

Thanks again for the info guys.

RustyTheGeek said:

TAW said:

Thanks for all the comments and ideas. I will certainly strip out the video as I probably say a little more then I should under my breath!

Have a GREAT week!
tom

Click to expand...

You mean audio, right? Although using your 'under the breath' comments during the slideshow of your stills might be fun!

Click to expand...

Correct on both accounts! Thank you.

ramon123 said:

I have been waiting for around 2 years to buy the Canon 70-200 F2.8L IS II and have seen it in the past drop to $1799. B&H and others have been selling it for $2149... What's going on!!!??!?!?!?!?!?

Click to expand...

There is the 6th ave ebay deal.

But if you go to canon price watch, you can get the lens for 1899 as well... so you are paying $100 more than your target price either way. I'd say get it.

Thanks people. I remember, even for the 5D3 it took a while before that happened. I guess I have no option but to wait.

Thank you all for your help! Again, this was my first post and I now have my answer. I am now going to lock the topic as an administrator suggested that I could. I kind of feel like an idiot, but I really had no idea that the unit had that function. So many buttons, dials and menus! Thanks again!

Bob Howland said:

Mt Spokane Photography said:

The 28-300L is relatively new, replacing the 35-350mmL just a few years ago. They are pretty slow sellers.

I'm doubting that a slow selling lens will be released in a seriously falling market.

Click to expand...

Does June 2004 qualify as "just a few years ago"?

http://www.canon.com/camera-museum/lens/ef/data/telephoto_zoom/ef_28~300_35~56lis_usm.html

Anyway, it's too late for me. I bought the latest version of the Tamron 28-300 as a vacation lens and it's proving to be pretty good.

Click to expand...

It does to me, I remember all the posts about it then. I've had both the 35-350 and the 28-300 IS. Both are very good lenses when you consider that they have a 10:1 zoom ration or higher. Its very difficult to make a superzoom like that. The lenses were aimed at PJ's, but many of those have found other jobs, since everyone is walking around with a camera phone, and uploads photos of accidents or other urgent news instantly.

here is the 35-350 at 35mm




At 350mm



My 28-300 at 300mm handheld 1/125 sec, cropped to 100% with my 5D MK III.

Loving this set-up, although I shoot mainly with a 5D3 or 1DX... this leaf shutter has saved my bacon numerous times. Recent shoot here on the California coast.


Portraits from San Gregorio State Beach, California...

Portraits from San Gregorio State Beach, California...

Way, way, way over my head...

but very interesting to read the more understandable sections. Astrophotography looks like fun but I have no more room to store gear.

Lee Jay said:

The big problem with this review is that most of his problems were due to not reading the manual. Using it as he did, taking single shots in AI servo, he should have set it to focus priority.

Click to expand...

I was going to mention this as well.

P.S. What was painful for me to watch, was the choice to overexpose the ice in the video and in the stills. With Canon's live-view you get live RBG histograms at the touch of a info button so you can expose to the right easily quite easily.

This on a refurb SL1 might be the perfect 'When I don't feel like lugging the 5D3' camera, not too mention adding the pancake for a bit more versatility.

scottkinfw said:

Hey Guys.
Knowing what you all know about the 1DX, and looking into your crystal balls, would you buy one now? I have a 5D3, and have been waiting to see what would be next for the 1DX. I am interested in the low light performance, the better focusing and iq. I think the mps for both the 5D3 and 1DX are fine for me.

It is just that I am seeing dramatic price drops and am wondering if it may be time to pull the trigger. I have the usual trepidation about buying and next month something new and far superior comes out ( though not that likely with Canon, as had been noted).

Thanks to all of you sage 1DX ers.

sek

Click to expand...

Scott....if you need speed, then don't hesitate and go get yourself a 1dx. If you don't need speed, then stick with your 5d3.

Harald Mante: The photograph: composition and color design.
Stephen Shore: The Nature of Photographs.
Roland Barthes: Camera Lucida: Reflections on Photography.

Mantes Book is about applying design rules to photos. Very instructive.
Shores Book is about the mental processes we may have when looking at photographic prints and during making photos.
Barthes Essay presents a conzept of "Reader-response criticism" (in German Rezeptionsäthetik) to photography.

This stuff will not help to make sharper pictures, it is simply to have more fun with Photography.

Greetings Andy

To be sure I bought a shutter count app for my MAC. Based on where my first photo started there were 80 shutter actuations before I bought the camera. Could this be normal testing at Canon?

Its difficult. They will be sold out in minutes or even seconds when there is a sale going, so you have to be patient.

DominoDude said:

Yeah, clean out all Jackdaws or Starlings found inside of the body!
Not sure a rocketblower would be enough for this task though, a flamethrower on the other hand...

Click to expand...

I thought you were joking at first then I took a closer look. I've seen a few of those gatherings here recently, just never had the camera nearby to take a shot.
Is it just me or do large huge gatherings of birds seem to be more commonplace these days?

Well, I rented the Canon 85mm f1.2 II this past weekend, and shot nearly 600 photos with it. I can definitely see why people love that lens... I miss it! Shooting at f1.2 is fun but the pictures it renders of people at f2 are even more amazing IMO. The creamy bokeh combined with the stopped down sharpness and mild compression is great. I ran into a few instances of horrific CA, but rarely. The focus ring and hood leave something to be desired but I don't have any complaints regarding the auto focus speed and accuracy... it nails focus. I liked the little extra working distance the 85mm gave me over the 50mm.

If someone was going to give me one lens or the other to shoot portraits with, I would choose the Canon 85mm all day. With that said, I have a Sigma 50mm Art on backorder at Adorama from the Canon Rumors deal this past weekend. The $1k I saved (minimum) is going to go towards lighting.

I hope someone finds this feedback useful.

serendipidy said:

seattlebirdman said:

Sometimes 960mm FOV is not enough

Here's a BIF at 1920mm - 7D2, 600mm f4 + 2X tele, f8, iso 640, 1/3200, tripod

Rising to the Perch by seattlebirdman, on Flickr

Click to expand...

WOW! Beautiful capture. 8)

Click to expand...

WOW!

Re: {PROBLEM SOLVED. Bought the 7D II} Should I buy the 7D II or the Sigma 150-600mm F5-6.3 DG OS HS

slclick said:

Enjoy and please report on your experiences and share your shots. What would I have done? I think you already have a superior body and would have gone with the glass.

Click to expand...

I would too, but I don't have the moolah for the 600L...

Life is full of compromises. Some of them come in the shape of a body - and I am not talking 7D II here

The links still show up for me. But I don't click links much. I hover over them first and usually I'm not remotely interested in the destination. As far as I'm concerned, I figure if CR is getting paid, no big deal. Heck, I barely even noticed them until the comment brought them up. The CR site works pretty well and it's not free to host. In the end, we all win since this site benefits us all. If one doesn't like the link, ignore it and don't click on it. I think most of us know it's par for the course these days anyway and don't assume the poster went to all the trouble to link to a non related site.

Coldhands said:

The only ones Canon will disappoint are those with unrealistic expectations.

Click to expand...

+1

All-I might better if it's important to capture stills from your footage.

With IPB compression the camera compare frames and throw away information.

For example: You have a person talking to the camera with a background which doesn't change. Then it doesn't need to save all the information from background portion of the footage, since it doesn't change. With All-I compression every frame is saved in its entirety, so you have 25 complete frames per second to choose from, but it needs a lot more storage space.

Viggo said:

I bought the Y-cable that lets you use both outlets and by that half the recycle time. I think it's 2.25s with the ad360 with full power, I never wait for it. I use it a lot at 1/16 power and keeps up with 9 fps.

Click to expand...

I have two Godox branded AD 360's. Viggo is right...get the Y cable. Recycle time is QUICK! Make sure to get the protective covers that really should be included in the kit. http://cameraflashaccs.com/products/bulb-protective-cover-witstro/ Check around on eBay and you'll find them for just a few dollars.

I get very successful high speed sync using the extraordinary Phottix Odin triggers. Godox may have HSS capable triggers by now, no doubt cheaper than the Odins. Worth having in your AD360 kit.

My understanding is there is no difference at all between the rebranded AD180/360's. There may be differences in warranty offers. Mine have two years. Godox is a company that has no problem at all distributing to resellers who choose to re-brand. This may change at some point in the future as the Godox brand becomes more internationally recognized and mainstream.

-pw

Marsu42 said:

meywd said:

and if i was hiding the bird would be closer to me

Click to expand...

"Birding" is indeed a bit like being lucky at hide and seek, and that's one problem: You can take an "ok" shot with your mighty expensive gear, and then the next guy with a Rebel kit lens happens to walk up right next to the bird, taking a better shot...

meywd said:

but if i didn't have 1/2000 he would be blurry.

Click to expand...

... and that's the other problem: Even if you have a tracking camera (I wouldn't even bother with my 6d), "sitting duck" in lower light has an *entirely* different iso requirement than "in flight". With IS on and snapping a few frames, you can high iq shots w/o movement. When something starts moving at higher speed, you indeed need 1/1500 (horses) or at least 1/2000 (bif), and the iso value goes through the roof.

Click to expand...

Yeah and 1/2000 is only the starting point , at least with better light the pictures are not bad, until i get a dream lens

260mm 1/2000 f/5.6 ISO 1000, cropped and processed

Where's the $1799 price???!?!?!????