Filters on tele-zooms
- Lenses
- 53 Replies
No problem with my filter, a B + W f-pro, its metal frame is slim enough.The hood won't fit over my Marumi filter attached to the lens. Presumably need a slim one. Same on the RF 800/11.
Upvote
0
No problem with my filter, a B + W f-pro, its metal frame is slim enough.The hood won't fit over my Marumi filter attached to the lens. Presumably need a slim one. Same on the RF 800/11.
Sorry, tag the wrong guyDon't waste your time telling me what I already know, tell @PhotoBob to whom I was replying.
My wedding anniversary is tomorrow, so I showed this to my wife. I think she is still chuckling.It’s REALLY hard not to look at this camera and go “Craig, it’s my birthday!” (which it actually is tomorrow) For $5000 – that’s a lot of camera. Preorder from our fine friends at B&H Photovideo here, or our other friends who are still trying to scramble from the copy / paste specifications on the
See full article...
If Canon doesn't stop making it, it would sell more the next few years. Such as PowerShot SX740 HS, the selling is no. 1 in Japan."No. 10 Canon EOS Kiss X10 Double Zoom Kit Black KISSX10BK-WKIT"
Wow
Many of us are not "most people" when it comes to the technical details of our photography equipment.Ah yes, life was simpler before calculators. I still have my engineering slide rulefrom back in the day when 1 or 2 digits and a power of 10 was sufficient for a lot of things and 3 digits was a stretch. My neighbor in the concrete business lamented customers with their plotted plans that expect concrete poured to quarter-inch tolerances when the forms will bow more than that.
Even now, most people I run into want things in relatable, ballpark terms like 750 or 800, not 776. The details usually come out only when comparing detailed specifications, and most of the time there really isn't a significant difference.
I treat all focal lengths and f-stops as "around x". Life is easier this way.
I think it's nearly impossible for us to say because we have some great photographers sharing photos here using even the RF 100-400 and on up. Some people are going to have multiple wildlife lenses while others will only use one. We can be confident the manufacturers know much more than we do.How many of the 5,926,733 shipped in 2022 and the 5,998,913 ILCs shipped last year were bought by wildlife photographers? I’m curious how ‘massive’ the wildlife photography market is and how much growth in it is occurring. Looking forward to seeing the data on which you base your claim.
Anecdotes are nice. Since Canon hasn’t lost their nearly 50% market share, I question the relevance of this and similar anecdotes.
Everything you wrote up to this one sentence is no longer relevant. All KB-Sensors could not reach the gain of a medium format sensor. The pixels have a greater diameter and the pixelspace is geater. All of them are related to the performance values like S/N-Ratio and Sensivity.I'd only consider the Canon high MP body if it had dynamic range near the GFX system, but may not be possible on a FF sensor.
They're nice. It is easier to visualize how a white flower will look. Solid colors can sometimes be different from what I thought and flowers with multiple colors might be really different. It does make me consider buying a nice set of colored filters.Some b&w versions of Trilliums I've already posted. I guess monochrome shots of white flowers are a easy mental jump for me.View attachment 216630View attachment 216632View attachment 216633
The second image is a crop of the first.
Just shove the old firmware files into a (sub)folder, leaving only the new firmware in the root of the card. At least it works consistently with my R3.IIRC, the camera refuses to do any lens update if it sees a current/old camera firmware on any card. Ironically, you have have as many old lens firmware on the card and it doesn't do anything.
It’s definitely challenging. The charts I use (same ones used by Bryan/TDP) come in several sizes down to 10x18 cm but all with the same resolution when framed correctly. Those smaller charts are the only reason I can test my 600mm with TCs in my house, where my longest sight line is ~20 m.What is additionally interesting is that this very careful and reliable site explains how they coped with the problems from a long focal length. I suspect certain other sites are not as careful in their IMATESTs with supertelephotos, explaining why there is sometimes variation in reported values.